Little is known about cyber harassment in general, and in order to understand more about online harassment among intimate partners, it is important to examine people's perceptions of this new form of aggression. Using Johnson's typology of relationship violence as a guiding framework, the role of technology in partner violence was explored using data from five focus group interviews. Six themes emerged from the analyses, four of which revealed that this partner violence typology accounted for the aggressive use of technology in dating relationships. The remaining themes centered on the ways in which online harassment differs from offline violence. These findings have important theoretical implications and may inform future prevention and intervention efforts.
VandeboschH, Van CleemputK. Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:499–503.
3.
WhittyMT, CarrAN. 2006. Cyberspace romance: the psychology of online relationships. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
4.
BocijP. 2004. Cyberstalking: harassment in the Internet age. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
FinnJ. A survey of online harassment at a university campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2004; 19:468–83.
6.
SouthworthC, FinnJ, DawsonSet al.Intimate partner violence, technology, and stalking. Violence Against Women, 2007; 13:842–56.
7.
BurgessAW, BakerT. 2002. Cyberstalking. BloomJ, SheridanL. Stalking and psychosexual obsession: psychological perspectives for prevention, policing, and treatment. New York: Wiley, 201–19.
8.
FinnJ, BanachM. Victimization online: the downside of seeking human services for women on the internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2000; 3:785–96.
9.
SpitzbergBH, HooblerG. Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 2002; 4:71–92.
10.
AlexyEM, BurgessAW, BakerTet al.Perceptions of cyberstalking among college students. Brief Treatment & Crisis Intervention, 2005; 5:279–89.
11.
HoltTJ, BosslerAM. Examining the applicability of lifestyle-routine activities theory for cybercrime victimization. Deviant Behavior, 2009; 30:1–25.
12.
SheridanLP, GrantT. Is cyberstalking different?Psychology, Crime, & Law, 2007; 13:627–40.
13.
JohnsonMP. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 1995; 57:283–94.
14.
JohnsonMP. Conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 2006; 12:1003–18.
15.
ProsperoM. The role of perceptions in dating violence among young adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2006; 21:470–84.
16.
SearsHA, ByersS, WhelanJJet al.“If it hurts you, then it is not a joke”: adolescents' ideas about girls' and boys' use and experience of abusive behavior in dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2006; 21:1191–1207.
17.
LindlofTR, TaylorBC. 2002. Qualitative communication research methods, 2nd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
JohnsonMP, FerraroKJ. Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: making distinctions. Journal of Marriage & Family, 2000; 62:948–63.
19.
ChenYF, PengSS. University students' Internet use and its relationships with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, psychosocial adjustment, and self-evaluation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008; 11:467–9.
20.
GemmillE, PetersonM. Technology use among college students: implications for student affairs professionals. NASPA: Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education Journal, 2006; 43:280–300.
21.
KowalskiRM, LimberSP. Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2007; 41:S22–S30.
22.
EllisonL. 2001. Cyberstalking: tackling harassment on the Internet. WallDS. Crime and the Internet. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 141–51.
23.
Graham-KevanN, ArcherJ. Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: a test of Johnson's predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2003; 18:1247–70.
24.
HindujaS, PatchinJW. Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 2008; 29:129–56.
