Popular video games often provide people with the option to play characters that are good or evil in nature, and yet, little is known about how individual differences in personality relate to the moral and ethical alignments people chose in their digital representations. We examined whether participants' pre-existing levels of moral disengagement and Big 5 scores predicted the alignments they selected for their avatar in video game play. Results revealed that men, relative to women, were more likely to play “bad guys” and that moral disengagement predicted this finding. Agreeableness and conscientiousness mediated the relationship between moral disengagement and alignment such that those higher in these two traits were more likely to play good characters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlascovichJ, LoomisJ, BeallAC, et al.Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 2002; 13:103–124.
2.
DunnRA, GuadagnoRE. My avatar and me? Gender and personality predictors of avatar-self descrepancy. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 29:97–106.
3.
GrahamLT, GoslingSD. Impressions of World of Warcraft players' personalities based on their usernames: interobserver consensus but no accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 2012; 46:599–603.
4.
GuadagnoRE, MuscanellNL, OkdieBM, et al.Even in virtual environments women shop and men build: a social role perspective on Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011; 27:304–308.
5.
NowakKL, RauhC. Choose your “buddy icon” carefully: the influence of avatar androgyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008; 24:1473–1493.
6.
YeeN. The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence, 2006; 15:309–329.
7.
SchroederR. (2002) The social life of avatars: presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. New York: Springer.
8.
AxelssonAS. (2002) Digital divide—status differences in virtual environments. In SchroederR, eds The social life of avatars: presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. London: Springer, pp. 188–204.
9.
OkdieBM, GuadagnoRE. (2007, May) Self-representation online: the impact of gender and extraversion. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
10.
TaylorTL. (2002) Living digitally: embodiment in virtual worlds. In SchroederR, ed. The social life of avatars; presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 40–62.
11.
VasalouA, JoinsonAN. Me, myself and I: the role of interactional context on self-presentation through avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:510–520.
12.
BackMD, SchmukleSC, EgloffB. How extraverted is honey. bunny77@ hotmail. de? Inferring personality from e-mail addresses. Journal of Research in Personality, 2008; 42:1116–1122.
13.
JohnOP, NaumannLP, SotoCJ. (2008) Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnOP, RobinsRW, PervinLA eds. Handbook of personality: theory and research. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 114–158.
14.
GabrielsK, BauwensJ, VerstryngeK. Second Life, Second Morality?. Virtual Worlds and Metaverse Platforms: New Communication and Identity Paradigms. 2011; 306.
15.
YoungG, WhittyMT. Games without frontiers: on the moral and psychological implications of violating taboos within multi-player virtual spaces. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:1228–1236.
16.
AquinoK, ReedAII. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002; 83:1423.
17.
BanduraA, BarbaranelliC, CapraraG, et al.Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996; 71:364–374.
18.
BanduraA. Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 2002; 31:101–119.
19.
MooreC, DetertJR, Klebe TreviñoL, et al.Why employees do bad things: moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 2012; 65:1–48.
20.
ShuLL, GinoF, BazermanMH. Dishonest deed, clear conscience: when cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2011; 37:330–349.
21.
BanduraA. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1999; 3:193–209.
22.
SchlenkerBR, ChambersJR, LeBM. Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 2012; 46:127–146.
23.
HymelS, Rocke-HendersonN, BonannoRA. Moral disengagement: a framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 2005; 8:1–11.
GygaxG, ArnesonD. (1997) Dungeons and Dragons [table top game]. Renton, WA: Wizards of the Coast.
26.
SchmittDP, RealoA, VoracekM, et al.(2008) Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008; 94:168.
