Noncoding ribonucleic acids (RNA) play a critical role in a wide variety of cellular processes, ranging from regulating gene expression to post-translational modification and protein synthesis. Their activity is modulated by highly dynamic exchanges between three-dimensional conformational substates, which are difficult to characterize experimentally and computationally. Here, we present an innovative, entirely kinematic computational procedure to efficiently explore the native ensemble of RNA molecules. Our procedure projects degrees of freedom onto a subspace of conformation space defined by distance constraints in the tertiary structure. The dimensionality reduction enables efficient exploration of conformational space. We show that the conformational distributions obtained with our method broadly sample the conformational landscape observed in NMR experiments. Compared to normal mode analysis-based exploration, our procedure diffuses faster through the experimental ensemble while also accessing conformational substates to greater precision. Our results suggest that conformational sampling with a highly reduced but fully atomistic representation of noncoding RNA expresses key features of their dynamic nature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-BluwiI., SiméonT., and CortésJ.2012. Motion planning algorithms for molecular simulations: a survey. Comput. Sci. Rev., 6, 125–143.
2.
Al-BluwiI., VaissetM., SiméonT., et al.2013. Modeling protein conformational transitions by a combination of coarsegrained normal mode analysis and robotics-inspired methods. BMC Struct. Biol., 13(Suppl 1), S2.
3.
AltonaC., and SundaralingamM.1972. Conformational analysis of the sugar ring in nucleosides and nucleotides: new description using the concept of pseudorotation. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 94, 8205–8212.
4.
BernauerJ., HuangX., SimA.Y.L., et al.2011. Fully differentiable coarse-grained and all-atom knowledge-based potentials for RNA structure evaluation. RNA, 17, 1066–1075.
5.
BuddayD., LeyendeckerS., and van den BedemH.2015. Geometric analysis characterizes molecular rigidity in generic and non-generic protein configurations. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 83, 36–47.
6.
CanutescuA.A., and DunbrackR.L.2003. Cyclic coordinate descent: a robotics algorithm for protein loop closure. Protein Sci. 12, 963–972.
7.
ChennubhotlaC., RaderA.J., YangL.W., et al.2005. Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies. Phys. Biol., 2, S173.
8.
CléryA., BlatterM., and AllainF.H.T.2008. RNA recognition motifs: boring? Not quite. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 290–298.
9.
CooperT.A., WanL., and DreyfussG.2009. RNA and disease. Cell, 136, 777–793.
10.
CortésJ., SiméonT., Remaud-SiméonM., et al.2004. Geometric algorithms for the conformational analysis of long protein loops. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 956–967.
11.
CoutsiasE.A., SeokC., JacobsonM.P., et al.2004. A kinematic view of loop closure. J. Comput. Chem., 25, 510–528.
12.
CruzJ.A., and WesthofE.2009. The dynamic landscapes of RNA architecture. Cell, 136, 604–609.
13.
DasR., and BakerD.2007. Automated de novo prediction of nativelike RNA tertiary structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 14664–14669.
14.
DasR., KaranicolasJ., and BakerD.2010. Atomic accuracy in predicting and designing noncanonical RNA structure. Nat. Methods, 7, 291–294.
15.
DorsettY., and TuschlT.2004. siRNAs: applications in functional genomics and potential as therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 3, 318–329.
16.
FonsecaR., PachovD.V., BernauerJ., et al.2014. Characterizing RNA ensembles from NMR data with kinematic models. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9562–9572.
17.
FrellsenJ., MoltkeI., ThiimM., et al.2009. A probabilistic model of RNA conformational space. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000406–e1000406.
18.
FrenkelD., and SmitB.2001. Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, NY.
19.
GuoP.2010. The emerging field of RNA nanotechnology. Nat. Nanotechnol., 5, 833–842.
20.
HalperinD., and OvermarsM.H.1994. Spheres, molecules, and hidden surface removal. Comput. Geom., 11, 113–122.
21.
HoB.K., CoutsiasE.A., SeokC., et al.2005. The flexibility in the proline ring couples to the protein backbone. Protein Sci. 14, 1011–1018.
KimH., AbeysirigunawardenS.C., ChenK., et al.2014. Protein-guided RNA dynamics during early ribosome assembly. Nature, 506, 334–338.
24.
LandauD.P., and BinderK.2009. A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25.
LemieuxS., and MajorF.2002. RNA canonical and non-canonical base pairing types: a recognition method and complete repertoire. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 4250–4263.
26.
LeontisN.B., LescouteA., and WesthofE.2006. The building blocks and motifs of RNA architecture. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 16, 279–287.
27.
LeulliotN., and VaraniG.2001. Current topics in RNA-protein recognition: control of specificity and biological function through induced fit and conformational capture. Biochemistry, 40, 7947–7956.
28.
LevittM., and WarshelA.1978. Extreme conformational flexibility of the furanose ring in DNA and RNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 2607–2613.
29.
LipfertJ., DasR., ChuV.B., et al.2007. Structural transitions and thermodynamics of a glycine-dependent riboswitch from vibrio cholerae. J. Mol. Biol., 365, 1393–1406.
30.
Lopéz-BlancoJ.R., GarzónJ.I., and ChacónP.2011. iMod: multipurpose normal mode analysis in internal coordinates. Bioinformatics, 27, 2843–2850.
31.
LyskovS., ChouF.C., ConchúirS., et al.2013. Serverification of molecular modeling applications: the rosetta online server that includes everyone (rosie). PLoS One, 8, e63906.
32.
MaJ.2005. Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. Structure, 13, 373–380.
33.
PachovD., and van den BedemH.2015. Nullspace sampling with holonomic constraints reveals molecular mechanisms of protein gas. PLoS Comput. Biol., 11, e1004361.
34.
RotherK., RotherM., SkibaP., et al.2014. Automated modeling of RNA 3d structure. Methods Mol. Biol., 1097, 395–415.
35.
SchröderG.F., BrungerA.T., and LevittM.2007. Combining efficient conformational sampling with a deformable elastic network model facilitates structure refinement at low resolution. Structure, 15, 1630–1641.
36.
ShehuA., ClementiC., and KavrakiL.2006. Modeling protein conformational ensembles: from missing loops to equilibrium fluctuations. Proteins, 65, 164–179.
37.
ThomasS., SongG., and AmatoN.M.2005. Protein folding by motion planning. Phys. Biol., 2, S148.
van den BedemH., and FraserJ.S.2015. Integrative, dynamic structural biology at atomic resolution—it's about time. Nat. Methods, 61, 307–318.
40.
van den BedemH., LotanI., LatombeJ.C., et al.2005. Real-space protein-model completion: an inverse-kinematics approach. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 61, 2–13.
41.
WellsS., MenorS., HespenheideB., et al.2005. Constrained geometric simulation of diffusive motion in proteins. Phys. Biol., 2, S127.
42.
YangH., JossinetF., LeontisN., et al.2003. Tools for the automatic identification and classification of RNA base pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 32:3450–3460.
43.
YaoP., DhanikA., MarzN., et al.2008. Efficient algorithms to explore conformation spaces of flexible protein loops. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 5, 534–545.
44.
YaoP., ZhangL., and LatombeJ.C.2012. Sampling-based exploration of folded state of a protein under kinematic and geometric constraints. Proteins, 80, 25–43.
45.
ZavodszkyM.I., LeiM., ThorpeM.F., et al.2004. Modeling correlated main-chain motions in proteins for flexible molecular recognition. Proteins, 57, 243–261.
46.
ZhangQ., StelzerA.C., FisherC.K., et al.2007. Visualizing spatially correlated dynamics that directs RNA conformational transitions. Nature, 450, 1263–1267.
47.
ZhouJ., ShuY., GuoP., et al.2011. Dual functional RNA nanoparticles containing phi29 motor pRNA and anti-gp120 aptamer for cell-type specific delivery and HIV-1 inhibition. Methods, 54, 284–294.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
