With increasing frequency of Internet use among adolescents, there are growing concerns about their risk for becoming attached to these forms of communication and increased vulnerability for negative online experiences, including cyber victimization. The effect of these experiences on adolescent mental health is not well understood. In this study, we examine how Internet attachment is related to anxiety and depression and assess the mediating effect of cyber victimization on these associations. Participants included 1,151 middle school students (51.4 percent males) aged 10 to 16 (M = 12.7, SD = 0.93). Structural equation models show that greater Internet attachment was associated with more cyber victimization and greater symptoms of anxiety and depression. Cyber victimization mediated the associations between Internet attachment and anxiety and between Internet attachment and depression. Implications for online awareness efforts are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LenhartA. (2015) Teen, social media and technology overview 2015 (Pew Research Center Report 202.419.4372). www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015 (accessed March1, 2016).
2.
ChoS, SungM, ShinK, et al.Does psychopathology in childhood predict internet addiction in male adolescents?. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2013; 44:549–555.
3.
KelleciM, InalS. Psychiatric symptoms in adolescents with Internet use: comparison without Internet use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2010; 13:191–194.
4.
Van Den EijndenRJ, MeerkerkGJ, VermulstAA, et al.Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 2008; 44:655–665.
5.
HemphillSA, KotevksiA, HeerdeJA. Longitudinal associations between cyber-bullying perpetration and victimization and problem behavior and mental health problems in young Australians. Int J Public Health, 2015; 60:227–237.
6.
ModeckiKL, BarberBL, VernonL, et al.Mapping developmental precursors of cyber-aggression: trajectories of risk predict perpetration and victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2013; 42:651–661.
7.
NixonCL. Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 2014; 5:143–158.
8.
VandeboschH, Van CleemputK. Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 2009; 11:1349–1371.
9.
RoseCA, TynesBM. Longitudinal associations between cybervictimization and mental health among U.S. adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2015; 57:1–8.
10.
PeluchetteJV, KarlK, WoodC, et al.Cyberbullying victimization: do victims' personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem?. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 52:424–435.
11.
GuanSSA, SubrahmanyamK. Youth internet use: risks and opportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 2009; 22:351–356.
12.
MeerkerkGJ, Van Den EijndenRJ, VermulstAA, et al.The compulsive internet use scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:1–6.
13.
CôtéJE, LevineCG. (2014) Identity, formation, agency, and culture: a social psychological synthesis. Psychology Press.
14.
ValkenburgPM, PeterJ, SchoutenAP. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2006; 9:584–590.
15.
CummingsCM, CaporinoNE, KendallPC. Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: 20 years after. Psychological Bulletin, 2014; 140:816–845.
16.
HolfeldB, LeadbeaterBJ. The nature and frequency of cyber bullying behaviors and victimization experiences among young Canadian children. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2015; 30:116–135.
17.
TokunagaRS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:277–287.
18.
KowalskiRM, GiumettiGW, SchroederAN, et al.Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 2014; 140:1073–1137.
19.
PatchinJW, HindujaS. (2012). Cyberbullying: an update and synthesis on the research. In PatchinJW, HindujaS, eds. Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 13–36.
20.
MishnaF, Khoury-KassabriM, GadallaT, et al.Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies, and bully/victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 2012; 34:63–70.
21.
AfricakT, SiyahhanS, UzunhasanogluA, et al.Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:253–261.
22.
Erdur-BakerO. Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 2010; 12:109–125.
23.
HolfeldB. Perceptions and attributions of bystanders to cyber bullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 38:1–7.
24.
MishnaF, CookC, GadallaT, et al.Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 2010; 80:362–374.
25.
Gámez-GuadixM, OrueI, SmithPK, et al.Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2013; 53:446–452.
26.
LuHY. Sensation-seeking, Internet dependency, and online interpersonal deception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:227–231.
27.
PatchinJW, HindujaS. Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 2010; 80:614–621.
28.
HindujaS, PatchinJW. (2009) Bullying beyond the schoolyard: preventing and responding to cyber bullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29.
LovibondSH, LovibondPF. (1995) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation Monograph.
30.
HenryJD, CrawfordJR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005; 44:227–239.
31.
CampbellMA, SleePT, SpearsB, et al.Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies' perceptions of the harm they cause to others and their own mental health. School Psychology International, 2013; 34:613–629.
HuL, BentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999; 6:1–55.
34.
KlineRB. (2005) Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
WeiserEB. Gender differences in Internet use patterns and internet application preferences: a two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2000; 3:167–178.
36.
MeterDJ, BaumanS. When sharing is a bad idea: the effects of online social network engagement and sharing passwords with friends on cyberbullying involvement. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2015; 18:437–442.
37.
Gámez-GuadixM, BorrajoE, AlmendrosC. Risky online behaviors among adolescents: longitudinal relations among problematic internet use, cyberbullying perpetration, and meeting strangers online. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2016; 5:100–107.
38.
ShapkaJD, LawDM. Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2013; 42:723–738.
