“RNA-templated/directed DNA repair” is a biological mechanism that has been experimentally demonstrated in bacteria, yeast, and mammalian cells. Recent study has shown that small noncoding RNAs (DDRNAs) and/or newly RNAPII transcribed RNAs (dilncRNAs) are orchestrating the initial steps of double-strand break (DSB) repair. In this study, we demonstrate that also pre-mRNA could be used as direct or indirect substrate for DSB repair. Our test system is based on (1) a stably integrated mutant reporter gene that produces constitutively a nonspliceable pre-mRNA, (2) a transiently expressed sgRNA-guided dCas13b::ADAR fusion protein to specifically RNA edit the nonspliceable pre-mRNA, and (3) transiently expressed I-SceI to create a DSB situation to study the effect of spliceable pre-mRNA on DNA repair. Based on our data, the RNA-edited pre-mRNA was used in cis for the DSB repair process, thereby converting the genomically encoded mutant reporter gene into an active reporter gene. Overexpression and knockdown of several cellular proteins were performed to delineate their role in this novel “RNA-mediated end joining” pathway.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiernauxC, LoosM, SelsA, et al.Detection of major bcr-abl gene expression at a very low level in blood cells of some healthy individuals. Blood, 1995; 86:3118–3122.
2.
BoseS, DeiningerM, Gora-TyborJ, et al.The presence of typical and atypical BCR-ABL fusion genes in leukocytes of normal individuals: biologic significance and implications for the assessment of minimal residual disease. Blood, 1998; 92:3362–3367.
3.
UckunFM, Herman-HattenK, CrottyML, et al.Clinical significance of MLL-AF4 fusion transcript expression in the absence of a cytogenetically detectable t(4;11)(q21;q23) chromosomal translocation. Blood, 1998; 92:810–821.
4.
MarcucciG, StroutMP, BloomfieldCD, et al.Detection of unique ALL1 (MLL) fusion transcripts in normal human bone marrow and blood: distinct origin of normal versus leukemic ALL1 fusion transcripts. Cancer Res, 1998; 58:790–793.
5.
CaldasC, SoCW, MacGregorA, et al.Exon scrambling of MLL transcripts occur commonly and mimic partial genomic duplication of the gene. Gene, 1998; 208:167–176; doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00640-9.
6.
Eguchi-IshimaeM, EguchiM, IshiiE, et al.Breakage and fusion of the TEL (ETV6) gene in immature B lymphocytes induced by apoptogenic signals. Blood, 2001; 97:737–743; doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.3.737
7.
QuinaAS, GameiroP, Sá da CostaM, et al.PML-RARA fusion transcripts in irradiated and normal hematopoietic cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 2000; 29:266–275; doi: 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::aid-gcc1030>3.0.co;2-#
8.
MaesB, VanhentenrijkV, WlodarskaI, et al.The NPM-ALK and the ATIC-ALK fusion genes can be detected in non-neoplastic cells. Am J Pathol, 2001; 158:2185–2193; doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64690-1
9.
Beylot-BarryM, GroppiA, VergierB, et al.Characterization of t(2;5) reciprocal transcripts and genomic breakpoints in CD30+ cutaneous lymphoproliferations. Blood, 1998; 91:4668–4676.
10.
LiH, WangJ, MorG, et al.A neoplastic gene fusion mimics trans-splicing of RNAs in normal human cells. Science, 2008; 321:1357–1361; doi: 10.1126/science.1156725
11.
LiH, WangJ, MaX, et al.Gene fusions and RNA trans-splicing in normal and neoplastic human cells. Cell Cycle, 2009; 8:218–222; doi: 10.4161/cc.8.2.7358
12.
RickmanDS, PfluegerD, MossB, et al.SLC45A3-ELK4 is a novel and frequent erythroblast transformation-specific fusion transcript in prostate cancer. Cancer Res, 2009; 69:2734–2738; doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4926
13.
KowarzE, MerkensJ, KarasM, et al.Premature transcript termination, trans-splicing and DNA repair: A vicious path to cancer. Am J Blood Res, 2011; 1:1–12.
14.
KowarzE, DingermannT, MarschalekR. Do non-genomically encoded fusion transcripts cause recurrent chromosomal translocations?. Cancers (Basel), 2012; 4:1036–1049; doi: 10.3390/cancers4041036
15.
LianoglouS, GargV, YangJL, et al.Ubiquitously transcribed genes use alternative polyadenylation to achieve tissue-specific expression. Genes Dev, 2013; 27:2380–2396; doi: 10.1101/gad.229328.113
16.
Kamieniarz-GdulaK, ProudfootNJ. Transcriptional control by premature termination: A forgotten mechanism. Trends Genet, 2019; 35:553–564; doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.05.005
17.
FranciaS, MicheliniF, SaxenaA, et al.Site-specific DICER and DROSHA RNA products control the DNA-damage response. Nature, 2012; 488:231–235; doi: 10.1038/nature11179
18.
WeiW, BaZ, GaoM, et al.A role for small RNAs in DNA double-strand break repair. Cell, 2012; 149:101–112; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.002
19.
MicheliniF, PitchiayaS, VitelliV, et al.Damage-induced lncRNAs control the DNA damage response through interaction with DDRNAs at individual double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol, 2017; 19:1400–1411; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.002
20.
DerrLK, StrathernJN. A role for reverse transcripts in gene conversion. Nature, 1993; 361:170–173; doi: 10.1038/361170a0
21.
KeskinH, ShenY, HuangF, et al.Transcript-RNA-templated DNA recombination and repair. Nature, 2014; 515:436–439; doi: 10.1038/nature13682
22.
OhleC, TesoreroR, SchermannG, et al.Transient rna-dna hybrids are required for efficient double-strand break repair. Cell, 2016; 167:1001–1013; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.001
23.
StoriciF, BebenekK, KunkelTA, et al.Rna-templated DNA repair. Nature, 2007; 447(7142):338–341; doi: 10.1038/nature05720
24.
ChandramoulyG, ZhaoJ, McDevittS, et al.Pol θ reverse transcribes RNA and promotes RNA-templated dna repair. Sci Adv, 2021; 7:eabf1771; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1771
25.
ShenY, NandiP, TaylorMB, et al.Rna-driven genetic changes in bacteria and in human cells. Mut Res, 2011; 717:91–98; doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.03.016
CoxDBT, GootenbergJS, AbudayyehOO, et al.RNA editing with CRISPR-Cas13. Science, 2017; 358:1019–1027; doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0180
28.
PlessisA, PerrinA, HaberJE, et al.Site-specific recombination determined by I-SceI, a mitochondrial group I intron-encoded endonuclease expressed in the yeast nucleus. Genetics, 1992; 130:451–460; doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.3.451
29.
ChanSH, YuAM, McVeyM. Dual roles for DNA polymerase θ in alternative end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Drosophila. PLoS Genet, 2010; 6:e1001005; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001005
30.
YuAM, McVeyM. Synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining accounts for multiple types of repair junctions. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010; 38:5706–5717; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq379
31.
SharmaS, AnandR, ZhangX, et al.MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex is sufficient to promote transcription by RNA polymerase II at double-strand breaks by melting DNA ends. Cell Rep, 2021; 34:108565; doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108565
32.
SchrempfA, SlyskovaJ, LoizouJI. Targeting the DNA repair enzyme polymerase θ in cancer therapy. Trends Cancer, 2021; 7:98–111; doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.09.007
33.
BelotserkovskiiBP, TornalettiS, D'SouzaAD, et al.R-loop generation during transcription: Formation, processing and cellular outcomes. DNA Repair (Amst), 2018; 71:69–81; doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.009
34.
FeretzakiM, PospisilovaM, Valador FernandesR, et al.RAD51-dependent recruitment of TERRA lncRNA to telomeres through R-loops. Nature, 2020; 587:303–308; doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2815-6
35.
Cano-LinaresMI, Yáñez-VilchesA, García-RodríguezN, et al.Non-recombinogenic roles for Rad52 in translesion synthesis during DNA damage tolerance. EMBO Rep, 2021; 22:e50410; doi: 10.15252/embr.202050410
36.
MazinaOM, KeskinH, HanamshetK, et al.Rad52 inverse strand exchange drives RNA-templated DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell, 2017; 67:19–29; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019
37.
ENCODE ProjectConsortium, BirneyE, StamatoyannopoulosJA, et al.Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature, 2007; 447:799–816; doi: 10.1038/nature05874
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
