We conducted a study of the relationships between Internet self-efficacy, sensation seeking, the need for cognition, and problematic use of the Internet. The study was based on a randomly selected sample of 979 adult Internet users. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis of these subjects' responses on a questionnaire consisting of relevant items indicated that Internet self-efficacy and sensation seeking positively predicted problematic Internet use. Contrastingly, the need for cognition was significantly negatively associated with problematic Internet use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). 2009. Statistical report of Internet development of China. http://research.cnnic.cn/img/h000/h11/attach200907161303030.pdf. 2009 Dec. 7.
2.
OzcanNK, BuzluS. Internet use and its relation with the psychosocial situation for a sample of university students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007; 10:767–72.
3.
CeyhanAA. Predictors of problematic Internet use on Turkish university students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:363–6.
4.
NiXL, YanH, ChenSLet al.Factors influencing Internet addiction in a sample of freshmen university students in China. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:327–32.
5.
CeyhanAA, CeyhanE. Loneliness, depression, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:699–701.
6.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychologist, 1977; 37:122–47.
7.
GISTM. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 1987; 12:472–86.
8.
EastinMS, LaRoseR. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2000; 6. www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html. 2009 Dec. 7.
9.
WhittyMT, McLaughlinD. Online recreation: The relationship between loneliness, Internet self-efficacy and the use of the Internet for entertainment purposes. Computers in Human Behavior, 2007; 23:1435–46.
10.
ZuckermanM. 1979. Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
PizamA, JeongG-H, ReichelAet al.The relationship between risk-taking, sensation seeking, and tourist behavior of young adults: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Travel Research, 2004; 42:251–60.
12.
LinSSJ, TsaiCC. Sensation seeking and Internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents. Computers in Human Studies, 2002; 18:411–26.
13.
CacioppoJT, PettyRE. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1982; 42:116–31.
14.
VerplankenB, HazenbergPT, PalenéwenGR. Need for cognition and external information search. Journal of Research in Personality, 1992; 26:128–36.
15.
KaynarO, Amichai-HamburgerY. The effects of cognition on Internet use revisited. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008; 24:361–71.
16.
BrislinRW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1970; 1:185–216.
17.
TorkzadehG, Van DykeTP. Development and validation of an Internet self-efficacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2001; 20:275–80.
18.
HoyleRH, StephensonMT, PalmgreenPet al.Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality & Individual Differences, 2002; 32:401–14.
19.
JiaR, JiaHH. Factorial validity of problematic Internet use scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:1335–42.
20.
KuangY, ShiJQ, CaiYQ. The Chinese version of Need for Cognition Scale. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2005; 19:57–60.
21.
ZuckermanM, BallS, BlackJ. Influences of sensation, gender, risk appraisal, and situational motivation on smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 1990; 15:209–20.
22.
StacyAW, NewcombMD, BentlerPM. Cognitive motivations and sensation seeking as long-term predictors of drinking problems. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 1993; 12:1–24.
23.
NewcombMD, McGeeL. Influence of sensation seeking on general deviance and specific problem behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1991; 61:614–28.
