Problematic Internet use (PIU) is becoming a prevalent and serious problem among college students. Rates of PIU are higher in men, which may be due to psychological variables, such as comorbid psychological disorders and beliefs about one's body. We examined the ability of psychological distress, coping style, and body esteem to predict levels of PIU in men and women in a sample of 425 undergraduate students (46.8 percent male; mean age = 19.0, SD = 1.7). For men, phobic anxiety, wishful thinking, and overweight preoccupation were significant predictors of increased PIU. For women, depression, keeping to oneself, and decreased tension reduction were associated with increased PIU. The findings suggest that men and women may have different psychological reasons for excessive Internet use, including different types of psychological distress and coping styles. Unlike women, men may use the Internet because of weight concerns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
YoungK. Internet addiction: A new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 2004; 48:402–415.
2.
KimH, DavisK. Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic Internet use: Evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of Internet activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:490–500.
3.
ShapiraN, LessigM, GoldsmithTet al.Problematic Internet use: Proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depression and Anxiety, 2003; 17:207–216.
4.
HaJ, KimS, BaeSet al.Depression and Internet addiction in adolescents. Psychopathology, 2007; 40:424–430.
5.
NiX, YanH, ChenSet al.Factors influencing Internet addiction in a sample of freshman university students in China. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:327–330.
6.
JenaroC, FloresN, Gómez-VelaMet al.Problematic Internet and cell-phone use: Psychological behavioral, and health correlates. Addiction Research & Theory, 2007; 15:309–320.
7.
YoungK. 1999. Evaluation and treatment of Internet addiction. KellerPA, RittLG. Innovations in clinical practice: A source book, 17. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange, 19–31.
8.
YoungK. 1998. Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction–and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: J. Wiley.
9.
FortsonB, ScottiJ, ChenYet al.Internet use, abuse, and dependence among students at a Southeastern Regional University. Journal of American College Health, 2007; 56:137–144.
10.
ShererK. College life on-line: Healthy and unhealthy Internet use. Journal of College Student Development, 1997; 38:655–665.
11.
NiemzK, GriffithsM, BanyardP. Prevalence of Pathological Internet Use among University Students and Correlations with Self-Esteem, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and Disinhibition. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2005; 8:562–570.
12.
CaoF, SuL. Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: Prevalence and psychological features. Child: Care, Health and Development, 2006; 33:275–281.
13.
CeyhanA. Predictors of problematic Internet use on Turkish university students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:363–366.
14.
BoiesS, KnudsonG, YoungJ. The Internet, sex, and youths: Implications for sexual development. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 2004; 11:343–363.
15.
TsaiC, LinC. Taiwanese adolescents' perceptions and attitudes regarding the Internet: Exploring gender differences. Adolescence, 2004; 39:725–734.
16.
ChouC, CondronL, BellandJ. A Review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review, 2005; 17:363–388.
17.
MorganC, CottenS. The relationship between Internet activities and depressive symptoms in a sample of college freshmen. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2003; 6:133–142.
18.
ShawM, BlackD. Internet addiction: Definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs, 2008; 22:353–365.
19.
YangC, ChoeB, BaityMet al.SCL-90-R and 16PF profiles of senior high school students with excessive Internet use. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 2005; 50:407–414.
20.
ÖzcanN, BuzluS. Internet use and its relation with the psychosocial situation for a sample of university students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007; 10:767–772.
21.
WhangL, LeeS, ChangG. Internet over-users' psychological profiles: A behavior sampling analysis on Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2003; 6:143–150.
22.
ShawL, GantL. Users divided? Exploring the gender gap in Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2002; 5:517–527.
23.
BakerJ, MooreS. Distress, coping, and blogging: Comparing new Myspace users by their intention to blog. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:81–85.
24.
CaplanS. Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007; 10:234–242.
25.
KoC, YenJ, YenCet al.Factors predictive for incidence and remission of Internet addiction in young adolescents: A prospective study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007; 10:545–551.
26.
American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. 4thText Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
27.
EndlerN, ParkerJ. Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotion, and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 1994; 6:50–60.
28.
AnshelM, KangM, MiesnerM. The approach-avoidance framework for identifying athletes' coping style as a function of gender and race. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2010; 51:341–349.
29.
KiddS, CarrollM. Coping and suicidality among homeless youth. Journal of Adolescence, 2007; 30:283–296.
30.
SpadaM, LangstonB, NikčevićAet al.The role of metacognitions in problematic Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008; 24:2325–2335.
31.
MilaniL, OsualdellaD, Di BlasioP. Quality of interpersonal relationships and problematic Internet use in adolescence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:681–684.
32.
KandellJ. Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1998; 1:11–17.
33.
CashT, SantosM, WilliamsE. Coping with body-image threats and challenges: Validation of the body image coping strategies inventory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2005; 58:191–199.
34.
CashT. PruzinskyT. 2002. Body image: A handbook of theory research, and clinical practice. New York: Guilford.
35.
JonesD, CrawfordJ. The peer appearance culture during adolescence: Gender and body mass variations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2006; 35:257–269.
36.
CrockerJ, LuhtanenR, CooperMet al.Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003; 85:894–908.
37.
ArmstrongL, PhillipsJ, SalingL. Potential determinants of heavier Internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2000; 53:537–550.
38.
van den BergP, MondJ, EisenbergMet al.The link between body dissatisfaction and self-esteem in adolescents: Similarities across gender, age, weight status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2010; 47:290–296.
39.
YoungK, RogersR. The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1998; 1:25–28.
40.
KimJ, LaRoseR, PengW. Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationships between Internet use and psychological well being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:451–455.
41.
GibsonS, ThomasC. Self-rated competence, current weight, and body-image among college women. Psychological Reports, 1991; 69:336–338.
42.
ZaitsoffS, FehonD, GriloC. Social competence and social-emotional isolation and eating disorder psychopathology in female and male adolescent psychiatric inpatients. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2009; 9:219–228.
43.
CaplanS. A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 2005; 55:721–736.
44.
CaplanS. Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 2003; 30:625–648.
45.
SegrinC. A meta-analytic review of social skill deficits in depression. Communication Monographs, 1990; 57:292–308.
46.
MuthJ, CashT. Body-image attitudes: What difference does gender make?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1997; 27:1438–1452.
47.
FrederickD, ForbesG, GrigorianKet al.The UCLA body project I: Gender and ethnic differences in self-objectification and body satisfaction among 2,206 undergraduates. Sex Roles, 2007; 57:317–327.
48.
HalliwellE, DittmarH. A Qualitative investigation of women's and men's body image concerns and their attitudes toward aging. Sex Roles, 2003; 49:675–684.
49.
StraeterS. 2003MarchBody image and acculturation status, eating disorder symptomatology, psychopathology and self-esteem in Latina college students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63.
50.
DerogatisLR. 1994. SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual, III. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems, Inc.
51.
FolkmanS, LazarusR. If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985; 48:150–170.
52.
CashT. 2000. The multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire (MBSRQ) users manual (3rd revision)Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion University.
53.
HolleC. Male body image: Self-perceived weight status and avoidance of body exposure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2004; 99:853–880.
54.
GriloC, MashebR, BrodyMet al.Binge eating and self-esteem predict body image dissatisfaction among obese men and women seeking bariatric surgery. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2005; 37:347–351.
55.
TiggemannM, WinefieldH, WinefieldAet al.Gender differences in the psychological correlates of body-weight in young adults. Psychology & Health, 1994; 9:345–351.
56.
GroganS, RichardsH. Body image: Focus groups with boys and men. Men and Masculinities, 2002; 4:219–232.
57.
LatnerJ, StunkardA, WilsonG. Stigmatized students: Age, sex, and ethnicity effects in the stigmatization of obesity. Obesity Research, 2005; 13:1226–1231.
58.
JacksonL, ErvinK, GardnerPet al.Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 2001; 44:363–379.
59.
BlockJJ. Prevalence underestimated in problematic Internet use study. CNS Spectrums, 2006; 12:14–15.
60.
CrowneD, MarloweD. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960; 24:349–354.
61.
HuangC, LiaoH, ChangS. Social desirability and the clinical self-report inventory: Methodological reconsideration. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1998; 54:517–528.
