Self-presentational motives underlying online social network (OSN) use were explored in samples of British and Japanese users. Self-expression, maintaining privacy, and attention seeking were strong motives in both samples; impression management and modesty were less strongly endorsed. Measures of independent and interdependent self-construal, as well as narcissism and modesty, were investigated as potential predictors of these motivations. Independent self-construal emerged as the most important predictor across both samples, with less independent participants showing more concern with image management and modesty. Participants with more interdependent self-construals were more concerned about maintaining privacy. There were some differences in the patterns of prediction between the samples, but overall self-construal measures contributed to the explanation of the majority of the motivations, whereas narcissistic or modest personality variables did not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HewKF. Students' and teachers' use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011; 27:662–676.
2.
PempeckTA, YermolayevaYA, CalvertSL. College students’ social network experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2009; 30:227–238.
3.
RossC, OrrES, SisicM, et al.Personality and motives associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:578–586.
4.
BuffardiLE, CampbellWK. Narcissism and social networking websites. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008; 24:473–481.
5.
Amichai-HamburgerY, VinitzkyZ. Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:1269–1296.
6.
GibbsJL, EllisonNB, HeinoRD. Self-presentation in online personals. Communication Research, 2006; 33:152–177.
7.
WaltherJB. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 2007; 23:2538–2557.
8.
WeisbuchM, IvcevicZ, AmbadyA. On being liked on the web and in the “real world”: consistency in first impressions across personal web pages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009; 45:573–576.
9.
BackMD, StopferJM, VazireS, et al.Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 2010; 21:372–374.
10.
MarkusHR, KityamaS. Culture and the self: implications for cognition and emotion. Psychological Review, 1991; 98:224–253.
11.
SingelisTM. The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994; 20:580–591.
12.
HofstedeG. (2001) Culture's consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
KitayamaS, ParkH, SevincerTA, et al.A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe and East Asia. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2009; 97:236–255.
14.
HeineSJ, LehmanDR, MarkusHR, et al.Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?. Psychological Review, 1999; 106:766–794.
15.
SedikidesC, GaertnerL, ToguchiY. Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2003; 84:60–79.
16.
ChenB, MarcusJ. Students' self-presentation on Facebook: an examination of personality and self-construal factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28:2091–2099.
17.
NadkarniA, HoffmanSG. Why do people use Facebook?. Personality & Individual Differences, 2012; 52:243–249.
18.
VasalouA, JoinsonAN, CourvosierD. Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of “true commitment” in Facebook. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 2010; 68:719–728.
19.
KimY, DongyoungS, ChoisSM. Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: a comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011; 227:365–372.
20.
MehdizadehS. Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 2010; 13:357–364.
21.
RyanT, XenosS. Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011; 27:1658–1664.
22.
WangJ-L, JacksonLA, ZhangD-J, et al.The relationships among the Big Five Personality factors, self-esteem, narcissism and sensation-seeking to Chinese University students' use of social networking sites (SNSs). Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28:2313–2319.
23.
KurmanJ, SriramN. Interrelationships among vertical and horizontal collectivism, modesty and self-enhancement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2002; 33:71–86.
24.
OweE. Unpacking cultural orientations: representations of the person and the self. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sussex, UK, 2013.
25.
AmesDR, RoseP, AndersonCP. The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 2006; 40:440–450.
26.
WhetstoneMR, OkunMA, CialdiniRB. (2002) The modest responding scale. Paper presented at the Convention of the APS, San Diego, CA.
27.
HamamuraT. Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality & Social Psychological Review, 2011; 16:3–14.
28.
MorisakiS. Self-presentation in Japan and the United States: the influence of self-construal and individualism/collectivism. Human Communication Studies, 2002; 20:46–67.
