The notion that an avatar can elicit a sense of emotional involvement or connection on the part of a user in asynchronous online communication was explored through a pair of content analyses of a popular online question-and-answer bulletin board. In the first study, questions accompanied by an avatar not only received more answers than questions without an avatar, but the answers were more likely to be characterized by expressions of empathy. In the second study, a preference for answering questions accompanied by an avatar was found to be associated with interpersonal, altruistic motives for answering questions. Results are discussed in terms of presence and alternative explanations, as well as practical implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnettaLA, HolmesA. Creating presence and community in a synchronous virtual learning environment using avatars. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2006; 3:27–44.
2.
NowakKL, BioccaF. The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 2003; 12:481–94.
3.
SuzukiLK, CalzoJP. The search for peer advice in cyberspace: An examination of online teen bulletin boards about health and sexuality. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2004; 25:685–98.
4.
HsiungRC. The best of both worlds: An online self-help group hosted by a mental health professional. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2000; 3:935–50.
5.
BundeM, SulsJ, MartinRet al.Hystersisters online: Social support and social comparison among hysterectomy patients on the Internet. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2006; 31:271–8.
6.
HiltzSR, TuroffM. 2008. The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
DimmickJ, KlineS, StaffordL. The gratification niches of personal e-mail and the telephone: Competition, displacement, and complementarity. Communication Research, 2000; 27:227–48.
8.
CorrellS. The ethnography of an electronic bar: The Lesbian CaféJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1995; 24:270–98.
9.
VasalouA, JoinsonA, BanzigerTet al.Avatars in social media: Balancing accuracy, playfulness, and embodied messages. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 2008; 66:801–11.
10.
LeeKM. Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 2004; 14:27–50.
11.
BenteG, RüggenbergS, KrämerNCet al.Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 2008; 34:287–318.
12.
RubinAM, PerseEM, PowellRA. Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 1985; 12:155–80.
13.
GilesDC. Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 2002; 4:279–305.
14.
HoernerJ. 1999. Scaling the web: A parasocial interaction scale for World Wide Web sites. SchumannDW, ThorsonE. Advertising and the World Wide Web. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 135–47.
15.
RubinAM, PerseEM. Audience activity and television news gratifications. Communication Research, 1987; 14:58–84.
16.
DavisMH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1983; 44:113–26.
17.
TettegahS, AndersonCJ. Pre-service teachers' empathy and cognitions: Statistical analysis of text data by graphical models. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2007; 32:48–82.
18.
AndersonSE, WilliamsLJ. Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996; 81:282–96.
19.
NgKY, VanDyneL. Antecedents and performance consequences of helping behavior in work groups: A multilevel analysis. Group & Organization Management, 2005; 30:514–40.
20.
CokeJS, BatsonCD, McDavisK. Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1978; 36:752–66.
21.
SlaterM, SteedA. 2002. Meeting people virtually: Experiments in shared virtual environments. SchroederR. The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. London: Springer, 146–71.
22.
LeibenluftJ. 2007. A librarian's worst nightmare: Yahoo! Answers, where 120 million users can be wrong. www.slate.com. 2008 Sep. 16.
23.
KangSH, WattJH, AlaSK. 2008. Communicators' perceptions of social presence as a function of avatar realism in small display mobile communication devices. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Washington, DC. IEEE Computer Society, 1–10.
