Since the diffusion of Internet addiction has emerged in several cultural contexts, it seems relevant to study the properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT)—the most widely used screening instrument—across various cultures. In Italy, only one study has examined the IAT factor validity, and a comprehensive investigation of its psychometric characteristics is so far lacking. The purpose of this study was to perform a psychometric analysis of the Italian IAT. A total of 840 students (Mage=18.65 years, SD=3.85 years; 59% female) were recruited. Pertaining to scale dimensionality, the best-fit measurement model includes two factors: “Emotional and cognitive preoccupations with the Internet and social consequences” and “Loss of control and interference with daily duties” (χ2/df=3.38; comparative fit index=0.88; Tucker–Lewis Index=0.87; root mean square error of approximation=0.07), which together explained 45.59% of the variance. Internal consistency Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.83 to 0.86. Convergent validity was demonstrated, with significant correlations between IAT and Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 scores. The Italian version of the IAT was found to have good psychometric properties and a two-factorial structure. Identification of the IAT dimensions may help to define the construct better and develop intervention strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
YoungK. (1998) Caught in the Net: how to recognize the signs of Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: John Wiley.
2.
DavisRA. A cognitive–behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001; 17:187–195.
3.
LinSSJ, TsaiCC. Sensation seeking and internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 2002; 18:411–426.
4.
BeardKW, WolfEM. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2001; 4:377–383.
5.
Morahan-MartinJ. (2008) Internet abuse: emerging trends and lingering questions. In BarakA, ed. Psychological aspects of cyberspace: theory, research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–69.
6.
YoungKS, YueXD, YingL. (2011) Prevalence estimates and etiologic models of Internet addiction. In YoungKS, de AbreuCN, eds. Internet addiction: a handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, pp. 1–17.
7.
YoungK. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1996; 1:237–244.
8.
LortieCL, GuittonMJ. Internet addiction assessment tools: dimensional structure and methodological status. Addiction, 2013; 108:1207–1216.
9.
JelenchickLA, BeckerT, MorenoMA. Assessing the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) in US college students. Psychiatry Research, 2012; 196:296–301.
10.
WidyantoL, McMurranM. The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2004; 7:443–450.
11.
WidyantoL, GriffithsMD, BrunsdenV. A psychometric comparison of the Internet Addiction Test, the Internet-Related Problem Scale, and self-diagnosis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2011; 14:141–149.
12.
ChangMK, Man LawSP. Factor structure for Young's Internet Addiction Test: a confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008; 24:2597–25619.
13.
KhazaalY, BillieuxJ, ThorensG, et al.French validation of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:703–706.
14.
KorkeilaJ, KaarlasS, JaaskelainenM, et al.Attached to the web—harmful use of the Internet and its correlates. European Psychiatry, 2010; 25:236–241.
15.
PawlikowskiM, Altstötter-GleichC, BrandM. Validation and psychometric properties of a short version of Young's Internet Addiction Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 29:1212–1223.
16.
BarkeA, NyenhuisN, Kröner-HerwigB. The German version of the Internet Addiction Test: a validation study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2012; 15:534–542.
17.
FerraroG, CaciB, D'AmicoA, et al.Internet addiction disorder: an Italian study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2007; 10:170–175.
18.
ContiMA, JardimAP, HearstN, et al.Evaluation of semantic equivalence and internal consistency of a Portuguese version of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 2012; 39:106–110.
19.
PanayidesP, WalkerMJ. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) in a sample of Cypriot high school students: the Rasch measurement perspective. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2012; 8:327–351.
20.
HawiNS. Arabic validation of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2013; 16:200–204.
21.
ShafferHJ, HallMN, Vander BiltJ. “Computer addiction”: a critical consideration. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 2000; 70:162–168.
22.
CaplanSE. Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: a two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:1089–1097.
23.
AboujaoudeE, KoranLM, GamelN, et al.Potential markers for problematic Internet use: a telephone survey of 2,513 adults. CNS Spectrum, 2006; 11:750–755.
24.
LiuTC, DesaiRA, Krishnan-SarinS, et al.Problematic Internet use and health in adolescence: data from a high school survey in Connecticut. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2011; 72:836–845.
25.
Kaltiala-HeinoR, LintonenT, RimpeläA. Internet addiction? Potentially problematic use of the Internet in a population of 12–18 year-old adolescents. Addiction Research & Theory, 2004; 12:89–96.
26.
SiomosKE, DafouliED, BraimiotisDA, et al.Internet addiction among Greek adolescent students. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:653–657.
27.
ZboralskiK, OrzechowskaA, TalarowskaM, et al.The prevalence of computer and Internet addiction among pupils. Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej (Online), 2009; 63:8–12.
28.
CanbazS, SunterAT, PeksenY, et al.Prevalence of the pathological Internet use in a sample of Turkish school adolescents. Iran Journal of Public Health, 2009; 38:64–71.
29.
GhassemzadehL, ShahrarayM, MoradiA. Prevalence of Internet addiction and comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:731–733.
30.
CaoH, SunY, WanY, et al.Problematic Internet use in Chinese adolescents and its relation to psychosomatic symptoms and life satisfaction. BMC Public Health, 2011; 11:802.
31.
KoCH, YenJY, YenCF, et al.Factors predictive for incidence and remission of Internet addiction in young adolescents: a prospective study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007; 10:545–551.
32.
ParkSK, KimJY, ChoCB. Prevalence of Internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean adolescents. Adolescence, 2008; 43:895–909.
33.
VillellaC, MartinottiG, Di NicolaM, et al.Behavioral addictions in adolescents and young adults: results from a prevalence study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2011; 27:203–214.
34.
FioravantiG, PrimiC, CasaleS. Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in an Italian Sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2013; 16:761–766.
35.
BentlerPM. (1995) EQS structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software.
36.
TuckerLR, LewisC. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973; 38:1–10.
37.
SteigerJH. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1990; 25:173–180.
38.
KlineRB. (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
39.
BrowneMW, CudeckR. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenKA, LongJS, eds. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 136–162.
40.
ChouC, CondronL, BellandJC. A review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review, 2005; 17:363–388.
41.
Morahan-MartinJ, SchumacherP. Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000; 16:13–29.
42.
YoungKS. (2004) Internet addiction: the consequences of a new clinical phenomenon. In DoyleK, ed. American behavioral scientist: psychology and the new media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1–14.
43.
YellowleesPM, MarksS. Problematic Internet use or Internet addiction?. Computers in Human Behavior, 2007; 23:1447–1453.
44.
JiaR, JiaHH. Factorial validity of problematic Internet use scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:1335–1342.
