Retrons are bacterial genetic elements involved in anti-phage defense. They have the unique ability to reverse transcribe RNA into multicopy single-stranded DNA (msDNA) that remains covalently linked to their template RNA. Retrons coupled with CRISPR-Cas9 in yeast have been shown to improve the efficiency of precise genome editing via homology-directed repair (HDR). In human cells, HDR editing efficiency has been limited by challenges associated with delivering extracellular donor DNA encoding the desired mutation. In this study, we tested the ability of retrons to produce msDNA as donor DNA and facilitate HDR by tethering msDNA to guide RNA in HEK293T and K562 cells. Through heterologous reconstitution of retrons from multiple bacterial species with the CRISPR-Cas9 system, we demonstrated HDR rates of up to 11.4%. Overall, our findings represent the first step in extending retron-based precise gene editing to human cells.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HsuPD, LanderES, ZhangF. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 2014; 157:1262–1278. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010.
2.
XiongX, ChenM, LimWA, et al.CRISPR/Cas9 for human genome engineering and disease research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 2016; 17:131–154. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022258.
3.
CertoMT, RyuBY, AnnisJE, et al.Tracking genome engineering outcome at individual DNA breakpoints. Nat Methods, 2011; 8:671–676.
LinoCA, HarperJC, CarneyJP, et al.Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches. Drug Deliv, 2018; 25:1234–1257. DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964.
6.
DeverDP, BakRO, ReinischA, et al.CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells. Nature, 2016; 539:384–389. DOI: 10.1038/nature20134.
7.
SatherBD, Romano IbarraGS, SommerK, et al.Efficient modification of CCR5 in primary human hematopoietic cells using a megaTAL nuclease and AAV donor template. Sci Transl Med, 2015; 7:307ra156. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5530.
8.
WangJ, ExlineCM, DeClercqJJ, et al.Homology-driven genome editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using ZFN mRNA and AAV6 donors. Nat Biotechnol, 2015; 33:1256–1263. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3408.
9.
SimonAJ, EllingtonAD, FinkelsteinIJ. Retrons and their applications in genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47:11007–11019. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz865.
10.
InouyeS, HsuMY, EagleS, et al.Reverse transcriptase associated with the biosynthesis of the branched RNA-linked msDNA in Myxococcus xanthus. Cell, 1989; 56:709–717. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90593-x.
11.
YeeT, FuruichiT, InouyeS, et al.Multicopy single-stranded DNA isolated from a Gram-negative bacterium, Myxococcus xanthus. Cell, 1984; 38:203–209. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90541-5.
12.
ShimamotoT, HsuMY, InouyeS, et al.Reverse transcriptases from bacterial retrons require specific secondary structures at the 5′-end of the template for the cDNA priming reaction. J Biol Chem, 1993; 268:2684–2692.
13.
ShimamotoT, InouyeM, InouyeS. The formation of the 2′,5′-phosphodiester linkage in the cDNA priming reaction by bacterial reverse transcriptase in a cell-free system. J Biol Chem, 1995; 270:581–588. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.2.581.
14.
SharonE, ChenSA, KhoslaNM, et al.Functional genetic variants revealed by massively parallel precise genome editing. Cell, 2018; 175:544–557.e16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.057.
15.
SchubertMG, GoodmanDB, WannierTM, et al.High-throughput functional variant screens via in vivo production of single-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2021; 118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2018181118.
16.
FarzadfardF, LuTK. Synthetic biology. Genomically encoded analog memory with precise in vivo DNA writing in living cell populations. Science, 2014; 346:1256272. DOI: 10.1126/science.1256272.
17.
MirochnitchenkoO, InouyeS, InouyeM. Production of single-stranded DNA in mammalian cells by means of a bacterial retron. J Biol Chem, 1994; 269:2380–2383.
18.
ChuVT, WeberT, WefersB, et al.Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol, 2015; 33:543–548. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3198.
19.
GilbertLA, HorlbeckMA, AdamsonB, et al.Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell, 2014; 159:647–661. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029.
20.
GraySJ, FotiSB, SchwartzJW, et al.Optimizing promoters for recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated gene expression in the peripheral and central nervous system using self-complementary vectors. Hum Gene Ther, 2011; 22:1143–1153. DOI: 10.1089/hum.2010.245.
RichardsonCD, RayGJ, DeWittMA, et al.Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR-Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA. Nat Biotechnol, 2016; 34:339–344. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3481.
23.
MillmanA, BernheimA, Stokar-AvihailA, et al.Bacterial retrons function in anti-phage defense. Cell, 2020; 183:1551–1561.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.065.
24.
GaoL, Altae-TranH, BöhningF, et al.Diverse enzymatic activities mediate antiviral immunity in prokaryotes. Science, 2020; 369:1077–1084. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba0372.
25.
LeeK, MackleyVA, RaoA, et al.Synthetically modified guide RNA and donor DNA are a versatile platform for CRISPR-Cas9 engineering. Elife, 2017; 6. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.25312.
26.
RoyKR, SmithJD, VoneschSC, et al.Multiplexed precision genome editing with trackable genomic barcodes in yeast. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:512–520. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4137.
27.
ZhaoC, LiuF, PyleAM. An ultraprocessive, accurate reverse transcriptase encoded by a metazoan group II intron. RNA, 2018; 24:183–195. DOI: 10.1261/rna.063479.117.
28.
WannierTM, CiacciaPN, EllingtonAD, et al.Recombineering and MAGE. Nat Rev Methods Primers, 2021; 1:7. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-020-00006-x.
29.
WangC, ChengJKW, ZhangQ, et al.Microbial single-strand annealing proteins enable CRISPR gene-editing tools with improved knock-in efficiencies and reduced off-target effects. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49:e36. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1264.
30.
ReesHA, LiuDR. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat Rev Genet, 2018; 19:770–788. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-018-0059-1.
31.
KomorAC, KimYB, PackerMS, et al.Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature, 2016; 533:420–424. DOI: 10.1038/nature17946,
32.
GaudelliNM, KomorAC, ReesHA, et al.Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature, 2017; 551:464–471. DOI: 10.1038/nature24644.
33.
AnzaloneAV, RandolphPB, DavisJR, et al.Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature, 2019; 576:149–157. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4.
34.
RothemundPW. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature, 2006; 440:297–302. DOI: 10.1038/nature04586.
35.
DattaHJ, GlazerPM. Intracellular generation of single-stranded DNA for chromosomal triplex formation and induced recombination. Nucleic Acids Res, 2001; 29:5140–5147. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.24.5140.
36.
KeefeAD, PaiS, EllingtonA. Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2010; 9:537–550. DOI: 10.1038/nrd3141.
LimD, MaasWK. Reverse transcriptase-dependent synthesis of a covalently linked, branched DNA-RNA compound in E. coli B. Cell. 1989; 56:891–904. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90693-4.
39.
InouyeS, HerzerPJ, InouyeM. Two independent retrons with highly diverse reverse transcriptases in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1990; 87:942–945. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.3.942.
40.
SunJ, InouyeM, InouyeS. Association of a retroelement with a P4-like cryptic prophage (retronphage phi R73) integrated into the selenocystyl tRNA gene of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol, 1991; 173:4171–4181. DOI: 10.1128/jb.173.13.4171-4181.1991.
41.
HerzerPJ, InouyeS, InouyeM. Retron-Ec107 is inserted into the Escherichia coli genome by replacing a palindromic 34bp intergenic sequence. Mol Microbiol, 1992; 6:345–354. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01477.x.
42.
AhmedAM, ShimamotoT. msDNA-St85, a multicopy single-stranded DNA isolated from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 with the genomic analysis of its retron. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2003; 224:291–297. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00450-6.
43.
LampsonBC, SunJ, HsuMY, Vallejo-RamirezJ, InouyeS, InouyeM. Reverse transcriptase in a clinical strain of Escherichia coli: production of branched RNA-linked msDNA. Science, 1989; 243:1033–1038. DOI: 10.1126/science.2466332.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
