PFstats is a software developed for the extraction of useful information from protein multiple sequence alignments. By analyzing positional conservation and residue coevolution networks, the software allows the identification of structurally and functionally important residue groups and the discovery of probable functional subclasses. Furthermore, it contains tools for the identification of the possible biological significance of these findings. PFstats contains methods for maximizing the significance of alignments through filtering and weighting, residue conservation and coevolution analysis, automatic UniprotKb queries for residue–position annotation and many possible data visualization methods.
BachegaJ.F.R., NavarroM.V.A.S., BleicherL., et al.2009. Systematic structural studies of iron superoxide dismutases from human parasites and a statistical coupling analysis of metal binding specificity. Proteins, 77, 26–37.
3.
BernsteinF.C., KoetzleT.F., WilliamsG.J., et al.1977. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535–542.
4.
BettsM.J., and RussellR.B.2003. Amino acid properties and consequences of substitutions. In Bioinformatics for Geneticists. Eds: BarnesM.R., and GrayI.C.Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK.
5.
BleicherL., LemkeN., and GarrattR.C.2011. Using amino acid correlation and community detection algorithms to identify functional determinants in protein families. PLoS One, 6, e27786.
BrockM., MaerkerC., SchützA., et al.2002. Oxidation of propionate to pyruvate in Escherichia coli. Involvement of methylcitrate dehydratase and aconitase. Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 6184–6194.
8.
BussoC., Ferreira-JúniorJ.R., PaulelaJ.A., et al.2015. Coq7p relevant residues for protein activity and stability. Biochimie, 119, 92–102.
9.
ChakrabortyA., and ChakrabartiS.2015. A survey on prediction of specificity-determining sites in proteins. Brief. Bioinform. 16, 71–88.
10.
ChittoriS., SavithriH.S., and MurthyM.R.N.2011a. Crystal structure of Salmonella typhimurium 2-methylcitrate synthase: Insights on domain movement and substrate specificity. J. Struct. Biol. 174, 58–68.
11.
DagumL., and MenonR.1998. OpenMP: An industry standard API for shared-memory programming. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. 5, 46–55.
12.
DekkerJ.P., FodorA., AldrichR.W., et al.2004. A perturbation-based method for calculating explicit likelihood of evolutionary co-variance in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 20, 1565–1572.
13.
DimaR.I., and ThirumalaiD.2006. Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis. Protein Sci. 15, 258–268.
14.
ElshourbagyN.A., NearJ.C., KmetzP.J., et al.1990. Rat ATP citrate-lyase. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a full-length cDNA and mRNA abundance as a function of diet, organ, and age. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1430–1435.
15.
FatlandB. L., KeJ., AndersonM.D., et al.2002. Molecular characterization of a heteromeric ATP-citrate lyase that generates cytosolic acetyl-coenzyme A in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 130, 740–756.
16.
Da FonsecaN.J., Lima AfonsoM.Q., PedersolliN.G., et al.2017. Sequence, structure and function relationships in flaviviruses as assessed by evolutive aspects of its conserved non-structural protein domains. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 492, 565–571.
17.
GerikeU., HoughD.W., RussellN.J., et al.1998. Citrate synthase and 2-methylcitrate synthase: Structural, functional and evolutionary relationships. Microbiology, 144(Pt 4), 929–935.
18.
GloorG.B., MartinL.C., WahlL.M., et al.2005. Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions. Biochemistry, 44, 7156–7165.
19.
GöbelU., SanderC., SchneiderR., et al.1994. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins, 18, 309–317.
20.
HaY., McCannM.T., TuchmanM., et al.1997. Substrate-induced conformational change in a trimeric ornithine transcarbamoylase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 9550–9555.
21.
HenikoffS., and HenikoffJ.G.1994. Position-based sequence weights. J. Mol. Biol. 243, 574–578.
22.
JonesD.T., BuchanD.W.A., CozzettoD., et al.2012. PSICOV: Precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 28, 184–190.
23.
Lima AfonsoM., de LimaL., and BleicherL.2013. Residue correlation networks in nuclear receptors reflect functional specialization and the formation of the nematode-specific P-box. BMC Genomics, 14(Suppl 6), S1.
24.
LocklessS.W., and RanganathanR.1999. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families, Science, 286, 295–299.
25.
MaurusR., NguyenN.T., StokellD.J., et al.2003. Insights into the evolution of allosteric properties. The NADH binding site of hexameric type II citrate synthases. Biochemistry, 42, 5555–5565.
26.
MorcosF., PagnaniA., LuntB., et al.2011. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, E1293–E1301.
27.
MurphyL.R., WallqvistA., and LevyR.M.2000. Simplified amino acid alphabets for protein fold recognition and implications for folding. Protein Eng. 13, 149–152.
28.
NaumoffD.G., XuY., GlansdorffN., et al.2004. Retrieving sequences of enzymes experimentally characterized but erroneously annotated: The case of the putrescine carbamoyltransferase. BMC Genomics, 5, 52.
29.
NguyenN.T., MaurusR., StokellD.J., et al.2001. Comparative analysis of folding and substrate binding sites between regulated hexameric type II citrate synthases and unregulated dimeric type I enzymes. Biochemistry, 40, 13177–13187.
30.
PazosF., Helmer-CitterichM., AusielloG., et al.1997. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol., 271, 511–523.
31.
PommiéC., LevadouxS., SabatierR., et al.2004. IMGT standardized criteria for statistical analysis of immunoglobulin V-REGION amino acid properties. J. Mol. Recognit., 17, 17–32.
32.
RegoN., and KoesD.2015. 3Dmol.js: Molecular visualization with WebGL. Bioinformatics, 31, 1322–1324.
33.
Rios-AnjosR.M., CamandonaV.L., BleicherL., et al.2017. Structural and functional mapping of Rtg2p determinants involved in retrograde signaling and aging of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One, 12, e0177090.
34.
ShiD., MorizonoH., HaY., et al.1998. 1.85-A resolution crystal structure of human ornithine transcarbamoylase complexed with N-phosphonacetyl-L-ornithine. Catalytic mechanism and correlation with inherited deficiency. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34247–34254.
35.
ShiD., AllewellN.M., and TuchmanM.2015. From genome to structure and back again: A family portrait of the transcarbamylases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 18836–18864.
36.
SimmerJ.P., KellyR.E., RinkerA.G., et al.1990. Mammalian dihydroorotase: Nucleotide sequence, peptide sequences, and evolution of the dihydroorotase domain of the multifunctional protein CAD. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 174–178.
37.
StokellD.J., DonaldL.J., MaurusR., et al.2003a. Probing the roles of key residues in the unique regulatory NADH binding site of type II citrate synthase of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 35435–35443.
38.
SundaresanR., EbiharaA., KuramitsuS., et al.2015. Crystal structure analysis of ornithine transcarbamylase from Thermus thermophilus–HB8 provides insights on the plasticity of the active site. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 465, 174–179.
39.
UniProt: A hub for protein information. 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43(D1), D204–D212.
40.
WangJ., and WangW.1999. A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 1033–1038.
41.
YachdavG., WilzbachS., RauscherB., et al.2016. MSAViewer: Interactive JavaScript visualization of multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 42, btw474.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
