Prior research on predictors of social network site (SNS) use has mainly focused on the Big Five, narcissism, and self-esteem. Results have been inconsistent, and variance explained was rather low. Need for popularity (NfP) might be a better predictor of SNS use, because SNSs are ideal venues for people with a high NfP. Study 1 tested NfP, self-esteem, need to belong, entitlement, and vanity as predictors for a range of SNS behaviors; Study 2 replaced entitlement and vanity with narcissism and added the Big Five as predictors. SNS behaviors assessed were grooming, strategic self-presentation, profile enhancement, disclosure of feelings, routine use of SNS, and number of friends. Results showed that NfP was the strongest and most consistent predictor of SNS behaviors. This pattern indicates that NfP plays an important role in SNSs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BuffardiLE, CampbellWK. Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008; 34:1303–1314.
2.
MehdizadehS. Self-Presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2010; 13:357–364.
3.
WehrliS. 2008. Personality on social network sites: An application of the five factor model. Zurich: ETH Sociology(Working Paper No. 7).
4.
GoslingSD, GaddisS, VazireS. Personality impressions based on Facebook profiles. Paper presented at the ICWSM, Boulder, CO, 2007.
5.
KrämerNC, WinterS. Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 2008; 20:106–116.
6.
McCraeRR, CostaPT. 1999. A five-factor theory of personality. PervinL, JohnO. Handbook of personality: theory and research. New York: Guilford Press, 139–153.
7.
PaunonenS. Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003; 84:411–422.
8.
WilsonK, FornasierS, WhiteKM. Psychological predictors of young adults' use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2010; 13:173–177.
9.
RossC, OrrES, SisicMet al.Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:578–586.
10.
BibbyP. 2008. Dispositional factors in the use of social networking sites: Findings and implications for social computing research. Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 5075:392–400.
11.
ZywicaJ, DanowskiJ. The faces of Facebookers: investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008; 14:1–34.
12.
ChristofidesE, MuiseA, DesmaraisS. Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes?CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2009; 12:341–345.
13.
GangadharbatlaH. Facebook Me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and Internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration's attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2008; 8:1–28.
14.
SantorDA, MesserveyD, KusumakarV. Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2000; 29:163–182.
15.
CampbellWK, RudichEA, SedikidesC. Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002; 28:358–368.
16.
WaltherJB. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 1996; 23:3–43.
17.
WaltherJB, SlovacekCL, TidwellLC. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 2001; 28:105–134.
18.
SiibakA. Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2009; 3.
19.
UtzS, BeukeboomC. The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2011; 16:511–527.
20.
TufekciZ. Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace. Information, Communication and Society, 2008; 11:544–564.
21.
BaumeisterR, LearyM. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1995; 117:497–529.
22.
AmesDR, RoseP, AndersonCP. The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 2006; 40:440–450.
23.
UtzS, KrämerN. The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2009; 3. http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009111001&article=2
24.
EllisonN, SteinfieldC, LampeC. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students' use of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007; 12:1143–1168.
25.
LearyM, KellyK, CottrellCet al.2001. Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Wake Forest University: Winston-Salem, NC.
26.
RosenbergM. 1965. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
BrownR, BudzekK, TamborskiM. On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2009; 35:951–964.
28.
CampbellW, BonacciA, SheltonJet al.Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2004; 83:29–45.
29.
EganV, McCorkindaleC. Narcissism, vanity, personality and mating effort. Personality and Individual Differences, 2007; 43:2105–2115.
30.
GoslingSD, RentfrowPJ, SwannWB. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 2003; 37:504–552.
31.
UtzS. Social network site use among Dutch students: effects of time and platform. ComunelloF. Networked sociability and individualism. technology for personal and professional relationships. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
32.
ShawLH, GantLM. In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2002; 5:157–171.
33.
KimJ, LeeJER. The Facebook path to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2011; 14:359–364.
