Social-networking sites (SNSs) provide users with a unique computer-mediated environment where individuals are able to disclose their thoughts, feelings, and experiences within their circle of personal ties. From a positive psychological perspective, this research investigated the use of SNSs and users' subjective well-being. The results show that although the time spent using a SNS is not related to well-being, the amount of self-disclosure on SNSs is positively related to subjective well-being. In addition, an individual's socioeconomic status is negatively related to self-disclosing behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
E-Society: My world Is cyworld. BusinessWeek, Sep.26, 2005.
2.
EllisonNB, SteinfieldC, LampeC. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students' use of online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007; 12:1143–68.
3.
RossC, OrrES, SisicMet al.Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:578–86.
4.
JoinsonAN. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2001; 31:177–92.
5.
TidwellLC, WaltherJB. Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Computers in Human Behavior, 2002; 28:317–48.
6.
BarghJA, McKennaKYA, FitzsimonsGM. Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 2002; 58:33–48.
7.
Amichai-HamburgerY, WainapelG, FoxS. “On the Internet no one knows I'm an introvert”: Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2002; 5:125–8.
8.
ArcherJL. 1980. Self-disclosure. WegnerD, VallacherR. The self in social psychology. London: Oxford University, 183–204.
9.
DienerE, LucasRE, OishiS. 2005. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. SnyderCR, LopezSJ. Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 63–73.
10.
DienerE, SuhEM, LucasREet al.Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 1999; 125:276–302.
11.
EsterlingBA, L'AbateL, MurrayEJet al.Empirical foundations for writing in prevention and psychotherapy: Mental and physical health outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 1999; 19:79–96.
12.
GableSL, ReisHT, ImpettEAet al.What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2004; 87:228–45.
13.
BakerJR, MooreSM. Blogging as a social tool: A psychosocial examination of the effects of blogging. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2008; 11:747–9.
14.
KoH-C, KuoF-Y. Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure?CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12:75–9.
15.
CollmanJS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988; 94:95–120.
16.
ValenzuelaS, ParkN, KeeKF. Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2009; 14:875–901.
17.
JacksonLA, von EyeA, BarbatsisGet al.The impact of Internet use on the other side of the digital divide. Communications of the ACM, 2004; 47:43–7.
18.
HsiehJJP-A, RaiA, KeilM. Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged. MIS Quarterly, 2008; 32:97–126.
19.
EmmonsRA. Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1985; 11:89–97.
20.
AmielT, SargentSL. Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 2004; 20:711–26.
21.
HamburgerYA, Ben-ArtziE. The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000; 16:441–9.
22.
WatsonD, ClarkLA, TellegenA. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1988; 54:1063–70.
23.
DienerE, EmmonsRA, LarsenRJet al.The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985; 49:71–5.
24.
SheldonKM, LyubomirskyS.Achieving sustainable gains in happiness: Change your actions, not your circumstances. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2006; 7:55–86.
25.
GibbsJL, EllisonNB, HeinoRD. Self-presentation in online personals the role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 2006; 33:152–77.
26.
CongerRD, CongerKJ, GlenHet al.A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development, 1992; 63:526–41.
27.
LeeK. The effects of personality on relationship satisfaction and commitment among couples. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 2004; 9:131–50.
28.
GoldbergLR, JohnsonJA, EberHWet al.The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 2006; 40:84–96.
29.
BuchananT, JohnsonJA, GoldbergLR. Implementing a five-factor personality inventory for use on the Internet. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2005; 21:115–27.
30.
BoydDM, EllisonNB. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007; 13:210–30.
31.
JungT, YounH, McClungS. Motivations and self-presentation strategies on Korean-based “Cyworld” weblog format personal homepages. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2007; 10:24–31.
32.
NettleD. An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum. Evolution & Human Behavior, 2005; 26:363–73.
33.
LeeRM, DeanaBL, JungaK-R. Social connectedness, extraversion, and subjective well-being: Testing a mediation model. Personality & Individual Differences, 2008; 45:414–19.
34.
ShimM, LeeMJ, ParkSH. Photograph use on social network sites among South Korean college students: The role of public and private self-consciousness. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2008; 11:489–93.
35.
GoffmanE. 1958. The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
