KnottGJ, DoudnaJA. CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science, 2018; 361:866–869. DOI: 10.1126/science.aat5011.
2.
HsuPD, LanderES, ZhangF. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 2014; 157:1262–1278. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010.
3.
AnzaloneAV, KoblanLW, LiuDR. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38:824–844. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9.
4.
MakarovaKS, WolfYI, IranzoJ, et al.Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2020; 18:67–83. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-019-0299-x.
5.
LiuL, LiX, WangJ, et al.Two distant catalytic sites are responsible for C2c2 RNase activities. Cell, 2017; 168:121–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.031.
6.
LiuL, ChenP, WangM, et al.C2c1-sgRNA complex structure reveals RNA-guided DNA cleavage mechanism. Mol Cell, 2017; 65:310–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.040.
7.
WuD, GuanX, ZhuY, et al.Structural basis of stringent PAM recognition by CRISPR-C2c1 in complex with sgRNA. Cell Res, 2017; 27:705–708. DOI: 10.1038/cr.2017.46.
8.
KomorAC, KimYB, PackerMS, et al.Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature, 2016; 533:420–424. DOI: 10.1038/nature17946.
9.
AnzaloneAV, RandolphPB, DavisJR, et al.Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature, 2019; 576:149–157. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4.
10.
LiX, WangY, LiuY, et al.Base editing with a Cpf1-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:324–327. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4102.
11.
WangX, LiJ, WangY, et al.Efficient base editing in methylated regions with a human APOBEC3A-Cas9 fusion. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:946–949. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4198.
12.
ZongY, SongQ, LiC, et al.Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:950–953. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4261.
13.
LiC, ZhangR, MengX, et al.Targeted, random mutagenesis of plant genes with dual cytosine and adenine base editors. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38:875–882. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0393-7.
14.
ZhangX, ZhuB, ChenL, et al.Dual base editor catalyzes both cytosine and adenine base conversions in human cells. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38:856–860. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0527-y.
15.
LinQ, JinS, ZongY, et al.High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired pegRNAs in plants. Nat Biotechnol 2021 Mar 25 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00868-w.
16.
JinS, ZongY, GaoQ, et al.Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice. Science, 2019; 364:292–295. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw7166.
17.
ZuoE, SunY, WeiW, et al.Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos. Science, 2019; 364:289–292. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav9973.
18.
ZuoE, SunY, YuanT, et al.A rationally engineered cytosine base editor retains high on-target activity while reducing both DNA and RNA off-target effects. Nat Methods, 2020; 17:600–604. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-0832-x.
19.
JinS, FeiH, ZhuZ, et al.Rationally designed APOBEC3B cytosine base editors with improved specificity. Mol Cell, 2020; 79:728–740.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.07.005.
20.
WangL, XueW, ZhangH, et al.Eliminating base-editor-induced genome-wide and transcriptome-wide off-target mutations. Nat Cell Biol, 2021; 23:552–563. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-021-00671-4.
21.
JinS, LinQ, LuoY, et al. Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants. Nat Biotechnol 2021 Apr 15 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00891-x.
22.
ShanQ, WangY, LiJ, et al.Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol, 2013; 31:686–688. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2650.
23.
ZhuH, LiC, GaoC. Applications of CRISPR-Cas in agriculture and plant biotechnology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2020; 21:661–677. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-00288-9.
24.
MengX, YuH, ZhangY, et al.Construction of a genome-wide mutant library in rice using CRISPR/Cas9. Mol Plant, 2017; 10:1238–1241. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.006.
25.
LuY, YeX, GuoR, et al.Genome-wide targeted mutagenesis in rice using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant, 2017; 10:1242–1245. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.007.
26.
ZhangH, SiX, JiX, et al.Genome editing of upstream open reading frames enables translational control in plants. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:894–898. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4202.
27.
WangY, ChengX, ShanQ, et al.Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol, 2014; 32:947–951. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2969.
28.
WangC, LiuQ, ShenY, et al.Clonal seeds from hybrid rice by simultaneous genome engineering of meiosis and fertilization genes. Nat Biotechnol, 2019; 37:283–286. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-018-0003-0.
29.
ZhangY, LiangZ, ZongY, et al.Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat Commun, 2016; 7:12617. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12617.
30.
LiangZ, ChenK, LiT, et al.Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun, 2017; 8:14261. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14261.
31.
YanS, TuZ, LiuZ, et al.A huntingtin knockin pig model recapitulates features of selective neurodegeneration in Huntington's disease. Cell, 2018; 173:989–1002. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.005.
32.
NiuY, ShenB, CuiY, et al.Generation of gene-modified cynomolgus monkey via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting in one-cell embryos. Cell, 2014; 156:836–843. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.027.
33.
ZhouY, SharmaJ, KeQ, et al.Atypical behaviour and connectivity in SHANK3-mutant macaques. Nature, 2019; 570:326–331. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1278-0.
34.
NiuD, WeiHJ, LinL, et al.Inactivation of porcine endogenous retrovirus in pigs using CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 2017; 357:1303–1307. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan4187.
35.
XuL, WangJ, LiuY, et al.CRISPR-edited stem cells in a patient with HIV and acute lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med, 2019; 381:1240–1247. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817426.