This study examined how cell-phone use is related to interpersonal motives for using cell phones, face-to-face communication, and loneliness. A survey of 232 college students who owned a cell phone revealed that affection and inclusion were relatively strong motivations for using voice calls and text messaging, and that interpersonal motives were positively related to the amount of cell-phone use, including calling and texting. The amount of face-to-face interaction was positively associated with the participants' cell-phone use and their interpersonal motives for using cell phones: the more the participants engaged in face-to-face interaction with other people, the higher their motives were and the more frequent cell-phone use was. Loneliness did not have a direct relation to cell-phone use. Instead, the participants with higher levels of loneliness were less likely to engage in face-to-face social interaction, which led them to use cell phones less and to be less motivated to use cell phones for interpersonal purposes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education. 2008. Profile of today's college student. http://www.naspa.org/2008%20technology%20use.pdf. 2009 Sep. 30.
2.
RamirezAJr, DimmickJ, FeasterJet al.Revisiting interpersonal media competition: The gratification niches of instant messaging, e-mail, and the telephone. Communication Research, 2008; 35:529–47.
3.
MaslowAH. 1968. Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.
4.
SchutzWC. 1966. The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
5.
BaumeisterRF, LearyMR. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1995; 117:497–529.
6.
LicoppeC. “Connected” presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 2004; 22:135–56.
7.
KatzJE, AakhusM. 2002. Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
LeungL, WeiR. More than just talk on the move: Uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2000; 77:308–20.
9.
WeiR, LoV-H. Staying connected while on the move: Mobile phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society, 2006; 8:53–72.
10.
IshiiK. Implications of mobility: The uses of personal communication media in everyday life. Journal of Communication, 2006; 56:346–65.
11.
SloanWW, SolanoCH. The conversational styles of lonely males with strangers and roommates. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1984; 10:293–301.
12.
SolanoCH, BattenPG, ParishEA. Loneliness and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1982; 43:524–31.
13.
DavisRA, FlettGL, BesserA. Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2002; 5:331–45.
14.
RubinAM, PerseEM, PowellRA. Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 1985; 12:155–80.
15.
DimmickJW, SikandJ, PattersonSJ. The gratifications of the household telephone: Sociability, instrumentality, and reassurance. Communication Research, 1994; 21:643–64.
16.
O'KeefeGJ, SulanowskiBK. More than just talk: Uses, gratifications, and the telephone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1995; 72:922–33.
17.
SingerBD. 1981. Social functions of the telephone. Palo Alto, CA: R&E Research Associates.
18.
AuterPJ. Portable social groups: Willingness to communicate, interpersonal communication gratifications, and cell phone use among young adults. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 2007; 5:139–56.
19.
RubinAM, PerseEM, BarbatoCA. Conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication motives. Human Communication Research, 1988; 14:602–28.
20.
CampbellSW, RussoTC. The social construction of mobile technology: An application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phones within personal communication networks. Communication Monographs, 2003; 70:317–34.
21.
JinB, PeñaJ. Mobile communication in romantic relationships: Mobile phone use, relational uncertainty, love, commitment, and attachment styles. Communication Reports, 2010in press.
22.
KimH, KimGJ, ParkHWet al.Configurations of relationships in different media: Ftf, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007; 12:1183–207.
23.
CampbellSW, KelleyMJ.Mobile phone use in AA networks: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 2006; 34:191–208.
24.
JinB. 2007. Mobile communication as a mode of interpersonal communication. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention: Chicago.
25.
ReidDJ, ReidFJM. Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007; 10:424–35.
26.
LearyMR. Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1983; 47:66–75.
27.
CacioppoJT, HawkleyLC, BerntsonGG. The anatomy of loneliness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2003; 12:71–4.
28.
JonesW. 1982. Loneliness and social behavior. PeplauLA, PerlmanD. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 283–52.
29.
PeplauLA, RussellD, HeimM. 1979. The experience of loneliness. FriezeI, Bar-TalD, CarrollJS. New approaches to social problems: Applications of attribution theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 53–78.
30.
PerlmanD, PeplauLA. 1981. Toward a social psychology of loneliness. DuckS, GilmourR. Personal relationships 3: Personal relationships in disorder. New York: Academic Press, 31–56.
31.
SpitzbergBH, CanaryDJ. Loneliness and relationally competent communication. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 1985; 2:387–402.
32.
CheekJM, BuschCM. Influence of shyness on loneliness in a new situation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981; 7:573–77.
33.
RussellDW, PeplauLA, CutronaCE. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1980; 39:472–80.
34.
FinnS, GorrMB. Social isolation and social support as correlates of television viewing motivations. Communication Research, 1988; 15:135–58.
35.
RussellDW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1996; 66:20–40.
36.
Morahan-MartinJ, SchumacherP. Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 2003; 19:659–71.
LingR, YttriB. 2002. Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. KatzJE, AakhusM. Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 139–69.
39.
HosmanLA. The relationships among need for privacy, loneliness, conversational sensitivity, and interpersonal communication motives. Communication Reports, 1991; 4:73–80.
