NishidaK, ArazoeT, YachieN, et al.Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science, 2016; 353:8729–8728. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8729.
2.
KomorAC, KimYB, PackerMS, et al.Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature, 2016; 61:5985–5991. DOI: 10.1038/nature17946.
3.
GaudelliNM, KomorAC, ReesHA, et al.Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature, 2017; 551:464–471. DOI: 10.1038/nature24644.
4.
KoblanLW, ArbabM, ShenMW, et al. Efficient C•G-to-G•C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning. Nature Biotechnol 2021 Jun 28 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00938-..
5.
KomorAC, ZhaoKT, PackerMS, et al.Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity. Sci Adv, 2017; 3: eaao4774. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao4774.
6.
ZhaoD, LiJ, LiS, et al.Glycosylase base editors enable C-to-A and C-to-G base changes. Nat Biotechnol, 2021; 39:35–40. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0592-2.
7.
ChenL, ParkJE, PaaP, et al.Programmable C:G to G:C genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9-directed base excision repair proteins. Nat Commun, 2021; 12:1384. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21559-9.
8.
KurtIC, ZhouR, IyerS, et al.CRISPR C-to-G base editors for inducing targeted DNA transversions in human cells. Nat Biotechnol, 2021; 39:41–46. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0609-x.
9.
ArbabM, ShenMW, MokB, et al.Determinants of base editing outcomes from target library analysis and machine learning. Cell, 2020; 182:463–480.e30. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.037.
10.
TuJ, ChenR, YangY, et al.Suicide inactivation of the uracil DNA glycosylase UdgX by covalent complex formation. Nat Chem Biol, 2019; 15:615–622. DOI: 10.1038/s41589-019-0290-x.
11.
AhnW-C, AroliS, KimJ-H, et al.Covalent binding of uracil DNA glycosylase UdgX to abasic DNA upon uracil excision. Nat Chem Biol, 2019; 15, 607–614. DOI: 10.1038/s41589-019-0289-3.
12.
KleinstiverBP, PattanayakV, PrewMS, et al.High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature, 2016; 529:490–495. DOI: 10.1038/nature16526.
13.
SlaymakerIM, GaoL, ZetscheB, et al.Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science, 2016; 351:84–88. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5227.
14.
NishimasuH, ShiX, IshiguroS, et al.Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space. Science, 2018; 361:1259–1262. DOI: 10.1126/science.aas9129.
15.
AnzaloneAV, RandolphPB, DavisJR, et al.Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature, 2019; 576:149–157. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4.