The Generalized Pathological Internet Use Scale (GPIUS2) assesses cognitive behavioral aspects of problematic Internet use. To date, the 15-item scale has only been available in English, and the aim of this study was to translate and validate a German version. An online sample (ON, n=1,041, age 24.2±7.2 years, 46.7% men) completed an Internet version of the translated GPIUS2, and a student sample (OF, n=841, age 23.5±3.0 years, 46.8% men) filled in a pencil and paper version. A third sample of 108 students (21.5±2.0 years, 25.7% men) completed the questionnaire twice to determine the 14-day retest reliability. Participants also answered questions regarding their Internet use habits (OF, ON) and depression, loneliness, and social anxiety (ON). The internal consistencies were α=0.91 (ON) and α=0.86 (OF). Item-whole correlations ranged from r=0.53 to r=0.69 (ON) and from r=0.39 to r=0.63 (OF). The 2 week retest reliability was rtt=0.85. Confirmatory factor analyses found a satisfactory fit for the factorial model proposed by Caplan for the original version. The GPIUS2 score correlated moderately with time spent on the Internet for private purposes in a typical week (ON: r=0.40; OF: r=0.36). Loneliness, depression, and social anxiety explained 46% of the variance in GPIUS2 scores. The German version of the GPIUS2 has good psychometric properties in a pencil and paper version as well as in a web-based format, and the observations regarding loneliness, depression, and social anxiety support the underlying model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Eurostat Database (2013) Households having access to the Internet, by type of connection. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=de&pcode=tin00073&plugin=0 (accessed Oct.29, 2013).
2.
ChenYF, PengSS. University students' Internet use and its relationships with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, psychosocial adjustment, and self-evaluation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:467–469.
3.
ChouC. Internet heavy use and addiction among Taiwanese college students: an online interview study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2001; 4:573–585.
4.
NalwaK, AnandAP. Internet addiction in students: a cause of concern. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2003; 6:653–656.
5.
SuhailK, BargeesZ. Effects of excessive Internet use on undergraduate students in Pakistan. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2006; 9:297–307.
6.
YoungKS. Internet addiction: a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 2004; 48:402–415.
7.
KrautR, PattersonM, LundmarkV, et al.Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American Psychologist, 1998; 53:1017–1031.
8.
ShapiraNA, GoldsmithTD, KeckPE, et al.Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2000; 57:267–272.
9.
ShawM, BlackDW. Internet addiction: definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs, 2008; 22:353–365.
10.
GreenfieldDN. Psychological characteristics of compulsive Internet use: a preliminary analysis. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1999; 2:403–412.
11.
MeerkerkGJ, Van Den EijndenRJ, VermulstAA, et al.The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:1–6.
12.
DavisRA. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001; 17:187–195.
13.
LuHY. Sensation-seeking, Internet dependency, and online interpersonal deception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:227–231.
14.
GhassemzadehL, ShahrarayM, MoradiAR. Prevalence of Internet addiction and comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:731–733.
15.
YoungKS. (1998) Caught in the net: how to recognize the signs of Internet addiction—and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: Wiley.
16.
CaplanSE. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 2002; 18:553–575.
17.
te WildtBT, PutzigI, DrewsM, et al.Pathological Internet use and psychiatric disorders: a cross-sectional study on psychiatric phenomenology and clinical relevance of Internet dependency. European Journal of Psychiatry, 2010; 24:136–145.
18.
WeinsteinA, LejoyeuxM. Internet addiction or excessive Internet use. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 2010; 36:277–283.
19.
CanbazS, SunterAT, PeksenY, et al.Prevalence of the pathological Internet use in a sample of Turkish school adolescents. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2009; 38:64–71.
20.
VillellaC, MartinottiG, Di NicolaM, et al.Behavioural addictions in adolescents and young adults: results from a prevalence study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2011; 27:203–214.
21.
MorenoMA, JelenchickL, CoxE, et al.Problematic Internet use among US youth: a systematic review. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2011; 165:797–805.
22.
CaplanSE. Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: a two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:1089–1097.
23.
LaRoseR, LinCA, EastinMS. Unregulated Internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation?. Media Psychology, 2003; 5:225–253.
24.
YoungKS. (1990) Caught in the net—Suchtgefahr Internet. München: Kösel Verlag.
25.
BarkeA, NyenhuisN, Kröner-HerwigB. The German version of the Internet Addiction Test: a validation study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2012; 15:534–542.
26.
RussellD, PeplauLA, CutronaCE. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1980; 39:472–480.
27.
DöringN, BortzJ. Psychometrische Einsamkeitsforschung: Deutsche Neukonstruktion der UCLA Loneliness Scale. Diagnostica, 1993; 39:224–239.
28.
KrohneHW, SchmukleSC, SpadernaH, et al.The state–trait depression scales: an international comparison. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 2002; 15:105–122.
29.
SpadernaH, SchmukleSC, KrohneHW. Report about the German adaptation of the State–Trait Depression Scales (STDS). Diagnostica, 2002; 48:80–89.
30.
LehrD, HillertA, SchmitzE, et al.Assessing depressive disorders using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) and State–Trait Depression Scales (STDS-T): a comparative analysis of cut-off scores. Diagnostica, 2008; 54:61–70.
31.
CollinsKA, WestraHA, DozoisDJ, et al.The validity of the brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2005; 19:345–359.
32.
LearyMR. A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1983; 9:371–375.
Morahan-MartinJ, SchumacherP. Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000; 16:13–29.
35.
TokunagaRS, RainsSA. An evaluation of two characterizations of the relationships between problematic Internet use, time spent using the Internet, and psychosocial problems. Human Communication Research, 2010; 36:512–545.
36.
HuangC. Internet use and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2010; 13:241–249.
37.
CeyhanAA, CeyhanE. Loneliness, depression, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:699–701.
38.
CohenJ. A power primer. Psychology Bulletin, 1992; 112:155–159.
39.
RivaG, TeruzziT, AnolliL. The use of the Internet in psychological research: comparison of online and offline questionnaires. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2003; 6:73–80.
40.
TurnerCF, KuL, RogersSM, et al.Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 1998; 280:867–873.
