Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations

Abstract

Social media Websites (SMWs) are increasingly popular research tools. These sites provide new opportunities for researchers, but raise new challenges for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) that review these research protocols. As of yet, there is little-to-no guidance regarding how an IRB should review the studies involving SMWs. The purpose of this article was to review the common risks inherent in social media research and consider how researchers can consider these risks when writing research protocols. We focused this article on three common research approaches: observational research, interactive research, and survey/interview research. Concomitant with these research approaches, we gave particular attention to the issues pertinent to SMW research, including privacy, consent, and confidentiality. After considering these challenges, we outlined key considerations for both researchers and reviewers when creating or reviewing SMW IRB protocols. Our goal in this article was to provide a detailed examination of relevant ethics and regulatory issues for both researchers and those who review their protocols.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Moreno

, Fost

, Christakis

. Research ethics in the MySpace era. Pediatrics, 2008; 121:157–161.

Chew

, Eysenbach

. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One, 2010; 5:e14118.

Heaivilin

, Gerbert

, Page

et al. Public health surveillance of dental pain via Twitter. Journal of Dental Research, 2011; 90:1047–1051.

Prochaska

, Pechmann

, Kim

et al. Twitter=quitter? An analysis of Twitter quit smoking social networks. Tobacco Control, 2012; 21:447–449.

Paek

, Hove

, Kim

et al. Mechanisms of child abuse public service announcement effectiveness: roles of emotional response and perceived effectiveness. Health Communications, 2011; 26:534–545.

Baer

, Schwartz

. Teaching professionalism in the digital age on the psychiatric consultation-liaison service. Psychosomatics, 2011; 52:303–309.

Bowen

, Malaty

, Rodriguez

et al. Did General Douglas MacArthur have Parkinson disease? A video and archival analysis. Neurology, 2011; 76:1668–1672.

Papacharissi

. The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media Society, 2009; 11:199–220.

Lenhart

, Purcell

, Smith

et al. 2010. Social Media and Young Adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.

10.

Moreno

, Parks

, Zimmerman

et al. Display of health risk behaviors on MySpace by adolescents: prevalence and associations. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2009; 163:35–41.

11.

Christofides

, Muise

, Desmarais

. Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2009; 12:341–345.

12.

Ellison

, Steinfield

, Lampe

. The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” social capitol and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007; 12:1143–1168.

13.

Lewis

, Kaufman

, Christakis

. The taste for privacy: an analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008; 14:79.

14.

Mauri

, Cipresso

, Balgera

et al. Why is Facebook so successful? Psychophysiological measures describe a core flow state while using Facebook. Cyberpsychology Behaviors Social Network, 2012; 14:723–731.

15.

Pempek

, Yermolayeva

, Calvert

. College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2009; 30:227–238.

16.

Lewis

, Kaufman

, Gonzalez

et al. Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 2008; 30:330–342.

17.

Baym

, Boyd

. Socially mediated publicness: an introduction. Journal of Broadcast Electron, 2012; 56:320–329.

18.

Boyd

, Marwick

. Social privacy in networked publics: teens' attitudes, practices and strategies. A decade in internet time. Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, 2011.

19.

Weeks

, Convey

, Dickson-Gomez

et al. Changing drug users' risk environments: peer health advocates as multi-level community change agents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2009; 43:330–344.

20.

Geibel

, Luchters

, King'Ola

et al. Factors associated with self-reported unprotected anal sex among male sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2008; 35:746–752.

21.

Luchters

, Chersich

, Rinyiru

et al. Impact of five years of peer-mediated interventions on sexual behavior and sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya. BMC Public Health, 2008; 8:143.

22.

Lin

, Lu

. Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychology and Behavior Social Network, 2011; 14:565–570.

23.

Services UDoHaH. 2009. Code of Federal Regulation. In: HHS, ed. Vol45CFR 46.116.

24.

Zimmer

. “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 2010; 12:313–325.

25.

Tokunaga

. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010; 26:227–287.