Rhodnius prolixus is currently the model vector of choice for studying Chagas disease transmission, a debilitating disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi parasites. However, transgenesis and gene editing protocols to advance the field are still lacking. Here, we tested protocols for the maternal delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly spaced palindromic repeats/Cas-9 associated) elements to developing R. prolixus oocytes and strategies for the identification of insertions and deletions (indels) in target loci of resulting gene-edited generation zero (G0) nymphs. We demonstrate successful gene editing of the eye color markers Rp-scarlet and Rp-white, and the cuticle color marker Rp-yellow, with highest effectiveness obtained using Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT Control) with the ovary-targeting BtKV ligand. These results provide proof of concepts for generating somatic mutations in R. prolixus and potentially for generating germ line-edited lines in triatomines, laying the foundation for gene editing protocols that could lead to the development of novel control strategies for vectors of Chagas disease.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PereiraPCM, NavarroEC. Challenges and perspectives of Chagas disease: A review. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis, 2013; 19(1):34; doi: 10.1186/1678-9199-19-34
2.
MesquitaRD, Vionette-AmaralRJ, LowenbergerC, et al.Genome of Rhodnius prolixus, an insect vector of Chagas disease, reveals unique adaptations to hematophagy and parasite infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015; 112(48):14936–14941; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506226112
3.
MedeirosMN, LogulloR, RamosIB, et al.Transcriptome and gene expression profile of ovarian follicle tissue of the triatomine bug Rhodnius prolixus. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2011; 41(10):823–831; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.06.004
4.
RibeiroJMC, GentaFA, SorgineMHF, et al.An insight into the transcriptome of the digestive tract of the bloodsucking bug, Rhodnius prolixus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2014; 8(1):e2594; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002594
5.
Latorre-EstivalisJM, RobertsonHM, WaldenKKO, et al.The molecular sensory machinery of a Chagas disease vector: Expression changes through imaginal moult and sexually dimorphic features. Sci Rep, 2017; 7:40049; doi: 10.1038/srep40049
6.
PascualA, Rivera-PomarR. Dynamics of maternal gene expression in Rhodnius prolixus. Sci Rep, 2022; 12(1):6538; doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09874-7
7.
Walter-NunoAB, OliveiraMP, OliveiraMF, et al.Silencing of maternal heme-binding protein causes embryonic mitochondrial dysfunction and impairs embryogenesis in the blood sucking insect Rhodnius prolixus. J Biol Chem, 2013; 288(41):29323–29332; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.504985
8.
Souza-FerreiraPS, MansurJF, BerniM, et al.Chitin deposition on the embryonic cuticle of Rhodnius prolixus: The reduction of CHS transcripts by CHS-dsRNA injection in females affects chitin deposition and eclosion of the first instar nymph. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2014; 51:101–109; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.12.004
9.
LavoreA, PascualA, SalinasFM, et al.Comparative analysis of zygotic developmental genes in Rhodnius prolixus genome shows conserved features on the tracheal developmental pathway. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2015; 64:32–43; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.06.012
10.
AndersC, NiewoehnerO, DuerstA, et al.Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature, 2014; 513(7519):569–573; doi: 10.1038/nature13579
11.
BarrangouR, DoudnaJA. Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond. Nat Biotechnol, 2016; 34(9):933–941; doi: 10.1038/nbt.3659
12.
GarciaES, RatcliffeNA, WhittenMM, et al.Exploring the role of insect host factors in the dynamics of Trypanosoma cruzi-Rhodnius prolixus interactions. J Insect Physiol, 2007; 53(1):11–21; doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.10.006
13.
KellyGM, HuebnerE. Embryonic development of the hemipteran insect Rhodnius prolixus. J Morphol, 1989; 199(2):175–196; doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051990205
14.
Chaverra-RodriguezD, MaciasVM, HughesGL, et al.Targeted delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein into arthropod ovaries for heritable germline gene editing. Nat Commun, 2018; 9(1):3008; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05425-9
15.
MaciasVM, McKeandS, Chaverra-RodriguezD, et al.Cas9-mediated gene-editing in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi by ReMOT control. G3 (Bethesda), 2020; 10(4):1353–1360; doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401133
16.
HeuCC, McCulloughFM, LuanJ, et al.CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing in the silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). CRISPR J, 2020; 3(2):89–96; doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0067
17.
ShiraiY, PiulachsM-D, BellesX, et al.DIPA-CRISPR is a simple and accessible method for insect gene editing. Cell Rep Methods, 2022; 2(5):100215; doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100215
18.
SharmaA, PhamMN, ReyesJB, et al.Cas9-mediated gene editing in the black-legged tick, Ixodes scapularis, by embryo injection and ReMOT Control. iScience, 2022; 25(3):103781; doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103781
19.
BerniM, LimaL, BressanD, et al.Atypical strategies for cuticle pigmentation in the blood-feeding hemipteran Rhodnius prolixus. Genetics, 2022; 221(2):iyac064; doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac064
20.
LabunK, MontagueTG, KrauseM, et al.CHOPCHOP v3: Expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47(W1):W171–W174; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz365
21.
Martin-MartinI, AryanA, MenesesC, et al.Optimization of sand fly embryo microinjection for gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2018; 12(9):e0006769; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006769
22.
GloorGB, PrestonCR, Johnson-SchlitzDM, et al.Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics, 1993; 135(1):81–95; doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.81
23.
Chaverra-RodriguezD, Dalla BenettaE, HeuCC, et al.Germline mutagenesis of Nasonia vitripennis through ovarian delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein. Insect Mol Biol, 2020; 29(6):569–577; doi: 10.1111/imb.12663
24.
TerradasG, BennettJB, LiZ, et al.Genetic conversion of a split-drive into a full-drive element. Nat Commun, 2023; 14(1):191; doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35044-4
25.
MorganTH. Sex limited inheritance in Drosophila. Science, 1910; 32(812):120–122; doi: 10.1126/science.32.812.120
26.
CarbonareBD, GehringWJ. Excision of copia element in a revertant of the white-apricot mutation of Drosophila melanogaster leaves behind one long-terminal repeat. Mol Gen Genet, 1985; 199(1):1–6; doi: 10.1007/BF00327501
27.
HanQ, CalvoE, MarinottiO, et al.Analysis of the wild-type and mutant genes encoding the enzyme kynurenine monooxygenase of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol, 2003; 12(5):483–490; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00433.x
28.
Ewen-CampenB, PerrimonN. ovoD Co-selection: A method for enriching CRISPR/Cas9-edited alleles in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda), 2018; 8(8):2749–2756; doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200498
29.
GuichardA, HaqueT, BobikM, et al.Efficient allelic-drive in Drosophila. Nat Commun, 2019; 10(1):1640; doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09694-w.
30.
KimH, IshidateT, GhantaKS, et al.A co-CRISPR strategy for efficient genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 2014; 197(4):1069–1080; doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.166389.
31.
KaneNS, VoraM, VarreKJ, et al.Efficient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-induced events in Drosophila using a co-CRISPR strategy. G3 (Bethesda), 2017; 7(1):87–93; doi: 10.1534/g3.116.036723
32.
RedingK, PickL. High-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis of the white gene in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. Genetics, 2020; 215(4):1027–1037; doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303269
33.
LiX, XuY, ZhangH, et al.ReMOT control delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex to induce germline mutagenesis in the disease vector mosquitoes Culex pipiens pallens (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol, 2021; 58(3):1202–1209; doi: 10.1093/jme/tjab016
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
