This study examined how creating a human presence in organizational online communication affects organization–public relationships and publics' favorable behavioral intentions to engage in word-of-mouth (WOM) and dialogic communications. Four hypotheses were tested in the context of Twitter through a 2×2 (presence: human vs. organizational×organization type: nonprofit vs. for-profit) within-subjects design. The results revealed that conversational human voice was perceived to be higher for Twitter pages of organizations with a human presence than for those with an organizational presence. Providing a human presence on social media through the use of social media managers' avatars and names appeared to promote favorable organization–public relationships and positive WOM communication. However, dialogic communication intentions did not significantly differ between organizations incorporating a human presence versus an organizational presence into their Twitter pages. The proposed dynamic role of human presence versus organizational presence adds a new perspective as to how organizations can take better advantage of interpersonal aspects of social media.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SweetserKD. A losing strategy: the impact of nondisclosure in social media on relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2010; 22:288–312.
2.
WatersRD, BurnettE, LammAet al.Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 2009; 35:102–106.
3.
TaylorM, KentML, WhiteWJ. How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 2001; 27:263–284.
4.
KelleherT. Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 2009; 59:172–188.
5.
KelleherT, MillerB. Organizational blogs and the human voice: relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006; 11:395–414.
6.
YangSU, LimJS. The effects of blog-mediated public relations (BMPR) on relational trust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2009; 21:341–359.
7.
Nielsen WireJanuary22, 2010. Led by Facebook, Twitter, global time spent on social media sites up 82% year over year. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/led-by-facebook-twitter-global-time-spent-on-social-media-sites-up-82-year-over-year/. 2010 Oct 27.
8.
Burson-MarstellerFebruary23, 2010. The global social media check-up 2010. www.burson-marsteller.com/Innovation_and_insights/blogs_and_podcasts/BM_Blog/Documents/Burson-Marsteller%202010%20Global%20Social%20Media%20Check-up%20white%20paper.pdf. 2011 Jan 8.
9.
SweetserKD, MetzgarE. Communicating during crisis: use of blogs as a relationship building tool. Public Relations Review, 2007; 33:340–342.
10.
YangSU, KangM, JohnsonP. Effects of narratives, openness to dialogic communication, and credibility on engagement in crisis communication through organizational blogs. Communication Research, 2010; 37:473–497.
11.
ShortJ, WilliamsE, ChristieB. 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley and Sons.
12.
TuCM. The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 2002; 1:34–45.
13.
BioccaF, HarmsC, BurgoonJK. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence, 2003; 12:456–480.
14.
FischerCS. “Touch someone”: the telephone industry discovers sociability. Technology and Culture, 1988; 29:32–61.
15.
GefenD, StraubDW. Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 2004; 32:407–424.
16.
GunawardenaCN, ZittleFJ. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within acomputer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1997; 11:8–26.
17.
KaplanAM, HaenleinM. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 2010; 53:59–68.
18.
CuiN, WangT, XuS. The influence of social presence on consumers' perceptions of the interactivity of Web sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2010; 11:36–49.
19.
BioccaF, HarmsC. Defining and measuring social presence: Contribution to the Networked minds theory and measure. Proceedings of Presence, 2002; 7–36.
20.
HonL, GrunigJE. 1999. Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
21.
KiE, HonLC. Testing the linkages among the organization-public relationship and attitudes and behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2007; 19:1–23.
22.
LedinghamJA. Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2003; 15:181–198.
23.
LedinghamJA, BruningSD. 2000. A longitudinal study of organization-public relationship dimensions: defining the role of communication in the practice of relationship management. LedinghamJA, BruningSD. Public relations as relationship management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 55–69.
24.
AndersonE, WeitzB. Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial dyads. Marketing Science, 1989; 8:310–323.
25.
KiE, HonLC. Reliability and validity of organization-public relationship measurement and linkages among relationship indicators in a membership organization. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 2007; 84:419–438.
26.
RoloffME. 1981. Interpersonal communication: a social exchange approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
MorganRM, HuntSD. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 1994; 58:20–38.
28.
ThibautJW, KelleyHH. 1959. The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.
29.
KentML, TaylorM. Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 1998; 24:321–334.
30.
BroomGM, CaseyS, RitcheyJ. Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 1997; 9:83–98.
31.
RybalkoS, SeltzerT. Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 2010; 36:336–341.
32.
WestbrookRA. Product/consumption based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 1987; 24:258–270.
33.
de MatosCA, RossiCAV. Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2008; 36:578–596.
34.
Harrison-WalkerLJ. The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research, 2001; 4:60–75.
35.
HongSY, YangSU. Effects of reputation, relational satisfaction, and customer-company identification on positive word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2009; 21:381–403.
36.
LuoX, HomburgC. Neglected outcomes of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 2007; 71:133–149.
ReevesB, GeigerS. Designing experiments that assess psychological responses. LangA. Measuring psychological responses to media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 165–180.
40.
BettencourtLA. Customer voluntary performance: customers as partners in service delivery. Journal of Retailing, 1997; 73:383–406.
41.
BrownTJ, BarryTE, DacinPA, GunstRF. Spreading the word: investing antecedents of consumers' positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2005; 33:123–138.
TabachnickBG, FidellLS. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
44.
AakerJ, VohsKD, MogilnerC. Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 2010; 37:224–237.
45.
BermanSJ, AbrahamS, BattinoBet al.New business models for the new media world. Strategy & Leadership, 2007; 35:23–30.
46.
PhelpsJE, LewisR, MobilioLet al.Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research, 2004; 45:333–348.
47.
ScottDM. 2010. The new rules of marketing and PR: How to use social media, blogs, news releases, online video, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
