The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 system has been widely used to create animal models for biomedical and agricultural use owing to its low cost and easy handling. However, the occurrence of erroneous cleavage (off-targeting) may raise certain concerns for the practical application of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. In this study, we created a melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R)-edited pig model through somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) by using porcine kidney cells modified by the CRISPR-Cas9 system. We then carried out whole-genome sequencing of two MC1R-edited pigs and two cloned wild-type siblings, together with the donor cells, to assess the genome-wide presence of single-nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions (indels) and found only one candidate off-target indel in both MC1R-edited pigs. In summary, our study indicates that the minimal off-targeting effect induced by CRISPR-Cas9 may not be a major concern in gene-edited pigs created by SCNT.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BhayaD, DavisonM, BarrangouR. CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: Versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annu Rev Genet, 2011; 45:273–297; doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132430
2.
LoureiroA, da SilvaGJ. CRISPR-Cas: Converting a bacterial defence mechanism into a state-of-the-art genetic manipulation tool. Antibiotics (Basel), 2019; 8(1):18; doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8010018
3.
WiedenheftB, SternbergSH, DoudnaJA. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature, 2012; 482(7385):331–338; doi: 10.1038/nature10886
4.
MaY, ZhangL, HuangX. Genome modification by CRISPR/Cas9. FEBS J, 2014; 281(23):5186–5193; doi: 10.1111/febs.13110
5.
AgarwalN, GuptaR. History, evolution and classification of CRISPR-Cas associated systems. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci, 2021; 179:11–76; doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.12.012
6.
MakarovaKS, HaftDH, BarrangouR, et al.Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2011; 9(6):467–477; doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2577
7.
MakarovaKS, AravindL, WolfYI, et al.Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct, 2011; 6:38; doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-6-38
8.
ChylinskiK, MakarovaKS, CharpentierE, et al.Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014; 42(10):6091–6105; doi: 10.1093/nar/gku241
9.
ZhangY, GeX, YangF, et al.Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells. Sci Rep, 2014; 4:5405; doi: 10.1038/srep05405
10.
RanFA, HsuPD, LinCY, et al.Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell, 2013; 154(6):1380–1389; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021
11.
HsuPD, ScottDA, WeinsteinJA, et al.DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol, 2013; 31(9):827–832; doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647
12.
TasanI, ZhaoH. Targeting specificity of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. ACS Synth Biol, 2017; 6(9):1609–1613; doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00270
13.
ZhangXH, TeeLY, WangXG, et al.Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2015; 4:e264; doi: 10.1038/mtna.2015.37
14.
WangYF, WangB, XieHH, et al.Efficient human genome editing using SaCas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Biotechnol J, 2019; 14(7):e1800689; doi: ARTN 1800689 10.1002/biot.201800689
15.
SchaeferKA, WuWH, ColganDF, et al.Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo. Nat Methods, 2017; 14(6):547–548; doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4293
16.
WangX, LiuJ, NiuY, et al.Low incidence of SNVs and indels in trio genomes of Cas9-mediated multiplex edited sheep. BMC Genomics, 2018; 19(1):397; doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4712-z
17.
MidicU, HungPH, VincentKA, et al.Quantitative assessment of timing, efficiency, specificity and genetic mosaicism of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing of hemoglobin beta gene in rhesus monkey embryos. Hum Mol Genet, 2017; 26(14):2678–2689; doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx154
18.
IyerV, BoroviakK, ThomasM, et al.No unexpected CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity revealed by trio sequencing of gene-edited mice. PLoS Genet, 2018; 14(7):e1007503; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007503
19.
GurelF, WuY, PanC, et al.On- and off-target analyses of CRISPR-Cas12b genome editing systems in rice. CRISPR J, 2023; 6(1):62–74; doi: 10.1089/crispr.2022.0072
20.
MartinF, Sánchez-HernándezS, Gutiérrez-GuerreroA, et al.Biased and unbiased methods for the detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9: An overview. Int J Mol Sci, 2016; 17(9):1507; doi: 10.3390/ijms17091507
21.
KaeuferleT, StiefTA, CanzarS, et al.Genome-wide off-target analyses of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated T-cell receptor engineering in primary human T cells. Clin Transl Immunology, 2022; 11(1):e1372; doi: 10.1002/cti2.1372
22.
LiJ, ManghwarH, SunL, et al.Whole genome sequencing reveals rare off-target mutations and considerable inherent genetic or/and somaclonal variations in CRISPR/Cas9-edited cotton plants. Plant Biotechnol J, 2019; 17(5):858–868; doi: 10.1111/pbi.13020
23.
TangX, LiuG, ZhouJ, et al.A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals highly specific genome editing by both Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) nucleases in rice. Genome Biol, 2018; 19(1):84; doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1458-5
24.
WilmA, AwPP, BertrandD, et al.LoFreq: A sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012; 40(22):11189–11201; doi: 10.1093/nar/gks918
25.
CibulskisK, LawrenceMS, CarterSL, et al.Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol, 2013; 31(3):213–219; doi: 10.1038/nbt.2514
26.
KimS, SchefflerK, HalpernAL, et al.Strelka2: Fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants. Nat Methods, 2018; 15(8):591–594; doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0051-x
27.
XuC. A review of somatic single nucleotide variant calling algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 2018; 16:15–24; doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.01.003
28.
AliotoTS, BuchhalterI, DerdakS, et al.A comprehensive assessment of somatic mutation detection in cancer using whole-genome sequencing. Nat Commun, 2015; 6:10001; doi: 10.1038/ncomms10001
29.
SandmannS, de GraafAO, KarimiM, et al.Evaluating variant calling tools for non-matched next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep, 2017; 7:43169; doi: 10.1038/srep43169
30.
CaiL, YuanW, ZhangZ, et al.In-depth comparison of somatic point mutation callers based on different tumor next-generation sequencing depth data. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:36540; doi: 10.1038/srep36540
31.
JinS, GaoQ, GaoC. An unbiased method for evaluating the genome-wide specificity of base editors in rice. Nat Protoc, 2021; 16(1):431–457; doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00423-y
32.
UraH, TogiS, NiidaY. Dual deep sequencing improves the accuracy of low-frequency somatic mutation detection in cancer gene panel testing. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(10):3530; doi: 10.3390/ijms21103530
33.
LightnerJK. Genetics of Coat Color I The Melanocortin 1 Receptor (MC1R). Answers Res J, 2008; 2008:109–116.
34.
NewtonRA, RobertsDW, LeonardJH, et al.Human melanocytes expressing MC1R variant alleles show impaired activation of multiple signaling pathways. Peptides, 2007; 28(12):2387–2396; doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.10.003
35.
JiQ, ZhuK, LiuZ, et al.Improvement of porcine cloning efficiency by trichostain A through early-stage induction of embryo apoptosis. Theriogenology, 2013; 79(5):815–823; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.12.010
36.
LiH, DurbinR. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 2009; 25(14):1754–1760; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
37.
LiH, HandsakerB, WysokerA, et al.The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 2009; 25(16):2078–2079; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
38.
CingolaniP, PlattsA, Wang leL, et al.A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin), 2012; 6(2):80–92; doi: 10.4161/fly.19695
39.
OggSL, WeldonAK, DobbieL, et al.Expression of butyrophilin (Btn1a1) in lactating mammary gland is essential for the regulated secretion of milk-lipid droplets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004; 101(27):10084–10089; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402930101
40.
WangF, HerzigC, OzerD, et al.Tyrosine phosphorylation of scavenger receptor cysteine-rich WC1 is required for the WC1-mediated potentiation of TCR-induced T-cell proliferation. Eur J Immunol, 2009; 39(1):254–266; doi: 10.1002/eji.200838472
41.
LiuZ, SongF, MaZL, et al.Bivalent copper ions promote fibrillar aggregation of KCTD1 and induce cytotoxicity. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:32658; doi: 10.1038/srep32658
42.
DengY, DiepstratenST, PottsMA, et al.Generation of a CRISPR activation mouse that enables modelling of aggressive lymphoma and interrogation of venetoclax resistance. Nat Commun, 2022; 13(1):4739; doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32485-9
43.
ZhangY, WangY, YulinB, et al.CRISPR/Cas9-mediated sheep MSTN gene knockout and promote sSMSCs differentiation. J Cell Biochem, 2019; 120(2):1794–1806; doi: 10.1002/jcb.27474
44.
DuanJ, LuG, XieZ, et al.Genome-wide identification of CRISPR/Cas9 off-targets in human genome. Cell Res, 2014; 24(8):1009–1012; doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.87
45.
AdikusumaF, PiltzS, CorbettMA, et al.Large deletions induced by Cas9 cleavage. Nature, 2018; 560(7717):E8–E9; doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0380-z
46.
ZuccaroMV, XuJ, MitchellC, et al.Allele-specific chromosome removal after Cas9 cleavage in human embryos. Cell, 2020; 183(6):1650–1664.e15; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.025
47.
WuH, ZhouW, LiuH, et al.Whole-genome methylation analysis reveals epigenetic variation between wild-type and nontransgenic cloned, ASMT transgenic cloned dairy goats generated by the somatic cell nuclear transfer. J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 2022; 13(1):145; doi: 10.1186/s40104-022-00764-6
48.
LiuZ, CaiY, WangY, et al.Cloning of Macaque monkeys by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell, 2018; 172(4):881–887.e7; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.020
49.
MatobaS, ZhangY. Somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming: Mechanisms and applications. Cell Stem Cell, 2018; 23(4):471–485; doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.06.018
50.
KimDE, LeeJH, JiKB, et al.Generation of genome-edited dogs by somatic cell nuclear transfer. BMC Biotechnol, 2022; 22(1):19; doi: 10.1186/s12896-022-00749-3
51.
SmithC, GoreA, YanW, et al.Whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals high specificity of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN-based genome editing in human iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell, 2014; 15(1):12–13; doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.06.011
52.
VeresA, GosisBS, DingQ, et al.Low incidence of off-target mutations in individual CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN targeted human stem cell clones detected by whole-genome sequencing. Cell Stem Cell, 2014; 15(1):27–30; doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.04.020
53.
AndersC, NiewoehnerO, DuerstA, et al.Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature, 2014; 513(7519):569–573; doi: 10.1038/nature13579
54.
HarringtonLB, DoxzenKW, MaE, et al.A broad-spectrum inhibitor of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell, 2017; 170(6):1224–1233.e15; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.037
55.
NishimasuH, CongL, YanWX, et al.Crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Cell, 2015; 162(5):1113–1126; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.007
56.
NishimasuH, ShiX, IshiguroS, et al.Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space. Science, 2018; 361(6408):1259–1262; doi: 10.1126/science.aas9129
57.
WangX, TuM, WangY, et al.Whole-genome sequencing reveals rare off-target mutations in CRISPR/Cas9-edited grapevine. Hortic Res, 2021; 8(1):114; doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00549-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
