Relationship dissolution now occurs through technologies like text messaging, e-mail, and social networking sites (SNS). Individuals who experience relationship dissolution via technology may differ in their attachment pattern and gender role attitudes from those who have not had that experience. One hundred five college students (males=21 and females=84) completed an online questionnaire about technology-mediated breakups, attachment style, and gender role attitudes. More than a quarter of the sample had experienced relationship dissolution via technology. Attachment anxiety predicted those subject to technology-mediated breakups. Attachment avoidance and less traditional gender roles were associated with increased likelihood of technology use in relationship dissolution. Implications are discussed in regards to future research and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JohnsonA, HaighMM, BeckerJHet al.College students' use of relational management strategies in email in long-distance and geographically close relationships. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008; 13:381–404.
2.
BlaisJJ, CraigWM, PeplerDet al.Adolescents online: the importance of Internet activity choices to salient relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2008; 37:522–536.
3.
RamirezAR, BroneckK. ‘IM me’: instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2009; 26:291–314.
4.
PettigrewJ. Text messaging and connectedness with close interpersonal relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 2009; 45:697–716.
5.
TokunagaRS. Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011; 27:705–713.
6.
SimonRW, BarrettAE. Nonmarital romantic relationships and mental health in early adulthood: does the association differ for women and men?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 2010; 51:168–182.
7.
RhoadesGK, Kamp DushCM, AtkinsDCet al.Breaking up is hard to do: the impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 2011; 25:366–374.
8.
SbarraDA, EmeryRE. The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 2005; 12:213–232.
9.
ZimmermanC. 2009. Dissolution of relationships, breakup strategies. ReisHT, SprecherS. Encyclopedia of human relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 434–435.
10.
DykasMJ, CassidyJ. Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: theory and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 2011; 137:19–46.
11.
BermanW, SperlingM. 1994. The structure and function of adult attachment. SperlingM, BermanW. Attachment in adults: clinical and developmental perspectives. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 3–28
12.
HazanC, ShaverPR. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987; 52:511–524.
13.
FraleyRC. Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2002; 6:123–151.
14.
BrennanKA, ClarkCL, ShaverPR. 1998. Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: an integrative overview. SimpsonJA, RholesWS. Attachment theory and close relationships. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 46–76.
15.
CampbellL, SimpsonJA, BoldryJet al.Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: the role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005; 88:510–531.
16.
GuerreroLK. Attachment-style differences in intimacy and involvement: a test of the four-category model. Communication Monographs, 1996; 63:269–292.
17.
LeeS, MeszarosPS, ColvinJ. Cutting the wireless cord: college student cell phone use and attachment to parents. Marriage and Family Review, 2009; 45:717–739.
18.
BuoteVM, WoodE, PrattM. Exploring similarities and differences between online and offline friendships: the role of attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:560–567.
19.
JinB. Peña JF. Mobile communication in romantic relationships: mobile phone use, relational uncertainty, love, commitment, and attachment styles. Communication Reports, 2010; 23:39–51.
20.
WeisskirchRS, DeleviR. “Sexting” and adult romantic attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011; 27:1697–1701.
21.
AubeJ, KoestnerR. Gender characteristics and relationship adjustment: another look at similarity-complementarity hypotheses. Journal of Personality, 1995; 63:879–904.
22.
FanLP, MariniMM. Influences of gender–role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research, 2000; 29:258–283.
23.
StroughJ, LeszczynskiJ, NeelyTLet al.From adolescence to later adulthood: femininity, masculinity, and androgyny in six age groups. Sex Roles, 2007; 57:385–396.
24.
DeLucia-WaackJL, GerrityDA, TaubDJet al.Gender, gender role identity and type of relationship as predictors of relationship behavior and beliefs in college students. Journal of College Counseling, 2001; 4:32–48.
25.
PietromonacoPR, CarnelleyKB. Gender and working models of attachment: consequences for perceptions of self and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 1994; 1:63–82.
26.
SprecherS. Two sides to the breakup dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 1994; 1:199–222.
27.
BurnS, WardA. Men's conformity to traditional masculinity and relationship satisfaction. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2005; 6:254–263.
28.
FraleyRC, WallerNG, BrennanKA. An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000; 78:350–365.
29.
SpenceJT, HahnED. The attitudes toward women scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1997; 21:17–34.
30.
VicaryAM, FraleyR. Choose your own adventure: attachment dynamics in a simulated relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007; 33:1279–1291.
31.
FeeneyJA, NollerP. Attachment style and romantic love: relationship dissolution. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1992; 44:69–74.
32.
SimpsonJA, RholesWS, NelliganJS. Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: the role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992; 62:434–446.
