Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper focuses on the Global Youth Coalition for HIV/AIDS (GYCA), a collaboration of young people who utilize the Internet to organize and inform the global youth HIV/AIDS social movement. We used a trans-disciplinary conceptual framework guided by the diffusion of innovations approach to explore factors that influence online participation among the coalition's members and to explain perceived effects of participation. We used a randomized stratified sampling strategy to conduct an online 7 week survey of GYCA's members (n=275). Descriptive statistics revealed that the majority of participants were from Africa (∼54%) and Asia (∼24%), with an average age of 27 years. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that participation in the e-consultations (R²=0.39, p<0.001) was influenced by a greater number of factors compared to the listserv (R²=0.20, p<0.001). Online participation significantly influenced perceptions about the coalition's social networking utility (R²=0.21, p<0.001). Perceived social networking utility significantly explained perceived effects on program areas such as knowledge sharing (R²=0.49, p<0.001), capacity building (R²=0.48, p<0.001), and political advocacy (R²=0.44, p<0.001). We concluded that a range of factors shapes participation in online health social movements. Initiatives such as GYCA need regular, intensive assessments to understand these factors for better tailoring their online activities to members' needs and for greater impact.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Khondker

. Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations, 2011; 8:675–679.

Harlow

. Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 2012; 14:225–243.

Lim

. Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 2012; 62:231–248.

Brecher

, Costello

, Smith

. (2009) Social movements 2.0. The nation. www.thenation.com/article/social-movements-20#axzz2bCJqCM7l (accessed Mar. 11, 2014).

Garrett

. Protest in an information society: a review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 2006; 9:202–224.

Juris

. The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalization movements. The Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 2005; 597:189–208.

Stein

. Social movement web use in theory and practice: a content analysis of US movement websites. New Media & Society, 2009; 11:749–771.

Seo

, Kim

, Yang

S-U

. Global activism and new media: A study of transnational NGOs' online public relations. Public Relations Review, 2009; 35:123–126.

Horst

. Free, social, and inclusive: appropriation and resistance of new media technologies in Brazil. International Journal of Communication, 2011; 5:437–462.

10.

Zhou

, Pinkleton

. Modeling the effects of political information source use and online expression on young adults' political efficacy. Mass Communication and Society, 2012; 15:813–830.

11.

Brunsting

, Postmes

. Social movement participation in the digital age: predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research, 2002; 33:525–554.

12.

Livingstone

, Bober

, Helsper

. Active participation or just more information? Young people's take-up of opportunities to act and interact on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 2005; 8:287–314.

13.

Miller

, Rainer

, Coley

. Predictors of engagement and participation in an on-line course. The Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2003; 6.

14.

Notley

, Tacchi

. Online youth networks: researching the experiences of “peripheral” young people in using new media tools for creative participation and representation. 3CMedia: Journal of Community, Citizen's & Third Sector Media & Communication, 2005; 1:73–81.

15.

Greenberg

. The diffusion of public health innovations. American Journal of Public Health, 2006; 96:209–210.

16.

Vijaykumar

, Banerjee

, Baker

. (2007) Evaluating e-consultations as catalysts for the youth HIV/AIDS movement. Cases in Public Health Communication & Marketing. www.casesjournal.org/volume1/peer=reviewed/cases_1_10.cfm (accessed Mar. 11, 2014).

17.

Shah

, Schmierbach

, Hawkins

, et al. Nonrecursive models of Internet use and community engagement: questioning whether time spent online erodes social capital. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2002; 79:964–987.

18.

Davis

. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989; 13:319–339.

19.

Davis

, Bagozzi

, Warshaw

. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 1989; 35:982–1003.

20.

Passy

. (2003) Social networks matter: but how? In Diani

, Mcadam

, eds. Social movements and networks: relational approaches to collective action. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 36–38.

21.

Okoror

, Airhihenbuwa

, Zungu

, et al. “My mother told me I must not cook anymore”—food, culture, and the context of HIV- and AIDS-related stigma in three communities in South Africa. International Quarterly of Community Health Educucation, 2007; 28:201–213.

22.

Horner

, Fireman

, Wang

. The relation of student behavior, peer status, race, and gender to decisions about school discipline using CHAID decision trees and regression modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 2010; 48:135–161.

23.

Raynes-Goldie

, Walker

. (2008) Our space: online civic engagement tools for youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 161–188.

Youth,New Media,and HIV/AIDS: Determinants of Participation in an Online Health Social Movement

Abstract

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References