The purpose of this study is to assess any underlying links between personality, defense styles, Internet addiction disorder (IAD), and psychopathology in a college student sample. This is a cross-sectional study of fourth-year Greek Medical students who responded in a comprehensive test battery, which included validated questionnaires on IAD, personality traits, patterns of psychological defense styles, and psychopathology symptoms. A path model that was tested using Partial Least Squares (PLS) methodology showed that the defense styles employed by the students and certain personality traits (Impulsivity, Sensation Seeking, Neuroticism/Anxiety, and Aggression—Hostility) contributed to the prediction of variability in IAD, with IAD in turn predicting variability in overt psychopathology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
YoungKS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 1996; 1:237–244.
2.
KandellJJ. Internet addiction on campus: the vulnerability of college students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1998; 1:11–17.
3.
Morahan-MartinJ, SchumacherP. Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000; 16:13–29.
4.
ChouC, HsiaoM-C. Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students' case. Computers & Education, 2000; 35:65–80.
5.
NiemzK, GriffithsM, BanyardP. Prevalence of pathological Internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2005; 8:562–570.
6.
NiX, YanH, ChenS, et al.Factors influencing Internet addiction in a sample of freshmen university students in China. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:327–330.
7.
KoC, YenJ, ChenC, et al.Psychiatric comorbidity of Internet addiction in college students: an interview study. CNS Spectrums, 2008; 13:147.
8.
EysenckHJ, EysenckMW. (1985) Personality and individual differences: a natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.
9.
YanW, LiY, SuiN. The relationship between recent stressful life events, personality traits, perceived family functioning and Internet addiction among college students. Stress and Health, 2014; 30:3–11.
10.
LandersRN, LounsburyJW. An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 2006; 22:283–293.
11.
DongG, WangJ, YangX, et al.Risk personality traits of Internet addiction: a longitudinal study of Internet-addicted Chinese university students. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 2013; 5:316–321.
12.
FisounV, FlorosG, SiomosK, et al.Internet addiction as an important predictor in early detection of adolescent drug use experience—implications for research and practice. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 2012; 6:77–84.
13.
FlorosGD, SiomosK. Excessive Internet use and personality traits. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2014; 1:19–26.
14.
DavisRA, FlettGL, BesserA. Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: implications for pre-employment screening. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2002; 5:331–345.
15.
FlorosG, SiomosK. Patterns of choices on video game genres and Internet addiction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2012; 15:417–424.
16.
HyphantisT. The Greek version of the Defense Style Questionnaire: psychometric properties in three different samples. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 2010; 51:618–629.
17.
ZuckermanM, KuhlmanDM, JoiremanJ, et al.A comparison of three structural models for personality: the Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1993; 65:757–757.
18.
HyphantisT, AntoniouK, TomensonB, et al.Is the personality characteristic “impulsive sensation seeking” correlated to differences in current smoking between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients?. General Hospital Psychiatry, 2010; 32:57.
DoniasS, KarastergiouA, ManosN. Standardization of the symptom checklist-90-R rating scale in a Greek population. Psihiatrike, 1991; 2:42–48.
21.
HairJF, RingleCM, SarstedtM. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 2011; 19:139–152.
22.
SmartPLS [computer program]. Version 2.0. Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg, 2005.
23.
ZuckermanM. (2002) Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): an alternative five-factorial model. In: De RaadB, PeruginiM., eds. Big five assessment. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber, pp. 377–396.
24.
HettemaJ, NealeM, MyersJ, et al.A population-based twin study of the relationship between neuroticism and internalizing disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2006; 163:857–864.
25.
BondM. Empirical studies of defense style: relationships with psychopathology and change. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 2004; 12:263–278.
26.
FrangosCC, FrangosCC, SotiropoulosI. Problematic Internet use among Greek university students: an ordinal logistic regression with risk factors of negative psychological beliefs, pornographic sites, and online games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking., 2011; 14:51–58.
27.
DalbudakE, EvrenC, AldemirS, et al.Relationship of Internet addiction severity with depression, anxiety, and alexithymia, temperament and character in university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2013; 16:272–278.
28.
BernerJE, SantanderJ, ContrerasAM, et al.Description of Internet addiction among Chilean medical students: a cross-sectional study. Academic Psychiatry, 2014; 38:11–14.
