In vitro production of porcine embryos by means of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is limited by great inefficienciy. The present study investigated chromatin and nucleolar dynamics in porcine embryos developed in vivo (IV) and compared this physiological standard to that of embryos produced by IVF, parthenogenetic activation (PA), or SCNT. In contrast to IV embryos, chromatin spatial and temporal dynamics in PA, IVF, and SCNT embryos were altered; starting with aberrant chromatin–nuclear envelope interactions at the two-cell stage, delayed chromatin decondensation and nucleolar development at the four-cell stage, and ultimately culminating in failure of proper first lineage segregation at the blastocyst stage, demonstrated by poorly defined inner cell mass. Interestingly, in vitro produced (IVP) embryos also lacked a heterochromatin halo around nucleolar precursors, indicating imperfections in global chromatin remodeling after fertilization/activation. Porcine IV-produced zygotes and embryos display a well-synchronized pattern of chromatin dynamics compatible with genome activation and regular nucleolar formation at the four-cell stage. Production of porcine embryos under in vitro conditions by IVF, PA, or SCNT is associated with altered chromatin remodeling, delayed nucleolar formation, and poorly defined lineage segregation at the blastocyst stage, which in turn may impair their developmental capacity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhmedK., DehghaniH., Rugg-GunnP.et al.2010. Global chromatin architecture reflects pluripotency and lineage commitment in the early mouse embryo. PLoS One, 5:e10531.
2.
Andreu-VieyraC.V., ChenR., AgnoJ.E.et al.2010. MLL2 is required in oocytes for bulk histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation and transcriptional silencing. PLoS Biol., 8,
3.
BeekmanC., NichaneM., DeC.S.et al.2006. Evolutionarily conserved role of nucleostemin: controlling proliferation of stem/progenitor cells during early vertebrate development. Mol. Cell Biol., 26:9291–9301.
4.
Bourc'hisD., VoinnetO.2010. A small-RNA perspective on gametogenesis, fertilization, and early zygotic development. Science, 330:617–622.
5.
CorryG.N., TanasijevicB., BarryE.R.et al.2009. Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms during preimplantation development. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today, 87:297–313.
6.
CozziE., TallacchiniM., FlanaganE.B.et al.2009. The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes—chapter 1: key ethical requirements and progress toward the definition of an international regulatory framework. Xenotransplantation, 16:203–214.
EfroniS., DuttaguptaR., ChengJ.et al.2008. Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2:437–447.
9.
EllisD.J., JenkinsH., WhitfieldW.G.et al.1997. GST-lamin fusion proteins act as dominant negative mutants in Xenopus egg extract and reveal the function of the lamina in DNA replication. J. Cell Sci., 110,Pt. 20:2507–2518.
10.
FulkaH., FulkaJ.Jr.2010. Nucleolar transplantation in oocytes and zygotes: challenges for further research. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 16:63–67.
11.
GavrilovaE.V., KuznetsovaI.S., EnukashviliN.I.et al.2009. [Localization of satellite DNA and associated protein in respect to nucleolar precursor bodies in one- and two-cell mouse embryos]Tsitologiia, 51:455–464.
12.
GilM.A., CuelloC., ParrillaI.et al.2010. Advances in swine in vitro embryo production technologies. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 45,Suppl. 2:40–48.
13.
GruenbaumY., MargalitA., GoldmanR.D.et al.2005. The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 6:21–31.
14.
GuardaA., BologneseF., BonapaceI.M.et al.2009. Interaction between the inner nuclear membrane lamin B receptor and the heterochromatic methyl binding protein, MeCP2. Exp. Cell Res., 315:1895–1903.
15.
HeS., PantD., SchiffmacherA.et al.2006. Developmental expression of pluripotency determining factors in caprine embryos: novel pattern of NANOG protein localization in the nucleolus. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 73:1512–1522.
16.
Hernandez-VerdunD., RousselP., ThiryM.et al.2010. The nucleolus: structure/function relationship in RNA metabolism. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA, 1:415–431.
17.
HolmerL., WormanH.J.2001. Inner nuclear membrane proteins: functions and targeting. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 58:1741–1747.
18.
HyttelP., MadsenI.1987. Rapid method to prepare mammalian oocytes and embryos for transmission electron microscopy. Acta Anat. (Basel), 129:12–14.
19.
HyttelP., NiemannH.1990. Ultrastructure of porcine embryos following development in vitro versus in vivo. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 27:136–144.
20.
HyttelP., LaurincikJ., RosenkranzC.et al.2000a. Nucleolar proteins and ultrastructure in preimplantation porcine embryos developed in vivo. Biol. Reprod., 63:1848–1856.
21.
HyttelP., LaurincikJ., RosenkranzC.et al.2000b. Nucleolar proteins and ultrastructure in preimplantation porcine embryos developed in vivo. Biol. Reprod., 63:1848–1856.
22.
HyttelP., LaurincikJ., ZakhartchenkoV.et al.2001. Nucleolar protein allocation and ultrastructure in bovine embryos produced by nuclear transfer from embryonic cells. Cloning, 3:69–82.
23.
IzumiM., VaughanO.A., HutchisonC.J.et al.2000. Head and/or CaaX domain deletions of lamin proteins disrupt preformed lamin A and C but not lamin B structure in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell, 11:4323–4337.
24.
JuS., RuiR., LuQ.et al.2010. Analysis of apoptosis and methyltransferase mRNA expression in porcine cloned embryos cultured in vitro. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 27:49–59.
25.
KankaJ., FulkaJ.Jr., FulkaJ.et al.1991. Nuclear transplantation in bovine embryo: fine structural and autoradiographic studies. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 29:110–116.
26.
KoehlerD., ZakhartchenkoV., FroenickeL.et al.2009. Changes of higher order chromatin arrangements during major genome activation in bovine preimplantation embryos. Exp. Cell. Res., 315:2053–2063.
27.
KraghP.M., NielsenA.L., LiJ.et al.2009. Hemizygous minipigs produced by random gene insertion and handmade cloning express the Alzheimer's disease-causing dominant mutation APPsw. Transgenic Res., 18:545–558.
28.
KuesW.A., CarnwathJ.W., PaulD.et al.2002. Cell cycle synchronization of porcine fetal fibroblasts by serum deprivation initiates a nonconventional form of apoptosis. Cloning Stem Cells, 4:231–243.
29.
LaurincikJ., HyttelP., KopecnyV.1995. DNA synthesis and pronucleus development in pig zygotes obtained in vivo: an autoradiographic and ultrastructural study. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 40:325–332.
30.
LaurincikJ., KopecnyV., HyttelP.1996. Detailed analysis of pronucleus development in bovine zygotes in vivo: ultrastructure and cell cycle chronology. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 43:62–69.
31.
LavoirM.C., KelkD., RumphN.et al.1997. Transcription and translation in bovine nuclear transfer embryos. Biol. Reprod., 57:204–213.
32.
LorthongpanichC., SolterD., LimC.Y.2010. Nuclear reprogramming in zygotes. Int. J. Dev. Biol., 54:1631–1640.
33.
MartinC., BeaujeanN., BrochardV.et al.2006a. Genome restructuring in mouse embryos during reprogramming and early development. Dev. Biol., 292:317–332.
34.
MartinC., BrochardV., MigneC.et al.2006b. Architectural reorganization of the nuclei upon transfer into oocytes accompanies genome reprogramming. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 73:1102–1111.
35.
MattoutA., MeshorerE.2010. Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 22:334–341.
36.
MiyamotoK., NagaiK., KitamuraN.et al.2011. Identification and characterization of an oocyte factor required for development of porcine nuclear transfer embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108:7040–7045.
37.
OgushiS., PalmieriC., FulkaH.et al.2008. The maternal nucleolus is essential for early embryonic development in mammals. Science, 319:613–616.
38.
OrkinS.H., HochedlingerK.2011. Chromatin connections to pluripotency and cellular reprogramming. Cell, 145:835–850.
39.
OstrupO., PetrovicovaI., StrejcekF.et al.2009. Nuclear and nucleolar reprogramming during the first cell cycle in bovine nuclear transfer embryos. Cloning Stem Cells, 11:367–375.
40.
PetersenB., Lucas-HahnA., OropezaM.et al.2008. Development and validation of a highly efficient protocol of porcine somatic cloning using preovulatory embryo transfer in peripubertal gilts. Cloning Stem Cells, 10:355–362.
41.
PichuginA., LeB.D., AdenotP.et al.2010. Dynamics of constitutive heterochromatin: two contrasted kinetics of genome restructuring in early cloned bovine embryos. Reproduction, 139:129–137.
42.
PolioudakiH., KourmouliN., DrosouV.et al.2001. Histones H3/H4 form a tight complex with the inner nuclear membrane protein LBR and heterochromatin protein 1. EMBO Rep., 2:920–925.
43.
SchmidtM., KraghP.M., LiJ.et al.2010. Pregnancies and piglets from large white sow recipients after two transfer methods of cloned and transgenic embryos of different pig breeds. Theriogenology, 74:1233–1240.
44.
SpannT.P., MoirR.D., GoldmanA.E.et al.1997. Disruption of nuclear lamin organization alters the distribution of replication factors and inhibits DNA synthesis. J. Cell. Biol., 136:1201–1212.
45.
SuiL., YangY.2011. Distinct effects of nuclear membrane localization on gene transcription silencing in Drosophila S2 cells and germ cells. J. Genet. Genomics, 38:55–61.
46.
SuzukiM., MisumiK., OzawaM.et al.2006. Successful piglet production by IVF of oocytes matured in vitro using NCSU-37 supplemented with fetal bovine serum. Theriogenology, 65:374–386.
47.
SvarcovaO., LaurincikJ., AveryB.et al.2007. Nucleolar development and allocation of key nucleolar proteins require de novo transcription in bovine embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 74:1428–1435.
48.
SvarcovaO., StrejcekF., PetrovicovaI.et al.2008. The role of RNA polymerase I transcription and embryonic genome activation in nucleolar development in bovine preimplantation embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 75:1095–1103.
49.
SvarcovaO., DinnyesA., PolgarZ.et al.2009. Nucleolar re-activation is delayed in mouse embryos cloned from two different cell lines. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 76:132–141.
50.
SzollosiD., CzolowskaR., SzollosiM.S.et al.1988. Remodeling of mouse thymocyte nuclei depends on the time of their transfer into activated, homologous oocytes. J. Cell Sci., 91,Pt. 4:603–613.
51.
SzollosiM.S., SzollosiD.1988. “Blebbing: of the nuclear envelope of mouse zygotes, early embryos and hybrid cells. J. Cell Sci., 91,Pt. 2:257–267.
52.
ThomasS., LiX.Y., SaboP.J.et al.2011. Dynamic reprogramming of chromatin accessibility during Drosophila embryo development. Genome Biol., 12:R43.
53.
TomanekM., KopecnyV., KankaJ.1989. Genome reactivation in developing early pig embryos: an ultrastructural and autoradiographic analysis. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.), 180:309–316.
54.
VajtaG., BartelsP., JoubertJ.et al.2004. Production of a healthy calf by somatic cell nuclear transfer without micromanipulators and carbon dioxide incubators using the Handmade Cloning (HMC) and the Submarine Incubation System (SIS)Theriogenology, 62:1465–1472.
55.
WangX., XuS., RivoltaC.et al.2002. Barrier to autointegration factor interacts with the cone–rod homeobox and represses its transactivation function. J. Biol. Chem., 277:43288–43300.
56.
WilmutI., SullivanG., TaylorJ.2009. A decade of progress since the birth of Dolly. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 21:95–100.
57.
YamanakaK., SugimuraS., WakaiT.et al.2009. Acetylation level of histone H3 in early embryonic stages affects subsequent development of miniature pig somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. J. Reprod. Dev., 55:638–644.
58.
YamanakaS., BlauH.M.2010. Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature, 465:704–712.
59.
YoshiokaK., SuzukiC., TanakaA.et al.2002. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol. Reprod., 66:112–119.
60.
ZhaoJ., HaoY., RossJ.W.et al.2010a. Histone deacetylase inhibitors improve in vitro and in vivo developmental competence of somatic cell nuclear transfer porcine embryos. Cell Reprogram., 12:75–83.
61.
ZhaoJ., WhyteJ., PratherR.S.2010b. Effect of epigenetic regulation during swine embryogenesis and on cloning by nuclear transfer. Cell Tissue Res., 341:13–21.
62.
ZhouS., DingC., ZhaoX.et al.2010. Successful generation of cloned mice using nuclear transfer from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Res., 20:850–853.
63.
ZhuJ., KingT., DobrinskyJ.et al.2003. In vitro and in vivo developmental competence of ovulated and in vitro matured porcine oocytes activated by electrical activation. Cloning Stem Cells, 5:355–365.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
