Versatile genome editing can be facilitated by the insertion of DNA sequences into specific locations. Current protocols involving CRISPR and Cas proteins rely on low efficiency homology-directed repair or non-homologous end joining with modified double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides as donors. Our simple protocol eliminates the need for expensive equipment, chemical and enzymatic donor DNA modification, or plasmid construction by using polyethylene glycol-calcium to deliver non-modified single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides and CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein into protoplasts. Plants regenerated via edited protoplasts achieved targeted insertion frequencies of up to 50% in Nicotiana benthamiana and 13.6% in rapid cycling Brassica oleracea without antibiotic selection. Using a 60 nt donor containing 27 nt in each homologous arm, 6/22 regenerated N. benthamiana plants showed targeted insertions, and one contained a precise insertion of a 6 bp HindIII site. The inserted sequences were transmitted to the next generation and invite the possibility of future exploration of versatile genome editing by targeted DNA insertion in plants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ČermákT, BaltesNJ, ČeganR, et al.High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome. Genome Biol, 2015; 16:232. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0796-9.
2.
SvitashevS, YoungJK, SchwartzC, et al.Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiol, 2015; 169:931–945. DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00793.
SauerNJ, Narváez-VásquezJ, MozorukJ, et al.Oligonucleotide-mediated genome editing provides precision and function to engineered nucleases and antibiotics in plants. Plant Physiol, 2016; 170:1917–1928. DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.01696.
5.
Dahan-MeirT, Filler-HayutS, Melamed-BessudoC, et al. Efficient in planta gene targeting in tomato using geminiviral replicons and the CRISPR/Cas9 system Plant J 2018;95:5–16. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13932.
6.
MikiD, ZhangW, ZengW, et al.CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation. Nat Commun, 2018; 9:1967. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04416-0.
7.
WolterF, KlemmJ, PuchtaH. Efficient in planta gene targeting in Arabidopsis using egg cell-specific expression of the Cas9 nuclease of Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J, 2018; 94:735–746. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13893.
8.
WolterF, PuchtaH. In planta gene targeting can be enhanced by the use of CRISPR/Cas12a. Plant J, 2019; 100:1083–1094. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14488.
9.
LiS, LiJ, HeY, et al.Precise gene replacement in rice by RNA transcript-templated homologous recombination. Nat Biotechnol, 2019; 37:445–450. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0065-7.
10.
VuTV, SivankalyaniV, KimEJ, et al.Highly efficient homology-directed repair using CRISPR/Cpf1-geminiviral replicon in tomato. Plant Biotechnol J, 2020; 18:2133–2143. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13373.
11.
AliZ, ShamiA, SedeekK, et al.Fusion of the Cas9 endonuclease and the VirD2 relaxase facilitates homology-directed repair for precise genome engineering in rice. Commun Biol, 2020; 3:44. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-0768-9.
12.
SchindeleA, DornA, PuchtaH. CRISPR/Cas brings plant biology and breeding into the fast lane. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2020; 61:7–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.08.006.
13.
LuY, TianY, ShenR, et al.Targeted, efficient sequence insertion and replacement in rice. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38:1402–1407. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0581-5.
14.
LiJY, MengX, ZongY, et al.Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Plants, 2016; 2:16139. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2016.139.
15.
DongOX, YuS, JainR, et al.Marker-free carotenoid-enriched rice generated through targeted gene insertion using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Commun, 2020; 11:1178. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14981-y.
16.
WeinthalD, TovkachA, ZeeviV, et al.Genome editing in plant cells by zinc finger nucleases. Trends Plant Sci, 2010; 15:308–321. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.03.001.
17.
FauserF, RothN, PacherM, et al.In planta gene targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012; 109:7535–7540. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202191109.
KrensFA, MolendijkL, WullemsGJ, et al.In vitro transformation of plant protoplasts with Ti-plasmid DNA. Nature, 1982; 296:72–74. DOI: 10.1038/296072a0.
20.
YooSD, ChoYH, SheenJ. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc, 2007; 2:1565–1572. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.199.
21.
LiJ, StoddardTJ, DemorestZL, et al.Multiplexed, targeted gene editing in Nicotiana benthamiana for glyco-engineering and monoclonal antibody production. Plant Biotechnol J, 2016; 14:533–542. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12403.
22.
WooJW, KimJ, KwonSI, et al.DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol, 2015; 33:1162–1164. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3389.
23.
AnderssonM, TuressonH, NicoliaA, et al.Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep, 2017; 36:117–128. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-016-2062-3.
24.
LinCS, HsuCT, YangLH, et al.Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis: from single-cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration. Plant Biotechnol J, 2018; 16:1295–1310. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12870.
25.
HsuCT, ChengYJ, YuanYH, et al.Application of Cas12a and nCas9-activation-induced cytidine deaminase for genome editing and as a non-sexual strategy to generate homozygous/multiplex edited plants in the allotetraploid genome of tobacco. Plant Mol Biol, 2019; 101:355–371. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-019-00907-w.
26.
ParkSC, ParkS, JeongYJ, et al.DNA-free mutagenesis of GIGANTEA in Brassica oleracea var. capitata using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Plant Biotechnol Rep, 2019; 13:483–489. DOI: 10.1007/s11816-019-00585-6.
27.
YuJ, TuL, SubburajS, et al.Simultaneous targeting of duplicated genes in Petunia protoplasts for flower color modification via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Plant Cell Rep, 2021; 40:1037–1045. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-020-02593-1.
28.
De BruynC, RuttinkT, EeckhautT, et al.Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in Witloof (Cichorium intybus var. foliosum). Front Genome Ed, 2021; 2:24. DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2020.604876.
29.
HsuCT, LeeWC, ChengYJ, et al.Genome editing and protoplast regeneration to study plant–pathogen interactions in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana. Front Genome Ed, 2021; 2:39. DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2020.627803.
30.
HuangRS, ShihHA, LaiMC, et al.Enhanced NK-92 Cytotoxicity by CRISPR genome engineering using Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Front Immunol, 2020; 11:1008. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01008.
31.
HiomK. Coping with DNA double strand breaks. DNA Repair, 2010; 9:1256–1263. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.018.
32.
PuchtaH, FauserF. Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. Plant J, 2014; 78:727–741. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12338.
33.
LinS, StaahlBT, AllaRK, et al.Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. eLife, 2014; 3:e04766. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.04766.
34.
KotogányE, DuditsD, HorváthGV, et al.A rapid and robust assay for detection of S-phase cell cycle progression in plant cells and tissues by using ethynyl deoxyuridine. Plant Methods, 2010; 6:5. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-6-5.
35.
KayaH, MikamiM, EndoA, et al.Highly specific targeted mutagenesis in plants using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:26871. DOI: 10.1038/srep26871.
36.
LawrensonT, ShorinolaO, StaceyN, et al.Induction of targeted, heritable mutations in barley and Brassica oleracea using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Genome Biol, 2015; 16:258. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0826-7.
37.
BudmanJ, ChuG. Processing of DNA for nonhomologous end-joining by cell-free extract. EMBO J, 2005; 24:849–860. DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600563.
38.
HillJT, DemarestBL, BisgroveBW, et al.Poly peak parser: method and software for identification of unknown indels using Sanger sequencing of PCR products. Dev Dyn, 2014; 243:1632–1636.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
