Notch signaling controls cell fate decisions and regulates multiple biological processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Computational modeling of the deterministic simulation of Notch signaling has provided important insight into the possible molecular mechanisms that underlie the switch from the undifferentiated stem cell to the differentiated cell. Here, we constructed a stochastic model of a Notch signaling model containing Hes1, Notch1, RBP-Jk, Mash1, Hes6, and Delta. mRNA and protein were represented as a discrete state, and 334 reactions were employed for each biochemical reaction using a graphics processing unit–accelerated Gillespie scheme. We employed the tuning of 40 molecular mechanisms and revealed several potential mediators capable of enabling the switch from cell stemness to differentiation. These effective mediators encompass different aspects of cellular regulations, including the nuclear transport of Hes1, the degradation of mRNA (Hes1 and Notch1) and protein (Notch1), the association between RBP-Jk and Notch intracellular domain (NICD), and the cleavage efficiency of the NICD. These mechanisms overlap with many modifiers that have only recently been discovered to modulate the Notch signaling output, including microRNA action, ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, and the competitive binding of the RBP-Jk-DNA complex. Moreover, we identified the degradation of Hes1 mRNA and nuclear transport of Hes1 as the dominant mechanisms that were capable of abolishing the cell state transition induced by other molecular mechanisms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrawalS., ArcherC., and SchafferD.V.2009. Computational models of the Notch network elucidate mechanisms of context-dependent signaling. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000390.
2.
AmakawaR., JingW., OzawaK., et al.1993. Human Jk recombination signal binding protein gene (IGKJRB): comparison with its mouse homologue. Genomics, 17, 306–315.
3.
AnderssonE.R., SandbergR., and LendahlU.2011. Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function. Development, 138, 3593–3612.
4.
Artavanis-TsakonasS., and MuskavitchM.A.2010. Notch: the past, the present, and the future. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 92, 1–29.
5.
Artavanis-TsakonasS., RandM.D., and LakeR.J.1999. Notch signaling: Cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science, 284, 770–776.
6.
BaeS., BesshoY., HojoM., and KageyamaR.2000. The bHLH gene Hes6, an inhibitor of Hes1, promotes neuronal differentiation. Development, 127, 2933–2943.
7.
BaekJ.H., HatakeyamaJ., SakamotoS., et al.2006. Persistent and high levels of Hes1 expression regulate boundary formation in the developing central nervous system. Development, 133, 2467–2476.
8.
BarrioM., BurrageK., LeierA., and TianT.2006. Oscillatory regulation of Hes1: discrete stochastic delay modelling and simulation. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2, e117.
9.
BartonA., and FendrikA.J.2013. Sustained vs. oscillating expressions of Ngn2, Dll1 and Hes1: a model of neural differentiation of embryonic telencephalon. J. Theor. Biol., 328, 1–8.
10.
BernardF., KrejciA., HousdenB., et al.2010. Specificity of Notch pathway activation: twist controls the transcriptional output in adult muscle progenitors. Development, 137, 2633–2642.
11.
BetschingerJ., NicholsJ., DietmannS., et al.2013. Exit from pluripotency is gated by intracellular redistribution of the bHLH transcription factor Tfe3. Cell, 153, 335–347.
12.
BonevB., StanleyP., and PapalopuluN.2012. MicroRNA-9 modulates Hes1 ultradian oscillations by forming a double-negative feedback loop. Cell Rep., 2, 10–18.
13.
BorggrefeT., and LiefkeR.2012. Fine-tuning of the intracellular canonical Notch signaling pathway. Cell Cycle, 11, 264–276.
14.
BrouC., LogeatF., LecourtoisM., et al.1994. Inhibition of the DNA-binding activity of Drosophila suppressor of hairless and of its human homolog, KBF2/RBP-J kappa, by direct protein-protein interaction with Drosophila hairless. Genes Dev., 8, 2491–2503.
15.
CampanelliM., and GedeonT.2010. Somitogenesis clock-wave initiation requires differential decay and multiple binding sites for clock protein. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000728.
16.
CayouetteM., and RaffM.2002. Asymmetric segregation of Numb: a mechanism for neural specification from Drosophila to mammals. Nat. Neurosci., 5, 1265–1269.
17.
ChenH., ThiagalingamA., ChopraH., et al.1997. Conservation of the Drosophila lateral inhibition pathway in human lung cancer: a hairy-related protein (HES-1) directly represses achaete-scute homolog-1 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 5355–5360.
18.
CinquinO.2007. Repressor dimerization in the zebrafish somitogenesis clock. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e32.
19.
CollierJ.R., MonkN.A., MainiP.K., and LewisJ.H.1996. Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: a mathematical model of delta-notch intercellular signalling. J. Theor. Biol., 183, 429–446.
20.
FinebergS.K., DattaP., SteinC.S., and DavidsonB.L.2012. MiR-34a represses Numbl in murine neural progenitor cells and antagonizes neuronal differentiation. PLoS One, 7, e38562.
21.
FoltzD.R., and NyeJ.S.2001. Hyperphosphorylation and association with RBP of the intracellular domain of Notch1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 286, 484–492.
22.
GillespieD.T.2001. Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems. J. Chem. Phys., 115, 1716–1733.
23.
GillespieD.T.2007. Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 58, 35–55.
24.
GilmanA., and ArkinA.P.2002. Genetic “code”: representations and dynamical models of genetic components and networks. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet., 3, 341–369.
25.
GiotL., BaderJ.S., BrouwerC., et al.2003. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 302, 1727–1736.
26.
GotzA.W., WilliamsonM.J., XuD., et al.2012. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8, 1542–1555.
27.
GuibingaG.H., HrustanovicG., BouicK., et al.2012. MicroRNA-mediated dysregulation of neural developmental genes in HPRT deficiency: clues for Lesch-Nyhan disease?. Hum. Mol. Genet., 21, 609–622.
28.
GuruharshaK.G., KankelM.W., and Artavanis-TsakonasS.2012. The Notch signalling system: recent insights into the complexity of a conserved pathway. Nat. Rev. Genet., 13, 654–666.
29.
HirataH., YoshiuraS., OhtsukaT., et al.2002. Oscillatory expression of the bHLH factor Hes1 regulated by a negative feedback loop. Science, 298, 840–843.
30.
HuttnerW.B., and KosodoY.2005. Symmetric versus asymmetric cell division during neurogenesis in the developing vertebrate central nervous system. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 17, 648–657.
31.
JarriaultS., BrouC., LogeatF., et al.1995. Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature, 377, 355–358.
32.
KageyamaR., NiwaY., ShimojoH., et al.2010. Ultradian oscillations in Notch signaling regulate dynamic biological events. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 92, 311–331.
33.
KageyamaR., OhtsukaT., HatakeyamaJ., and OhsawaR.2005. Roles of bHLH genes in neural stem cell differentiation. Exp. Cell Res., 306, 343–348.
34.
KageyamaR., OhtsukaT., and KobayashiT.2007. The Hes gene family: repressors and oscillators that orchestrate embryogenesis. Development, 134, 1243–1251.
35.
KageyamaR., OhtsukaT., ShimojoH., and ImayoshiI.2009. Dynamic regulation of Notch signaling in neural progenitor cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 21, 733–740.
36.
KankelM.W., HurlbutG.D., UpadhyayG., et al.2007. Investigating the genetic circuitry of mastermind in Drosophila, a notch signal effector. Genetics, 177, 2493–2505.
37.
KaoH.Y., OrdentlichP., Koyano-NakagawaN., et al.1998. A histone deacetylase corepressor complex regulates the Notch signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev., 12, 2269–2277.
38.
KiparissidesA., KoutinasM., MossT., et al.2011. Modelling the Delta1/Notch1 pathway: in search of the mediator(s) of neural stem cell differentiation. PLoS One, 6, e14668.
39.
KobayashiT., MizunoH., ImayoshiI., et al.2009. The cyclic gene Hes1 contributes to diverse differentiation responses of embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 23, 1870–1875.
40.
KochU., LehalR., and RadtkeF.2013. Stem cells living with a Notch. Development, 140, 689–704.
41.
KovallR.A.2007. Structures of CSL, Notch and Mastermind proteins: piecing together an active transcription complex. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 17, 117–127.
42.
KovallR.A., and BlacklowS.C.2010. Mechanistic insights into Notch receptor signaling from structural and biochemical studies. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 92, 31–71.
43.
Koyano-NakagawaN., KimJ., AndersonD., and KintnerC.2000. Hes6 acts in a positive feedback loop with the neurogenins to promote neuronal differentiation. Development, 127, 4203–4216.
44.
LaiK., RobertsonM.J., and SchafferD.V.2004. The sonic hedgehog signaling system as a bistable genetic switch. Biophys. J., 86, 2748–2757.
45.
LewisJ.2003. Autoinhibition with transcriptional delay: a simple mechanism for the zebrafish somitogenesis oscillator. Curr. Biol., 13, 1398–1408.
46.
LewisJ., HanischA., and HolderM.2009. Notch signaling, the segmentation clock, and the patterning of vertebrate somites. J. Biol., 8, 44.
47.
LiuW.G., SchmidtB., and Muller-WittigW.2011. CUDA-BLASTP: accelerating BLASTP on CUDA-enabled graphics hardware. IEEE-ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 8, 1678–1684.
48.
MatsumotoM., and NishimuraT.1998. Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul., 8, 3–30.
49.
MazzoneM., SelforsL.M., AlbeckJ., et al.2010. Dose-dependent induction of distinct phenotypic responses to Notch pathway activation in mammary epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 5012–5017.
50.
McGillM.A., DhoS.E., WeinmasterG., and McGladeC.J.2009. Numb regulates post-endocytic trafficking and degradation of Notch1. J. Biol. Chem., 284, 26427–26438.
51.
McGillM.A., and McGladeC.J.2003. Mammalian numb proteins promote notch1 receptor ubiquitination and degradation of the notch1 intracellular domain. J. Biol. Chem., 278, 23196–23203.
52.
MonkN.A.2003. Oscillatory expression of Hes1, p53, and NF-kappaB driven by transcriptional time delays. Curr. Biol., 13, 1409–1413.
53.
Mummery-WidmerJ.L., YamazakiM., StoegerT., et al.2009. Genome-wide analysis of Notch signalling in Drosophila by transgenic RNAi. Nature, 458, 987–992.
54.
NakamuraK., KosugiI., LeeD.Y., et al.2012. Prolyl isomerase Pin1 regulates neuronal differentiation via beta-catenin. Mol. Cell Biol., 32, 2966–2978.
55.
NamY., SlizP., SongL.Y., et al.2006. Structural basis for cooperativity in recruitment of MAML coactivators to Notch transcription complexes. Cell, 124, 973–983.
56.
NishiM., AkutsuH., MasuiS., et al.2011. A distinct role for Pin1 in the induction and maintenance of pluripotency. J. Biol. Chem., 286, 11593–11603.
57.
PerdigotoC.N., and BardinA.J.2013. Sending the right signal: Notch and stem cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1830, 2307–2322.
58.
PoellingerL., and LendahlU.2008. Modulating Notch signaling by pathway-intrinsic and pathway-extrinsic mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 18, 449–454.
59.
RustighiA., TiberiL., SoldanoA., et al.2009. The prolyl-isomerase Pin1 is a Notch1 target that enhances Notch1 activation in cancer. Nat. Cell Biol., 11, 133–142.
60.
SajA., ArzimanZ., StempfleD., et al.2010. A combined ex vivo and in vivo RNAi screen for notch regulators in Drosophila reveals an extensive notch interaction network. Dev. Cell, 18, 862–876.
61.
SchefferD., SageC., CoreyD.P., and PingaultV.2007. Gene expression profiling identifies Hes6 as a transcriptional target of ATOH1 in cochlear hair cells. FEBS Lett., 581, 4651–4656.
62.
SchroterC., AresS., MorelliL.G., et al.2012. Topology and dynamics of the zebrafish segmentation clock core circuit. PLoS Biol., 10, e1001364.
63.
ShalabyN.A., ParksA.L., MorrealeE.J., et al.2009. A screen for modifiers of notch signaling uncovers Amun, a protein with a critical role in sensory organ development. Genetics, 182, 1061–1076.
64.
ShayaO., and SprinzakD.2011. From Notch signaling to fine-grained patterning: modeling meets experiments. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 21, 732–739.
65.
ShenQ., ZhongW., JanY.N., and TempleS.2002. Asymmetric Numb distribution is critical for asymmetric cell division of mouse cerebral cortical stem cells and neuroblasts. Development, 129, 4843–4853.
66.
ShimojoH., OhtsukaT., and KageyamaR.2008. Oscillations in notch signaling regulate maintenance of neural progenitors. Neuron, 58, 52–64.
67.
ShimojoH., OhtsukaT., and KageyamaR.2011. Dynamic expression of notch signaling genes in neural stem/progenitor cells. Front. Neurosci., 5, 78.
68.
SprinzakD., LakhanpalA., LebonL., et al.2010. Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature, 465, 86–90.
69.
SprinzakD., LakhanpalA., LebonL., et al.2011. Mutual inactivation of notch receptors and ligands facilitates developmental patterning. PLoS Comput. Biol., 7, e1002069.
70.
TakebayashiK., SasaiY., SakaiY., et al.1994. Structure, chromosomal locus, and promoter analysis of the gene encoding the mouse helix-loop-helix factor HES-1. Negative autoregulation through the multiple N box elements. J. Biol. Chem., 269, 5150–5156.
71.
TanS.L., OhtsukaT., GonzalezA., and KageyamaR.2012. MicroRNA9 regulates neural stem cell differentiation by controlling Hes1 expression dynamics in the developing brain. Genes Cells, 17, 952–961.
72.
WangH., ZouJ., ZhaoB., et al.2011. Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved and divergent features of Notch1/RBPJ binding in human and murine T-lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 14908–14913.
73.
WilkinsonD.J.2009. Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems. Nat. Rev. Genet., 10, 122–133.
74.
WilkinsonD.J.2012. Stochastic Modelling for Systems Biology. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
75.
WilsonJ.J., and KovallR.A.2006. Crystal structure of the CSL-Notch-Mastermind ternary complex bound to DNA. Cell, 124, 985–996.
76.
WingenderE.2008. The TRANSFAC project as an example of framework technology that supports the analysis of genomic regulation. Brief Bioinform., 9, 326–332.
77.
WuJ., HongB., TakedaT., and GuoJ.T.2012. High performance transcription factor-DNA docking with GPU computing. Proteome Sci., 10 Suppl1, S17.
78.
XieZ.R., YangH.T., LiuW.C., and HwangM.J.2007. The role of microRNA in the delayed negative feedback regulation of gene expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 358, 722–726.
79.
ZhengY., LinL., and ZhengZ.2008. TGF-alpha induces upregulation and nuclear translocation of Hes1 in glioma cell. Cell Biochem. Funct., 26, 692–700.
80.
ZhongW., and ChiaW.2008. Neurogenesis and asymmetric cell division. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 18, 4–11.
81.
ZhouS., FujimuroM., HsiehJ.J., et al.2000. SKIP, a CBF1-associated protein, interacts with the ankyrin repeat domain of NotchIC To facilitate NotchIC function. Mol. Cell Biol., 20, 2400–2410.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
