With the increased adoption of mobile devices, mobile communication is all around us and we are connected anywhere, anytime. Mobile communication in general and mobile messenger service in particular make interpersonal communication in Korea so frequent and convenient. However, being connected too much anywhere and anytime via mobile messenger service appears to lead an increasing number of people to feel fatigue and to decrease mobile communication under some conditions. Based on a sample of 334 respondents, this study empirically investigated the relationships among commercial, noncommercial mobile messenger overload, mobile messenger fatigue, relational self-concept, and mobile shunning behavior. The findings show that (a) the effect of noncommercial mobile messenger overload is stronger than that of commercial mobile messenger overload in increasing mobile messenger fatigue although both positively affect mobile messenger fatigue, (b) relational self-concept has moderating effects on the relationship between mobile messenger overload and mobile messenger fatigue, and that (c) mobile messenger fatigue triggers mobile communicators' shunning behavior through which the communicators increase their intention to avoid mobile communication, to change their mobile phone numbers, and to subscribe to dual number service on one mobile device. When confronted with mobile messenger fatigue caused by mobile messenger overload, mobile messaging service users are likely to shun their mobile communication. Being constantly and conveniently connected appears to be a blessing in disguise.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PrzybylskiAK, WeinsteinN. Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2012; 30:237–246.
2.
OhM, LarsonJF. (2011) Digital development in Korea: building an information society. New York: Routledge.
3.
van DeursenA, BolleCL, HegnerSM, et al.Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: the role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 45:411–420.
4.
LeeAR, SonSM, KimKK. Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue: a stress perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016; 55:51–61.
5.
KussDJ, GriffithsMD. Online social networking and addiction: a review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011; 8:3528–3552.
6.
LeeHN. Press foundation survey, six out of ten always connected workers feel inconvenient. Joong Ang Daily, Mar.30, 2016. http://news.joins.com/article/19811343 (accessed April2, 2016).
7.
ShinWC, KimYK. Analysis of correlation between the use of the mobile messenger and the use of mobile telecommunication services and mobile content. International Telecommunications Policy Review, 2015; 22:123–147.
8.
KoehlerR. Closed but comfy. Seoul, June 20,. 2013. http://magazine.seoulselection.com/2013/06/20/closed-but-comfy-koreans (accessed April5, 2016).
9.
LazarusRS, FolkmanS. (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
10.
MillerTA, McCoolSF. Coping with stress in outdoor recreational settings: an application of transactional stress theory. Leisure Sciences, 2003; 25:257–275.
11.
DMC media. Current and future mobile messenger market. July2014. www.slideshare.net/girujang/dmc-201407-36736727 (accessed April8, 2016).
12.
OhBD. Feature that is most often used on smart phone is the mobile messenger. Datanews, Aug.6, 2014. http://datanews.co.kr/site/datanews/DTWork.asp?itemIDT=1002000&aID=20140806112447990&page=184 (accessed April8, 2016).
13.
LeeSH, KimSI, KimHY. An investigation on the motivation and the reciprocity of the usage of mobile messengers and its user immersion: focusing on Kakao Talk. Journal of Digital Design, 2013; 13:479–488.
14.
HanGS, KimGM, KimYS, et al. (2012) The interpersonal relationship and communication. Seoul: Komoonsa.
MooreJ. One road to turnover: an examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 2000; 24:141–168.
17.
ChoJ, RamgolamDI, SchaeferKM, et al.The rate and delay in overload: an investigation of communication overload and channel synchronicity on identification and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 2011; 39:38–54.
18.
MoonYS. An ethical study on over-communicated commercial communication (advertising) as structural transformation of the public sphere: centering on the case of free newspaper. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 2007; 18:161–186.
KimYH. A study on the interactive role of mobile advertising appeal type and temporal distance: consumer response for product types. Doctoral dissertation, Hanyang University, 2015.
21.
Mobile Marketing Association. www.mmaglobal.com/wiki/push-messaging (accessed April6, 2016).
22.
Mobile Marketing Association. www.mmaglobal.com/wiki/pull-messaging (accessed April6, 2016).
23.
LeeJS. Virtuality in mobile communication space. HCI Korea, 2005; 1:1751–1756.
24.
KimNR. Because of Kakao Talk, Facebook cries. The Digital Times, May1, 2013. www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2013050102010831789005 (accessed April10, 2016).
25.
YuDS, LeeDT, ManNW. Fatigue among older people: a review of the research literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2010; 47:216–228.
26.
PiperBF, LindseyAM, DoddMJ. Fatigue mechanisms in cancer patients: developing nursing theory. Oncology Nursing Forum, 1987; 14:17–23.
27.
ChalderT, BerelowitzG, PawlikowskaT, et al.Development of a fatigue scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1993; 37:147–153.
28.
KimKD, KimHJ, BaeY. Exploring the concept and determinants of social network service (SNS) fatigue. The Korean Association for Information Society, 2013; 26:102–129.
29.
BaumeisterRF. (1997) Identity, self-concept, and self-esteem: the self lost and found. In HoganR, JohnsonJA, eds. Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 681–710.
MarkusHR, KitayamaS. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991; 98:224–253.
32.
CrossSE, BaconPL, MorrisML. The relational interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000; 78:791–808.
33.
NaEY. Cultural impediments in mind reformation processes: face-saving and conformity. Korean Journal of Psychology: Social Issues, 1995; 2:33–51.
34.
LimTS. Communication beliefs and values in Korea: the traditional and the change. Korea Communication Association, 1999; 7:52–66.
35.
BaeJH. Satisfaction of mobile phone and appropriateness of mobile phone in interpersonal communication: focus on intergeneration. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 2001; 45:160–188.
36.
CrossSE, BaconPL, MorrisML. The relational interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000; 78:791–808.
37.
KimSU. An empirical study of personal networks. Korean Journal of Sociology, 1993; 26:1–33.
38.
JoSJ, BangHJ, JoHJ, et al.Multi-dimensional characteristics of the relational self according to contexts. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2008; 21:113–130.
ShelbyB, VaskeJJ. Resource and activity substitutions for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences, 1991; 13:21–32.
42.
ParkHS, KimSH. A study on the effects of SNS fatigue factors on intention to stop using SNS and the moderating effect of service flow. Business Management Review, 2014; 47:1–24.
43.
ChaKJ, LeeEM. An empirical study of discontinuous use intention on SNS: from a perspective of society comparison theory. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 2015; 20:59–77.
44.
BangHJ, YunJY, KimAY, et al.Exploration of the structure of relational self and development of the relational self-scale among Korean adults. Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 2007; 13:23–63.
45.
LeeSY. A study of college students' intention to avoid Facebook usage: focusing on theory of reasoned action, upward social comparison, passive following. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 2015; 32:5–42.
46.
HongSB, KangKS, LeeJS, et al.The effects on corporate image, brand image and purchase intention of service companies' social responsibility. Tourism Study, 2012; 27:453–473.
47.
ChoEA, KimG. A study on two dimensions of switching barriers affecting the switching intention: focus on hotel restaurant. Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Management, 2015; 30:239–261.
48.
CuiefordJP. (1965) Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
HairJF, AndersonRE, TathamRL, et al. (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50.
BaeBR. (2009) Structural equation modeling with AMOS 17.0: principles and practice. Seoul: Cheongram.
51.
FornellC, LarckerDF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981; 18:39–50.
52.
KentHB. Control over stress, locus of control, and response to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972; 21:249–255.
53.
YaoX, PhangCW, LingH. (2015) Understanding the influences of trend and fatigue in individuals' SNS switching intention. In 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kauai, Hawaii: IEEE, pp. 324–334.
