Technology has the ability to enhance and enrich the lives of older adults by facilitating better interpersonal relationships. However, few studies have directly examined associations between technology use for social reasons and physical and psychological health among older adults. The current study examines the benefits of technology use in 591 older adults from the 2012 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (Mage = 68.18, SD = 10.75; 55.5% female). Social technology use was assessed through five technology-based behaviors (i.e., using e-mail, social networking sites, online video/phone calls, online chatting/instant messaging, using a smartphone). Attitudes toward the usability and benefits of technology use were also assessed. Older adults had generally positive attitudes toward technology. Higher social technology use was associated with better self-rated health, fewer chronic illnesses, higher subjective well-being, and fewer depressive symptoms. Furthermore, each of the links between social technology use and physical and psychological health was mediated by reduced loneliness. Close relationships are a large determinant of physical health and well-being, and technology has the potential to cultivate successful relationships among older adults.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CottenSR, FordG, FordS, et al.Internet use and depression among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28:496–499.
2.
CottenSR, FordG, FordS, et al.Internet use and depression among retired older adults in the United States: a longitudinal analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2014; 69:763–771.
3.
CarvalhoD, BessaM, OliveiraL, et al.New interaction paradigms to fight the digital divide: a pilot case study regarding multi-touch technology. Procedia Computer Science, 2012; 128–137.
4.
HillR, BettsLR, GardnerSE. Older adults' experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 48:415–423.
5.
NorrisP. (2001) Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
VromanKG, ArthanatS, LysackC. “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults' dispositions toward information communication technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 43:156–166.
7.
LagunaK, BabcockRL. Computer anxiety in young and older adults: implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Computers in Human Behavior, 1997; 13:317–326.
8.
BraunMT. Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013; 29:673–680.
9.
BarnardY, BradleyMD, HodgsonF, et al.Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013; 29:1715–1724.
10.
WagnerN, HassaneinK, HeadM. Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:870–882.
11.
CottenSR, AndersonWA, McCulloughBM. Impact of Internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2013; 15:e39.
12.
SumS, MathewsRM, HughesI, et al.Internet use and loneliness in older adults. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:208–211.
13.
MitznerTL, BoronJB, FaussetCB, et al.Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:1710–1721.
14.
OlsonKE, O'BrienMA, RogersWA, et al.Diffusion of technology: frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing International, 2011; 36:123–145.
15.
HeoJ, ChunS, LeeS, et al.Internet use and well-being in older adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2015; 18:268–272.
16.
ZhangF, KaufmanD. The impacts of social interactions in MMORPGs on older adults' social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 51, Part A:495–503.
17.
VošnerHB, BobekS, KokolP, et al.Attitudes of active older Internet users towards online social networking. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016; 55, Part A:230–241.
18.
ElliotAJ, MooneyCJ, DouthitKZ, et al.Predictors of older adults' technology use and its relationship to depressive symptoms and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2014; 69:667–677.
19.
HayesM, Stolk-CookeKv, MuenchF. Understanding Facebook use and the psychological affects of use across generations. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 49:507–511.
20.
RileyMW, RileyJW. (1994) Structural lag: past and future. In: RileyMW, KahnRL, FonerA, eds. Age and structural lag. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 15–36.
21.
RoweJW, KahnRL. Successful aging 2.0: conceptual expansions for the 21st century. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2015; 70:593–596.
22.
Holt-LunstadJ, SmithTB, BakerM, et al.Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2015; 10:227–237.
23.
UchinoBN. Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2006; 29:377–387.
24.
StephensMAP, FeketeEM, FranksMM, et al.Spouses' use of pressure and persuasion to promote osteoarthritis patients' medical adherence after orthopedic surgery. Health Psychology, 2009; 28:48–55.
25.
ChristakisNA, FowlerJH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2008; 358:2249–2258.
26.
HoppmannCA, GerstorfD. Spousal interrelations in old age—a mini-review. Gerontology, 2009; 55:449–459.
27.
JacksonSE, SteptoeA, WardleJ. The influence of partner's behavior on health behavior change: the English longitudinal study of ageing. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2015; 175:385–392.
28.
KimES, ChopikWJ, SmithJ. Are people healthier if their partners are more optimistic? The dyadic effect of optimism on health among older adults. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2014; 76:447–453.
29.
SonnegaA, FaulJD, OfstedalMB, et al.Cohort profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 2014; 43:576–585.
30.
WallaceRB, HerzogAR. Overview of the health measures in the Health and Retirement Study. The Journal of Human Resources, 1995; 30:S84–S107.
31.
HughesME, WaiteLJ, HawkleyLC, et al.A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 2004; 26:655–672.
32.
IdlerEL, BenyaminiY. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1997; 38:21–37.
33.
DienerE, EmmonsRA, LarsenRJ, et al.The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985; 49:71–75.
34.
RadloffLS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977; 1:385–401.
35.
BaronRM, KennyDA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986; 51:1173–1182.
36.
HayesAF. (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
ArbuckleJL. (2014) AMOS 22. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
38.
RoweJW, KahnRL. Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 1997; 37:433–440.
39.
KahnRL, AntonucciTC. (1981) Convoys of social support: a life-course approach. In: KieslerSB, MorganJN, OppenheimerVK, eds. Aging: social change. New York: Academic Press, pp. 383–405.
40.
AntonucciTC, KahnRL, AkiyamaH. (1989) Psychosocial factors and the response to cancer symptoms. In: YancikR, YatesJW, eds. Cancer in the elderly: approaches to early detection and treatment. New York: Springer, pp. 40–52.
41.
ChoiM, KongS, JungD. Computer and Internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: a meta-analysis. Healthcare Informatics Research, 2012; 18:191–198.
42.
HaganR, ManktelowR, TaylorBJ, et al.Reducing loneliness amongst older people: a systematic search and narrative review. Aging & Mental Health, 2014; 18:683–693.
43.
EisdorferC, CzajaSJ, LoewensteinDA, et al.The effect of a family therapy and technology-based intervention on caregiver depression. The Gerontologist, 2003; 43:521–531.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
