In our previous study (Tsuji et al., 2010), administration of hCG to recipients around the timing of implantation significantly increased the in vivo development of mouse embryos after somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) until day 10.5, but did not increase the development to full term. The present study was undertaken to examine whether cotransfer of fertilized embryos or parthenogenetic embryos prevents the embryonic loss of SCNT embryos after day 10.5, allowing them to develop to full term. We found that compared with SCNT embryo transfer alone, full-term development of SCNT embryos slightly, but not significantly, increased by cotransfer of mouse hybrid blastocysts derived from BDF1 (C57BL/6×DBA) female×ICR male into the oviducts of recipients administered hCG (2.0% vs. 5.5%). This was not the case with the cotransfer of blastocysts from an ICR female×ICR male (2.5% vs. 2.2%) or parthenogenetic blastocysts from BDF1 female (3.0% vs. 2.0%). Furthernore, when SCNT blastocysts were transferred into the uteri of recipients, full-term development did not increase even with the cotransfer of hybrid blastocysts. The mechanisms of the effect of cotransfer of fertilized and parthenogenetic embryos on the full-term development of SCNT mouse embryos are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BauersachsS., UlbrichS.E., ZakhartchenkoV.et al.2009. The endometrium responds differently to cloned versus fertilized embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106:5681–5686.
2.
ChaeJ.I., LeeK.S., KimD.J.et al.2009. Abnormal gene expression in extraembryonic tissue from cloned porcine embryos. Theriogenology, 15:323–333.
3.
CibelliJ.B., CampbellK.H., SeidelG.E.et al.2002. The health profile of cloned animals. Nat. Biotechnol., 20:13–14.
4.
De SousaP.A., DobrinskyJ.R., ZhuJ.et al.2002. Somatic cell nuclear transfer in the pig: control of pronuclear formation and integration with improved methods for activation and maintenance of pregnancy. Biol. Reprod., 66:642–650.
5.
ErbachG.T., LawittsJ.A., PapaioannouV.E.et al.1994. Differential growth of the mouse preimplantation embryo in chemically defined media. Biol. Reprod., 50:1027–1033.
6.
ForsythI.A.1994. Comparative aspects of placental lactogens: structure and function. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol., 102:244–251.
7.
FultonB.P., WhittinghamD.G.1978. Activation of mammalian oocytes by intracellular injection of calcium. Nature, 273:149–151.
8.
GalosyS.S., TalamantesF.1995. Luteotropic actions of placental lactogens at midpregnancy in the mouse. Endocrinology, 136:3993–4003.
9.
HeapR.B.1972. Role of hormones in pregnancy. Reproduction in Mammals, Book 3 Hormones in Reproduction. AustinC.R., ShortR.V.Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 73–105.
10.
HeindryckxB., Van der ElstJ., DhontM.2006. Culture medium preferences of pre-implantation cloned mouse embryos. Nuclear Transfer Protocols. VermaP.J., TrounsonA.O.Hummana Press: Clifton, NJ, 59–77.
11.
JoneauA., ZhouQ., CamusA.et al.2006. Developmental abnormalities of NT mouse embryos appear early after implantation. Development, 133:1597–1607.
12.
KatoY., TsunodaY.2010. Role of the donor nuclei in cloning efficiency: can the ooplasm reprogram any nucleus?Int. J. Dev. Biol., 54:1623–1629.
13.
KishigamiS., MizutaniE., OhtaH.et al.2006. Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 340:183–189.
14.
LichtP., RussuV., WildtL.2001. On the role of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the embryo–endometrial microenviroment: implications for differentiation and implantation. Semin. Reprod., 19:37–47.
15.
LinzerD.I., FisherS.J.1999. The placenta and the prolactin family of hormones: regulation of the physiology of pregnancy. Mol. Endcrinol., 13:837–840.
16.
MengQ., WangM., StancaC.A.et al.2008. Cotransfer of parthenogenetic embryos improves the pregnancy and implantation of nuclear transfer embryos in mouse. Cloning Stem Cells, 10:429–434.
17.
MengQ., PolgarZ., LiuJ.et al.2009. Live birth of somatic cell-cloned rabbits following trichostatin A treatment and cotransfer of pathenogenetic embryos. Cloning Stem Cells, 11:203–208.
18.
Mulac-JericevicB., MullinaxR.A., DeMayoF.J.et al.2000. Subgroup of reproductive functions of progesterone mediated by progesterone receptor-B isoform. Science, 289:1751–1754.
19.
OnoR., NakamuraK., InoueK.et al.2006. Deletion of Peg10, an imprinted gene acquired from a retrotransposon, causes early embryonic lethality. Nat. Genet., 38:101–106.
20.
PalmieriC., LoiP., PtakG.et al.2008. Review paper: a review of the pathology of abnormal placentae of somatic cell nuclear transfer clone pregnancies in cattle, sheep, and mice. Vet. Pathol., 45:865–880.
21.
PariaB.C., Huet-HudsonY.M., DeyS.K.1993. Blastocyst's state of activity determines the “window” of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:10159–10162.
22.
PopovaE., BaderM., KrivokharchenkoA.2006. Full-term development of rat after transfer of nuclei from two-cell stage embryos. Biol. Reprod., 75:524–530.
23.
RichaR., LoC.W.1990. Embryo transfer into pregnant mice: an alternative to pseudopregnancy. Lab. Anim. Sci., 40:637–638.
24.
RichardsJ.S.1994. Hormonal control of gene expression in the ovary. Endocr. Rev., 15:725–751.
25.
RulickeT., HaenggliA., RappoldK.et al.2006. No transuterine migration of fertilized ova after unilateral embryo transfer in mice. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 18:885–891.
26.
RybouchkinA., KatoY., TsunodaY.2006. Role of histone acetylation in reprogramming of somatic nuclei following nuclear transfer. Biol. Reprod., 74:1083–1089.
27.
SuraniM.A., BartonS.C., NorrisM.L.1984. Development of gynogenetic eggs in the mouse: imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature, 308:548–550.
28.
TsujiY., KatoY., TsunodaY.2009. The developmental potential of mouse somatic cell nuclear-transferred oocytes treated with trichostatin A and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Zygote, 17:109–115.
29.
TsujiY., KatoY., TsunodaY. 2010. Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin and progesterone administration on the developmental potential of mouse somatic nuclear-transferred oocytes. Cell. Reprogram., 12:183–189.
30.
TsujiY., KatoY., TsunodaY. 2011. Administration of cyclosporine A to recipients improves the potential of mouse somatic cell nuclear transferred oocytes to develop to fetuses. Zygotes Doi: 10.1017/S0967199411000189in press.
31.
TsunodaY., McLarenA.1983. Effect of various procedures on the viability of mouse embryos containing half the normal number of blastomeres. J. Reprod. Fertil., 69:315–322.
32.
TsunodaY., KatoY.1995. Development of enucleated mouse oocytes receiving PDGF or FGF treated male germ cells after activation with electrical stimulation. J. Reprod. Dev., 41:71–75.
33.
WakayamaT., PerryA.C.2002. Cloning of mice. Principles of Cloning. LanzaR., CampbellK.S., WestM.D.Academic Press: New York, 301–341.
34.
WakayamaT., PerryA.C., ZuccotiM.et al.1998. Full term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature, 394:369–374.
35.
WilmutI.2006. Are there any normal clones?Nuclear Transfer Protocols. VermaP.J., TrounsonA.O.Hummana Press: Clifton, NJ, 307–318.
36.
YangX., SmithS.L., TianX.C.et al.2007. Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning. Nat. Genet., 39:295–302.
37.
YinX.J., TaniT., YonemuraI.et al.2002. Production of cloned pigs from adult somatic cells by chemically assisted removal of maternal chromosomes. Biol. Reprod., 67:442–446.
