Single-cell transcriptomics and in situ imaging of murine pancreas upon partial reprogramming in vivo reveal transcriptional dynamics upon Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and cMyc (OSKM) induction. Interestingly, transcriptomic signatures of partial reprogramming observed in pancreas are shared by several tissues upon OSKM induction as well as during in vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts, pointing to the existence of conserved pathways critical for early reprogramming, regeneration, and rejuvenation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbadM, MosteiroL, PantojaC, et al. Reprogramming in vivo produces teratomas and iPS cells with totipotency features. Nature, 2013; 502(7471):340–345; doi: 10.1038/nature12586
2.
ChondronasiouD, GillD, MosteiroL, et al. Multi-omic rejuvenation of naturally aged tissues by a single cycle of transient reprogramming. Aging Cell, 2022; 21(3):e13578; doi: 10.1111/acel.13578
3.
LiuX, OuyangJF, RosselloFJ, et al. Reprogramming roadmap reveals route to human induced trophoblast stem cells. Nature, 2020; 586(7827):101–107; doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2734-6
4.
OhnishiK, SemiK, YamamotoT, et al. Premature termination of reprogramming in vivo leads to cancer development through altered epigenetic regulation. Cell, 2014; 156(4):663–677; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.005
5.
SchiebingerG, ShuJ, TabakaM, et al. Optimal-transport analysis of single-cell gene expression identifies developmental trajectories in reprogramming. Cell, 2019; 176(4):928–943e922; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.006
6.
SinghPB, ZhakupovaA. Age reprogramming: Cell rejuvenation by partial reprogramming. Development, 2022; 149(22):dev200755; doi: 10.1242/dev.200755
