With the diffusion of networked technology, personal relationships can be easily formed and maintained online today. Similar to a face-to-face situation, conflict is also seen in these online relationships. Early theories suggested that computer-mediated communication (CMC) tends to increase conflicts because of the lack of social-context cues, and CMC is not rich enough to manage conflict. As CMC has become part of our daily life, we often face conflict online, and thus we need to understand how people manage conflict online. This study explored how online users manage interpersonal conflict. Self-report survey data from 159 university students were analyzed to examine their conflict-management styles in association with the perceived closeness of the online relationship and a future intention toward the relationship. The results indicated that online users select cooperative management styles to handle conflict in their close relationships. In addition, online users avoid less cooperative styles when they want to continue the relationship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ParksMR, RobertsLD. Making MOOsic: The development of personal relationships online and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 1998; 15:517–537.
2.
ShortJ, WilliamsE, ChristieB. 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
3.
DaftRL, LengelRH. 1984. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. StawBM, CummingsLL. Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 191–233.
4.
DaftRL, LengelRH. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 1986; 32:554–571.
5.
SandersonCA, RahmKB, BeigbederSA. The link between the pursuit of intimacy goals and satisfaction in close same-sex friendships: An examination of the underlying processes. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 2005; 22:75–98.
6.
SandersonCA, KaretskyKH. Intimacy goals and strategies of conflict resolution in dating relationships: A mediational analysis. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 2002; 19:317–337.
7.
GreeffAP, DeBruyneT. Conflict management style and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 2000; 26:321–334.
8.
WaltherJB. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 1992; 19:52–89.
9.
YeJ. Attachment style differences in online relationship involvement: An examination of interaction characteristics and relationship satisfaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007; 10:605–607.
10.
BoaseJ. Personal networks and the personal communication system. Communication & Society, 2008; 11:490–508.
11.
HaythornthwaiteC, WellmanB. Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998; 49:1101–1114.
12.
SternMJ. How locality, frequency of communication and internet usage affect modes of communication within core social networks. Information, Communication & Society, 2008; 11:591–616.
13.
CummingsJN, ButlerB, KrautR. The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 2002; 45:103–108.
14.
RamirezA, ZhangS. When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monograph, 2007; 74:287–310.
15.
DawsonS. A study of the relationship between student communication interaction of sense of community. Internet & Higher Education, 2006; 9:153–162.
16.
HaythornthwaiteC. Online personal networks: size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media & Society, 2000; 2:195–226.
17.
AitkenJE, ShedletskyLJ. Using electronic discussion to teach communication courses. Communication Education, 2002; 51:325–331.
18.
WhittyMT. Liberating or debilitating? An examination of romantic relationships, sexual relationships and friendships on the Net. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008; 24:1837–1850.
19.
BlakeR, MoultonJ. 1964. The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
RahimMA. A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 1983; 26:368–376.
22.
RahimMA, MagnerNR, ShapiroDL. Do justice perceptions influence styles of handling conflict with supervisors?: What justice perceptions, precisely?International Journal of Conflict Management, 2000; 11:9–31.
23.
MaxwellGM. Behavior of lovers: Measuring the closeness of relationships. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 1985; 2:215–238.
24.
BippusAM, RollinE. Attachment style differences in relational maintenance and conflict behaviors: Friend's perceptions. Communication Reports, 2003; 16:113–123.
25.
ThayerSM, UpdegraffKA, DelgadoMY. Conflict resolution in Mexican American Adolescents' friendships: Links with culture, gender and friendship quality. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 2008; 37:783–797.
26.
MackeyRA, DiemerMA, O'BrienBA. Psychological intimacy in the lasting relationships of heterosexual and same-gender couples. Sex Roles, 2000; 43:201–227.
27.
GershonL. Email my heart: Remediation and romantic break-ups. Anthropology Today, 2008; 24:13–15.
28.
WellmanB. Community: From neighborhood to network. Communications of the ACM, 2005; 48:53–55.
29.
WaltherJB. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 1995; 6:186–203.
30.
BakerA. What makes an online relationship successful? Clues from couples who met in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2002; 5:363–375.
31.
AllanG. Flexibility, friendship, and family. Personal Relationships, 2008; 15:1–16.
32.
DavisMH, KrausLA, CapobiancoS. Age differences in responses to conflict in the workplace. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 2009; 68:339–355.
33.
GrossMA, GuerreroLK. Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim's organizational conflict styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2000; 11:200–226.
34.
PapaMJ, CanaryDJ. 1995. Conflict in organizations: A competence-based approach. NicoteraM. Conflict and organizations: Communicative processes. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 53–179.
WaltherJB. Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 1993; 57:381–398.
37.
SteinfieldC, ElsonNB, LampeC. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008; 29:434–445.
38.
WittemanH. Analyzing interpersonal conflict: Nature of awareness, type of initiating event, situational perceptions, and management styles. Western Journal of Communication, 1992; 56:248–280.
39.
PilkingtonCJ, RichardsonDR. Consistency versus context: Situational effects and personal preferences in conflict management. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1999; 23:5–14.
40.
AydinC. Occupational adaptation to computerized medical information systems. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 1989; 30:163–179.
41.
SproullL, KieslerS. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 1986; 32:1492–1512.
