Abstract
Abstract
For successful cartilage tissue engineering, the ability to generate a high number of chondrocytes in vitro while avoiding terminal differentiation or de-differentiation is critical. The ability to accomplish this by using the abundant and easily sampled costal cartilage could provide a practical alternative to the use of articular cartilage and mesenchymal stem cells. Chondrocytes isolated from pig costal cartilage were expanded in either serum-free medium with FGF2 (SFM) or fetal bovine serum-containing medium (SCM), under either high (21%) or low (5%) oxygen conditions. Overall, chondrocytes cultured in SFM and low oxygen (Low-SFM) demonstrated the highest cell growth rate (p < 0.05). The effect of passage number on the differentiation status of the chondrocytes was analyzed by alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining and real-time PCR for known chondrocyte quality markers. AP staining indicated that chondrocytes grown in SCM had a higher proportion of terminally differentiated (hypertrophic) chondrocytes (p < 0.05). At the mRNA level, expression ratios of ACAN/VCAN and COL2/COL1 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in cells expanded in Low-SFM, indicating reduced de-differentiation. In vitro re-differentiation capacity was assessed after a 6-week induction, and chondrocytes grown in Low-SFM showed similar expression ratios of COL2/COL1 and ACAN/VCAN to native cartilage. Proteomic analysis of in vitro produced cartilage indicated that the Low-SFM condition most closely matched the proteomic profile of native costal and articular cartilage. In conclusion, Low-SFM culture conditions resulted in improved cell growth rates, reduced levels of de-differentiation during expansion, greater ability to re-differentiate into cartilage on induction, and an improved proteomic profile that resembles that of in vivo cartilage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
