The present study explored social and psychological predictors of social networking site (SNS) and mobile phone dependency in a sample of emerging adults (ages 18–25, n = 159, M = 21.87, SD = 2.08) and young adults (ages 26–40, n = 97, M = 31.21, SD = 4.11). Path analysis revealed that SNS dependency mediated the relationship of social comparison, SNS support, and impulsivity on mobile phone dependency. Impulsivity also showed direct links to mobile phone dependency. The present findings suggest that individuals with a strong orientation toward social comparison, who perceive a strong sense of support through SNS networks, or who show difficulty with self-regulation may be at risk for SNS and mobile phone dependency.
BianchiA, PhillipsDJG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2005; 8:39–51.
3.
BillieuxJ. Problematic use of the mobile phone: a literature review and a pathways model. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 2012; 8:299–307.
4.
BillieuxJ, Van der LindenM, d'AcremontM, et al.Does impulsivity relate to perceived dependence on and actual use of the mobile phone?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2007; 21:527–537.
5.
WuAMS, CheungVI, KuL, et al.Psychological risk factors of addiction to social networking sites among Chinese smartphone users. Journal of Behavioral Addiction, 2013; 2:160–166.
6.
AndreassenCS. Online social network site addiction: a comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2015; 2:175–184.
7.
BillieuxJ, MaurageP, Lopez-FernandezO, et al.Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Current Addiction Reports, 2015; 2:156–162.
8.
RobertsJA, PulligC, ManolisC. I need my smartphone: a hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015; 79:13–19.
9.
ZuckermanM. (1994) Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
WangJ-L, JacksonLA, ZhangD-J, et al.The relationships among the Big Five Personality factors, self-esteem, narcissism, and sensation-seeking to Chinese University students' uses of social networking sites (SNSs). Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28:2313–2319.
11.
MoreauA, LaconiS, DelfourM, et al.Psychopathological profiles of adolescent and young adult problematic Facebook users. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 44:64–69.
12.
LeungL. (2008) Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, and addiction. In KonijnEA, UtzS, TanisM, BarnesSB, eds. Mediated interpersonal communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 359–381.
13.
ParkN, KeeKF, ValenzuelaS. Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:729–733.
14.
KrautR, KieslerS, BonevaB, et al.Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 2002; 58:49–74.
15.
OhHJ, OzkayaE, LaRoseR. How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 30:69–78.
16.
ShawLH, GantLM. In defense of the internet: the relationship between internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2002; 5:157–171.
17.
DavisRA, FlettGL, BesserA. Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use: implications for pre-employment screening. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2002; 5:331–345.
18.
KimJ, LaRoseR, PengW. Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic internet use: the relationship between internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:451–455.
19.
CaplanSE. Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 2003; 30:625–648.
20.
CaplanSE. A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication, 2005; 55:721–736.
21.
FestingerL. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954; 7:117–140.
22.
ManagoAM, GrahamMB, SalimkhanG. Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008; 29:446–458.
23.
MichikyanM, DennisJ, SubrahmanyamK. Can you guess who I am? Real, ideal, and false self-presentation on facebook among emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 2015; 3:55–64.
24.
SubrahmanyamK, ŠmahelD. (2011) Constructing identity online: identity exploration and self-presentation. In SubrahmanyamK, ŠmahelD, eds. Digital youth. New York: Springer, pp. 59–80.
25.
KussDJ, GriffithsMD. Online social networking and addiction—a review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011; 8:3528–3552.
26.
SmithA. (2015) U.S. Smartphone use in 2015. Pew Research Center. www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/ (accessed August8, 2016).
27.
PerrinA. (2015) Social media usage: 2005–2015. Pew Research Center. www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/social-networking-usage-2005/ (accessed August8, 2016).
28.
ArnettJJ. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. The American Psychologist, 2000; 55:469–480.
29.
ArnettJJ. (2004) Emerging adulthood: the winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
SteinbergL, AlbertD, CauffmanE, et al.Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 2008; 44:1764–1778.
31.
SheldonP. Profiling the non-users: examination of life-position indicators, sensation seeking, shyness, and loneliness among users and non-users of social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28:1960–1965.
32.
RobertsJA, YayaLHP, ManolisC. The invisible addiction: cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. The Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2014; 3:254–265.
33.
SalehanM, NegahbanA. Social networking on smartphones: when mobile phones become addictive. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013; 29:2632–2639.
34.
ValkenburgPM, PeterJ, SchoutenAP. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2006; 9:584–590.
35.
VogelEA, RoseJP, OkdieBM, et al.Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015; 86:249–256.
36.
Al-MenayesJ. Psychometric properties and validation of the Arabic social media addiction scale. Journal of Addiction, 2015; 2015:291743.
37.
SpinellaM. Normative data and a short form of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 2007; 117:359–368.
38.
RosenbergM. (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
ZimetGD, DahlemNW, ZimetSG, FarleyGK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1988; 52:30–41.
40.
FrisonE, EggermontS. Exploring the relationships between different types of facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 2016; 34:153–171.
41.
GibbonsFX, BuunkBP. Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999; 76:129–142.
42.
CaslerK, BickelL, HackettE. Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behaviour, 2013; 29:2156–2160.
43.
ChandlerJ, ShapiroD. Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2016; 12:53–81.
44.
FeitosaJ, JosephDL, NewmanDA. Crowdsourcing and personality measurement equivalence: a warning about countries whose primary language is not English. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015; 75:47–52.
45.
BuhrmesterM, KwangT, GoslingSD. Amazon's mechanical turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2011; 6:3–5.
46.
BerinskyAJ, HuberGA, LenzGS. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 2012; 20:351–368.
47.
ErikssonK, SimpsonB. Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risky lottery. Judgment and Decision Making, 2010; 5:159–163.
48.
TylkaTL, Wood-BarcalowNL. The Body Appreciation Scale-2: item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image, 2015; 12:53–67.
49.
HortonJJ, RandDG, ZeckhauserRJ. The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 2011; 14:399–425.
50.
PaolacciG, ChandlerJ, SternLN. Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 2010; 5:411–419.
HuL, BentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equations Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999; 6:1–55.
LenhartA, PurcellK, SmithA, et al. (2010) Social media and young adults. www.pewinternet.org/2010/02/03/social-media-and-young-adults/ (accessed August8, 2016).
57.
OrthU, RobinsRW, WidamanKF. Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012; 102:1271–1288.
58.
LeeHW, ChoiJ-S, ShinY-C, et al.Impulsivity in internet addiction: a comparison with pathological gambling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2012; 15:373–377.
59.
GrieveR, IndianM, WitteveenK, et al.Face-to-face or Facebook: can social connectedness be derived online?. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013; 29:604–609.
60.
IndianM, GrieveR. When Facebook is easier than face-to-face: social support derived from Facebook in socially anxious individuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 2014; 59:102–106.
61.
SubrahmanyamK, ReichSM, WaechterN, et al.Online and offline social networks: use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008; 29:420–433.
