The introduction of small unmarked edits to the genome of insects is essential to study the molecular underpinnings of important biological traits, such as resistance to insecticides and genetic control strategies. Advances in CRISPR genome engineering have made this possible, but prohibitively laborious for most laboratories due to low rates of editing and the lack of a selectable marker. To facilitate the generation and isolation of precise marker-less edits we have developed a two-step method based on CRISPR-mediated cassette exchange (CriMCE) of a marked placeholder for a variant of interest. This strategy can be used to introduce a wider range of potential edits compared with previous approaches while consolidating the workflow. We present proof-of-principle that CriMCE is a powerful tool by engineering three single nucleotide polymorphism variants into the genome of Anopheles gambiae, with 5–41 × higher rates of editing than homology-directed repair or prime editing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WangZ, MoultJ. SNPs, protein structure, and disease. Hum Mutat, 2001; 17(4):263–270; doi: 10.1002/humu.22.
2.
MishraR, JoshiRK, ZhaoK. Base editing in crops: Current advances, limitations and future implications. Plant Biotechnol J, 2020; 18(1):20–31; doi: 10.1111/pbi.13225.
3.
HemingwayJ, RansonH. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol, 2000; 45:371–391; doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.371.
4.
SamantsidisGR, PanteleriR, DeneckeS, et al.‘What i cannot create, i do not understand’: Functionally validated synergism of metabolic and target site insecticide resistance. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 2020; 287(1927); doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0838.
5.
HsuPD, LanderES, ZhangF. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 2014; 157(6):1262–1278; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010.
6.
PetriK, ZhangW, MaJ, et al.CRISPR prime editing with ribonucleoprotein complexes in zebrafish and primary human cells. Nat Biotechnol, 2021; 1–5; doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00901-y.
7.
LinQ, JinS, ZongY, et al.High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired PegRNAs in plants. Nat Biotechnol, 2021; 39(8):923–927; doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00868-w.
8.
VilligerL, Grisch-ChanHM, LindsayH, et al.Treatment of a metabolic liver disease by in vivo genome base editing in adult mice. Nat Med, 2018; 24(10):1519–1525; doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0209-1.
9.
GaoP, LyuQ, GhanamAR, et al.Prime editing in mice reveals the essentiality of a single base in driving tissue-specific gene expression. Genome Biol, 2021; 22(1):1–21; doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02304-3.
10.
LiC, ZongY, WangY, et al.Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion. Genome Biol, 2018; 19(1):1–9; doi: 10.1186/S13059-018-1443-z.
11.
AnzaloneA v, KoblanLW, LiuDR. Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38(7):824–844; doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9.
12.
BoschJA, BirchakG, PerrimonN. Precise genome engineering in Drosophila using prime editing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020; 118(1); doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021996118.
13.
MarrE, PotterCJ. Base editing of somatic cells using CRISPR-Cas9 in Drosophila. CRISPR J, 2021; 4(6):836–845; doi: 10.1089/crispr.2021.0062.
14.
GrigorakiL, CowlishawR, NolanT, et al.CRISPR/Cas9 modified An. gambiae carrying Kdr mutation L1014F functionally validate its contribution in insecticide resistance and combined effect with metabolic enzymes. PLoS Genet, 2021; 17(7):e1009556; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009556.
15.
KistlerKE, VosshallLB, MatthewsBJ. Genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Cell Rep, 2015; 11(1):51–60; doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.009.
16.
KyrouK, HammondAM, GaliziR, et al.A CRISPR–Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36(11):1062–1066; doi: 10.1038/nbt.4245.
17.
MorianouI, HammondAM, CrisantiA, et al. Natural and artificially-selected alleles provide different levels of resistance to gene drive. In press. London; 2022.
18.
HammondA, PollegioniP, PersampieriT, et al.Gene-drive suppression of mosquito populations in large cages as a bridge between lab and field. Nat Commun, 2021; 12(1):1–9; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24790-6.
19.
Carballar-LejarazúR, OgaugwuC, TusharT, et al.Next-generation gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020; 117(37):22805–22814; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010214117.
20.
AdolfiA, GantzVM, JasinskieneN, et al.Efficient population modification gene-drive rescue system in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):1–13; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19426-0.
21.
HammondAM, KyrouK, BruttiniM, et al.The creation and selection of mutations resistant to a gene drive over multiple generations in the malaria mosquito. PLoS Genet, 2017; 13(10):e1007039; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007039.
22.
CarramiEM, EckermannKN, AhmedHMM, et al.Consequences of resistance evolution in a Cas9-based sex conversion-suppression gene drive for insect pest management. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018; 115(24):6189–6194; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713825115.
23.
GantzVM, JasinskieneN, TatarenkovaO, et al.Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015; 112(49):E6736–E6743; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521077112.
MaroisE, ScaliC, SoichotJ, et al.High-throughput sorting of mosquito larvae for laboratory studies and for future vector control interventions. Malaria J, 2012; 11:302; doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-302.
26.
Tianfang GeD, TippingC, BrodskyMH, et al.Rapid screening for CRISPR-directed editing of Th Drosophila genome using white coconversion. G3, 2016; 6(10):3197–3206; doi: 10.1534/G3.116.032557.
27.
HammondA, KarlssonX, MorianouI, et al.Regulating the expression of gene drives is key to increasing their invasive potential and the mitigation of resistance. PLOS Genet, 2021; 17(1):e1009321; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009321.
28.
HammondA, GaliziR, KyrouK, et al.A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. Nat Biotechnol, 2016; 34(1):78–83; doi: 10.1038/nbt.3439.
29.
GratzSJ, UkkenFP, RubinsteinCD, et al.Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in drosophila. Genetics, 2014; 196(4):961–971; doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.160713.
30.
AngJX de, NevardK, IrelandR, et al.Considerations for homology-based DNA repair in mosquitoes: Impact of sequence heterology and donor template source. PLOS Genet, 2022; 18(2):e1010060; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010060.
31.
LeviT, SloutskinA, KalifaR, et al.Efficient in vivo introduction of point mutations using SsODN and a Co-CRISPR approach. Biol Proced Online, 2020; 22(1):1–12; doi: 10.1186/S12575-020-00123-7.
32.
KaduskarB, KushwahRBS, AuradkarA, et al.Reversing insecticide resistance with allelic-drive in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun, 2022; 13(1):1–8; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27654-1.
33.
ClarksonCS, MilesA, HardingNJ, et al.The genetic architecture of target-site resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in the African malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles coluzzii. Mol Ecol, 2021; 30(21):5303–5317; doi: 10.1111/mec.15845.
34.
VellaMR, GunningCE, LloydAL, et al.Evaluating strategies for reversing CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):1–8; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10633-2.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
