As the movement to capitalize on unique affordances of video games for learning continues to grow, relatively little research in that area has examined how formal features, such as genre and game mechanics, draw and hold children's attention. This study examines which genres children prefer and the reasons why children prefer those genres by reporting on a video game uses and gratifications survey of children of various ages (n=685). Results show distinct patterns of game use and preference tied to typical child developmental ecology at each age, indicating that genre preference varies by age and developmental context. Implications for game research and educational gaming are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichC. 2004. Simulations and the future of learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
2.
GeeJP. 2007. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palmgrave/MacMillan.
3.
RitterfeldU, CodyM, VordererP. 2010. Serious games: mechanisms and effects. New York: Routledge/LEA.
4.
PrenskyM. 2000. Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
SherryJL, PachecoA. Matching computer game genres to educational outcomes. Electronic Journal of Communication, 2006; 16.
6.
RatanR, RitterfeldU. 2010. Classifying serious games. RitterfeldU, CodyM, VordererP. Serious games: mechanisms and effects. New York: Routledge/LEA, 10–24.
7.
BlumbergFC, IsmailerSS. 2009. What do children learn from playing digital games?RitterfeldU, CodyM, VordererP. Serious games: mechanisms and effects. New York: Routledge/LEA, 129–140.
8.
GreenbergBS, SherryJL, LachlanKet al.Orientations to video games among gender and age groups. Simulation and Gaming, 2010; 41:238–259.
9.
WartellaE, ReevesB. 1985. Historical trends in research on children and the media. GurevitchM, LevyMR. Mass communication review yearbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 160–175.
10.
RuggieroTE. Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 2000; 3:3–37.
11.
HaleS. A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed. Child Development, 1990; 61:653–663.
12.
HerzB, MerzW. Experiential learning and the effectiveness of economic simulation games. Simulation and Gaming, 1998; 29:238–250.
13.
MishraP, FosterA. 2007. The claims of games: a comprehensive review and directions for future research. CrawfordC, WillisDA, CarlsenRet al.Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference, Chesapeake, VA. AACE, 2227–2232.
14.
WolfMJP. 2002. Genre and the video game. WolfMJP. The medium of the video game. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 113–134.
15.
SquireK, BarnettM, GrantJM, HigginbothamT. 2004. Electromagnetism supercharged!: learning physics with digital simulation games. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on learning sciences, Santa Monica, CA, 513–520.
16.
MayerR, MautoneP, ProtheroW. Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2002; 94:171–183.
17.
SquireKD. Review: Sid Meier's civilization III. Simulation and Gaming, 2004; 35:135–140.
18.
FryeB, FragerAM. Civilization, colonization, SimCity: simulations for the social studies classroom. Learning and Leading with Technology, 1996; 24:21–23.
19.
LucasK, SherryJL. Sex differences in video game play: a communication-based explanation. Communication Research, 2004; 31:499–523.
20.
WindleM. The revised dimensions of temperament survey (DOTS-R): Simultaneous group confirmatory factor analysis for adolescent gender groups. Psychological Assessments: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1992; 4:228–234.
21.
RideooutVJ, FoehrUG, RobertsDF. 2010. Generation M2: media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
22.
SherryJL. Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 2004; 14:328–347.
