Providing and seeking social support are important aspects of social exchange. New communication technologies, especially social network sites (SNSs), facilitate the process of support exchange. An increasing number of health organizations are using SNSs. However, how they provide and seek social support via SNSs has yet to garner academic attention. This study examined the types of social support provided and sought by health organizations on Twitter. A content analysis was conducted on 1,500 tweets sent by a random sample of 58 health organizations within 2 months. Findings indicate that providing informational and emotional support, as well as seeking instrumental support, were the main types of social support exchanged by health organizations through Twitter. This study provides a typology for studying social support exchanges by health organizations, and recommends strategies for health organizations regarding the effective use of Twitter.
VanceA. 2012. Facebook: The making of 1 billion users. www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-10-04/facebook-the-making-of-1-billion-users. 2012 Nov. 13.
3.
JavaA, SongX, FininTet al.2007. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. Paper presented at the WebKDD/SNA-KDD'07.
4.
Dugan. 2012. Twitter to surpass 500 million registered users on Wednesday. www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/500-million-registered-users_b18842. 2012 Nov. 13.
5.
CoulsonNS. Receiving social support online: an analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2005; 8:580–5.
6.
DrenteaP, Moren-CrossJ. Social capital and social support on the web: the case of an Internet mother site. Sociology of Health & Illness, 2005; 27:920–43.
7.
MoPKH, CoulsonNS. Exploring the communication of social support within virtual communities: a content analysis of messages posted to an online HIV/AIDS support group. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:371–4.
8.
QianY, MaoY. A content analysis of online social support behaviors of overseas Chinese prenatal and postnatal women. China Media Research, 2010; 6:43–55.
9.
LenhartAP, PurcellK, SmithAet al.2010. Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. http://web.pewinternet.org/∼/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf. 2012 Nov. 13.
Miller-Keane, O'TooleMT. 2005. Miller-Keane encyclopedia and dictionary of medicine, nursing and allied health. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
12.
JonasWB. 2005. Mosby's dictionary of complementary and alternative medicine. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
13.
CurrieD. More health departments nationwide embracing social media: use of tools rises. The Nation's Health, 2012; 42:1–18.
14.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Follow-me healthcare: patients look to health organizations that are always on. Top Health Industry 2011, 6. www.pwc.com/us/en/health-industries/publications/top-issue-06-mhealth.jhtml. 2012 Nov. 24.
15.
WatersR, BurnettE, LammAet al.Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 2009; 35:102–6.
16.
LovejoyK, SaxtonG. Information, community, and action: how non-profit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2012; 17:337–53.
17.
Kamel BoulusMK, WheelertS. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information & Library Journals, 2007; 24:2–23.
18.
ThoitsPA. 1985. Social support and psychological well-being: theoretical possibilities. SarasonIG, SarasonBR. Social support: theory, research and application. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 51–72.
19.
AdelmanMB. Cross-cultural adjustment: a theoretical perspective on social support. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1988; 12:183–204.
20.
HelgesonVS. Two important distinctions in social support: kind of support and perceived vs. received. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1993; 23:825–45.
21.
KaplanRM, HartwellSL. Differential effects of social support and social network on physiological and social outcomes in men and women with type II diabetes mellitus. Health Psychology, 1987; 6:387–98.
22.
WeinburgN, SchmaleJ. Online help: cancer patients participate in a computer-mediated support group. Health & Social Work, 1996; 21:24–32.
23.
GreenbergJ, MacAulayM. NPO 2.0? Exploring the web presence of environmental nonprofit organizations in Canada. Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition, 2009; 2:63–88.
24.
BortreeD, SeltzerT. Dialogic strategies and outcomes: an analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 2009; 35:317–9.
25.
BrionesR, KuchB, LiuBet al.Keeping up with the digital age: how the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 2011; 37:37–43.
26.
National Health Information Center. Alphabetical list. www.healthfinder.gov/findservices/organizations/orglisting.asp. 2012 Nov. 24.
27.
LearyMR. 1996. Self-presentation: impression management and interpersonal behavior. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark's.
