ProGReSS eNewsletter #1, August2013, p. 6. www.progressproject.eu/progress-enewsletter/ (accessed Oct.20, 2014).
2.
World Health Organization. (2010) Responsible life science research for global health security. A guidance document. Document No. WHO/HSE/GAR/BDP/2010.2. Geneva: WHO Press. www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/HSE_GAR_BDP_2010_2/en/ (accessed Nov.4, 2014).
3.
Committee on Laboratory Security and Personnel Reliability Assurance Systems for Laboratories Conducting Research on Biological Select Agents and Toxins, Board on Life Sciences, National Research Council. (2009) Responsible research with biological select agents and toxins. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44956/pdf/TOC.pdf (accessed Nov.4, 2014).
4.
EdenG, JirotkaM, StahlB. (2014) Responsible research and innovation in ICT: summary of key issues, recommendations, challenges and enablers. A report from the Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT (FRRIICT) project (EPSRC Grant No. EP/J000019/1). Oxford, UK: Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation, Computer Science Department, University of Oxford, p. 21. http://responsible-innovation.org.uk/torrii/sites/default/files/RRIinICT-landscapeStudy.pdf (accessed Nov.8, 2014).
5.
BentonL. HHS raises the stakes for patient data breaches. Healthcare IT News, November25, 2013. www.healthcareitnews.com/blog/hhs-raises-stakes-patient-data-breaches (accessed Nov.8, 2014).
6.
JaysonS. Social media raises privacy and ethical issues. USA Today, March12, 2014. www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/08/data-online-behavior-research/5781447/ (accessed Nov.4, 2014).
7.
Von SchombergR. (2011) Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In DusseldorpM, BeecroftR, eds. Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden. Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag. www.farinn.eu/pdf/prospects-for-technology-assessment-in-a-framework-of-responsible-research-and-innovation.pdf (accessed Nov.4, 2014).
8.
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science in Society. (2013) Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Report of the expert group on the state of art in Europe on responsible research and innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, p. 64. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf (accessed Nov.8, 2014).
9.
WrightD, GellertR, GutwirthS, et al. (2011) Precaution and privacy impact assessment as modes toward risk governance, In Von SchombergR, ed. Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. A report from the European Commission Services. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, p. 84. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/mep-rapport-2011_en.pdf (accessed Nov.4, 2014).
10.
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). (2014) Conducting privacy impact assessments. Code of practice. Version 1.0. Wilmslow, UK. http://ico.org.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/topic_guides/∼/media/documents/library/Data_Protection/Practical_application/pia-code-of-practice-final-draft.pdf (accessed Nov.4, 2014).
