This study used the frameworks of social compensation and social enhancement to examine how social anxiety and social support were related to college students' (N=443) use and perceptions of online mental health resources (Web sites and online support groups). Potential interactions between social support and social anxiety were also examined. Consistent with the social compensation hypothesis, perceived usefulness of Web sites was positively associated with social support. Perceived usefulness of online support groups was positively associated with social support when participants reported average or high, but not low, social anxiety. In contrast, previous use of Web sites was consistent with the social compensation hypothesis. Participants who reported less social support were more likely to have used a Web site for a mental or emotional problem. These findings suggest that college students' use and perceptions of online mental health resources vary as a function of social support and social anxiety, and that patterns suggestive of social compensation and social enhancement depend on whether perceptions or actual use of resources are examined. Combined with the significant interaction between social support and social anxiety on perceived usefulness of online support groups, these findings highlight the potential complexity of social compensation and enhancement phenomena.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American College Health Association. (2013) American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Data Report Spring 2013. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association. www.acha-ncha.org/docs/ACHA-NCHA-II_ReferenceGroup_DataReport_Spring2013.pdf (accessed Mar.20, 2014).
2.
HuntJ, EisenbergD. Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2010; 46:3–10.
3.
PatelV, FlisherAJ, HetrickS, et al.Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet, 2007; 369:1302–1313.
4.
SalzerMS. A comparative study of campus experiences of college students with mental illnesses versus a general college sample. Journal of American College Health, 2012; 60:1–7.
5.
GulliverA, GriffithsKM, ChristensenH. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 2010; 10:113.
6.
HorganA, SweeneyJ. Young students' use of the Internet for mental health information and support. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, 2010; 17:117–123.
7.
NealDM, CampbellAJ, WilliamsLY, et al.“I did not realize so many options are available”: Cognitive authority, emerging adults, and e-mental health. Library & Information Science Research, 2011; 33:25–33.
8.
ValkenburgPM, SchoutenAP, PeterJ. Adolescents' identity experiments on the internet. New Media & Society, 2005; 7:383–402.
9.
FoxS, JonesS. (2009) The social life of health information. www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Health_2009.pdf (accessed Mar.21, 2014).
10.
McKinleyW, RuppelEK. Exploring how perceived threat and self-efficacy contribute to college students' use and perceptions of online mental health resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 34:101–109.
11.
GowenLK. Online mental health information seeking in young adults with mental health challenges. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 2013; 31:97–111.
12.
OhE, JormAF, WrightA. Perceived helpfulness of websites for mental health information. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2009; 44:293–299.
13.
ChristensenH, GriffithsKM, JormAF. Delivering interventions for depression by using the Internet: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 2004; 328:265.
14.
MackinnonA, GriffithsKM, ChristensenH. Comparative randomised trial of online cognitive–behavioural therapy and an information website for depression: 12-month outcomes. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2008; 192:130–134.
15.
AlbrechtTL, GoldsmithDJ. (2003) Social support, social networks, and health. In ThompsonTL, DorseyAM, MillerKI, ParrottR, eds. Handbook of health communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 263–284.
16.
LearyMR. Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1983; 47:66–75.
17.
ChungJE. Social interaction in online support groups: preference for online social interaction over offline social interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013; 29:1408–1414.
18.
DesjarlaisM, WilloughbyT. A longitudinal study of the relation between adolescent boys and girls' computer use with friends and friendship quality: support for the social compensation or the rich-get-richer hypothesis?. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:896–905.
19.
ValkenburgPM, PeterJ. Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 2007; 43:267–277.
20.
PeterJ, ValkenburgPM, SchoutenAP. Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2005; 8:423–430.
21.
IndianM, GrieveR. When Facebook is easier than face-to-face: Social support derived from Facebook in socially anxious individuals. Personality & Individual Differences, 2014; 59:102–106.
22.
RuppelEK, BurkeTJ. Complementary channel use and the role of social competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2015; 20:37–51.
23.
TurnerJW, GrubeJA, MeyersJ. Developing an optimal match within online communities: an exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 2001; 51:231–251.
24.
ShawBR, HawkinsR, AroraN, et al.An exploratory study of predictors of participation in a computer support group for women with breast cancer. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 2006; 24:18–27.
25.
LedbetterAM. Measuring online communication attitude: instrument development and validation. Communication Monographs, 2009; 76:463–486.
26.
BerwickDM, MurphyJM, GoldmanPA, et al.Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Medical Care, 1991; 29:169–176.
27.
CuijpersP, SmitsN, DonkerT, et al.Screening for mood and anxiety disorders with the five-item, the three-item, and the two-item Mental Health Inventory. Psychiatry Research, 2009; 168:250–255.
28.
RumpfHJ, MeyerC, HapkeU, et al.Screening for mental health: validity of the MHI-5 using DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders as gold standard. Psychiatry Research, 2001; 105:243–253.
29.
FischerAR, ShawCM. African Americans' mental health and perceptions of racist discrimination: the moderating effects of racial socialization experiences and self-esteem. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1999; 46:395–407.
30.
ZimetGD, DahlemNW, ZimetSG, et al.The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1988; 52:30–41.
31.
AsbergK, RenkK. Comparing incarcerated and college student women with histories of childhood sexual abuse: the roles of abuse severity, support, and substance use. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, & Policy, 2013; 5:167–175.
32.
De LeoJA, WulfertE. Problematic Internet use and other risky behaviors in college students: an application of problem-behavior theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2013; 27:133–141.
33.
HamLS, HopeDA. Incorporating social anxiety into a model of college student problematic drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 2005; 30:127–150.
34.
MillerRS. On the nature of embarrassability: shyness, social evaluation, and social skill. Journal of Personality, 1995; 63:315–339.
35.
Blinn-PikeL, WorthySL, JonkmanJN. Disordered gambling among college students: a meta-analytic synthesis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2007; 23:175–183.
36.
GallagherR, SyskoH, ZhangB. (2001) National survey of counseling center directors. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Counseling Services.
37.
WrightPJ, McKinleyCJ. Services and information for sexually compulsive students on college counseling center websites: results from a national sample. Journal of Health Communication, 2010; 15:665–678.
38.
DeLormeDE, HuhJ, ReidLN. Source selection in prescription drug information seeking and influencing factors: applying the comprehensive model of information seeking in an American context. Journal of Health Communication, 2011; 16:766–787.
39.
RainsSA. Perceptions of traditional information sources and use of the World Wide Web to seek health information: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Journal of Health Communication, 2007; 12:667–680.
40.
KreftIGG, de LeeuwJ, AikenLS. The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1995; 30:1–21.
PoleyMEM, LuoS. Social compensation or rich-get-richer? The role of social competence in college students' use of the Internet to find a partner. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28:414–419.
43.
WrightKB, BellSB. Health-related support groups on the Internet: linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 2003; 8:39–54.
