Nuclear-mitochondrial incompatibilities may be responsible for the development failure reported in embryos and fetuses produced by interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT). Herein we performed xenooplasmic transfer (XOT) by introducing 10 to 15% of buffalo ooplasm into bovine zygotes to assess its effect on the persistence of buffalo mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Blastocyst rates were not compromised by XOT in comparison to both in vitro fertilized embryos and embryos produced by transfer of bovine ooplasm into bovine zygotes. Moreover, offspring were born after transfer of XOT embryos to recipient cows. Buffalo mtDNA introduced in zygotes was still present at the blastocyst stage (8.3 vs. 9.3%, p = 0.11), indicating unaltered heteroplasmy during early development. Nonetheless, no vestige of buffalo mtDNA was found in offspring, indicating a drift to homoplasmy during later stages of development. In conclusion, we show that the buffalo mtDNA introduced by XOT into a bovine zygote do not compromise embryo development. On the other hand, buffalo mtDNA was not inherited by offspring indicating a possible failure in the process of interspecies mtDNA replication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarritJ.A., BrennerC.A., MalterH.E.et al.2001. Mitochondria in human offspring derived from ooplasmic transfer. Hum. Reprod., 16:513–516.
2.
BowlesE.J., TecirliogluR.T., FrenchA.J.et al.2008. Mitochondrial DNA transmission and transcription after somatic cell fusion to one or more cytoplasts. Stem Cells, 26:775–782.
3.
BrennerC.A., BarritJ.A., WilladsenS.et al.2000. Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy after human ooplasmic transplantation. Fertil. Steril., 74:573–578.
4.
ChenD.Y., WenD.C., ZhangY.P.et al.2002. Interspecies implantation and mitochondria fate of panda–rabbit cloned embryos. Biol. Reprod., 67:637–642.
5.
ChiarattiM.R., BressanF.F., FerreiraC.R.et al.2010. Embryo mitochondrial DNA depletion is reversed during early embryogenesis in cattle. Biol. Reprod., 82:76–85.
6.
FerreiraC.R., MeirellesF.V., YamazakiW.et al.2007. The kinetics of donor cell mtDNA in embryonic and somatic donor cell-derived bovine embryos. Cloning Stem Cells, 9:618–629.
7.
FerreiraC.R., BurgstallerJ.P., PerecinF.P.et al.2010. Pronounced segregation of donor mitochondria introduced by bovine ooplasmic transfer to the female germ-line. Biol. Reprod., 82:563–571.
8.
GómezM.C., PopeC.E., RicksD.M.et al.2009. Cloning endangered felids using heterospecific donor oocytes and interspecies embryo transfer. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 21:76–82.
9.
HiendlederS., ZakhartchenkoV., WenigerkindH.et al.2003. Heteroplasmy in bovine fetuses produced by intra- and inter-subspecific somatic cell nuclear transfer: neutral segregation of nuclear donor mitochondrial DNA in various tissues and evidence for recipient cow mitochondria in fetal blood. Biol. Reprod., 68:159–166.
10.
HiendlederS., ZakhartchenkoV., WolfE.2005. Mitochondrial and the success of somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning: from nuclear-mitochondrial interactions to mitochondrial complementation and mitochondrial DNA recombination. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 17:69–83.
11.
HuaS., ZhangY., SongK.et al.2007. Development of bovine–ovine interspecies cloned embryos and mitochondria segregation in blastomeres during preimplantation. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 105:245–257.
12.
KameyamaY., FilionF., YooJ.G.et al.2007. Characterization of mitochondrial replication and transcription control during rat early development in vivo and in vitro. Reproduction, 133:423–432.
13.
KenyonL., MoraesC.T.1997. Expanding the functional human mitochondrial DNA database by the establishment of primate xenomitochondrial cybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94:9131–9135.
14.
KitiyanantY., SaikhunJ., ChaisaleeB.et al.2001. Somatic cell in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): effects of interspecies cytoplasmic recipients and activation procedures. Cloning Stem Cells, 3:97–104.
15.
LanzaR.P., CibelliJ.B., DiazF.et al.2000. Cloning of an endangered species (Bos gaurus) using interspecies nuclear transfer. Cloning, 2:79–90.
16.
LoiP., PtakG., BarboniB.et al.2001. Genetic rescue of an endangered mammal by cross-species nuclear transfer using post-mortem somatic cells. Nat. Biotechnol., 19:962–964.
17.
LuF., Shi, DeshuS.et al.2005. Development of embryos reconstructed by interspecies nuclear transfer of adult fibroblasts between buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and cattle (Bos indicus)Theriogenology, 64:1309–1319.
18.
MacEachernS., McEwanJ., GoddardM.2009. Phylogenetic reconstruction and the identification of ancient polymorphism in the Bovini tribe (Bovidae, Bovinae)BMC Genomics, 10:177.
19.
MastromonacoG.F., FavettaL.A., SmithL.C.et al.2007. The influence of nuclear content on developmental competence of gaur × cattle hybrid in vitro fertilized and somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Biol. Reprod., 76:514–523.
20.
May-PanloupP., VignonX, ChrétienM-F.et al.2005. Increase of mitochondrial DNA content and transcripts in early bovine embryogenesis associated with upregulation of mtTFA and NRF1 transcription factors. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol., 3:65.
21.
McConnellJ.M., PetrieL.2004. Mitochondrial DNA turnover occurs during preimplantation development and can be modulated by environmental factors. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 9:418–424.
22.
MeirellesF.V., BordignonV., WatanabeY.et al.2001. Complete replacement of the mitochondrial genotype in a Bos indicus calf reconstructed by nuclear transfer to a Bos taurus oocytes. Genetics, 158:351–356.
23.
MtangoN.R., HarveyA.J., Lathamet al.2008. Molecular control of mitochondrial function in developing rhesus monkey oocytes and preimplantation-stage embryos. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 20:846–859.
24.
PikóL., TaylorK.D.1987. Amounts of mitochondrial DNA and abundance of some mitochondrial gene transcripts in early mouse embryos. Dev. Biol., 123:364–374.
25.
SaikhunJ., PavasuthipaisitK., JaruansuwanM.et al.2002. Xenonuclear transplantation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fetal and adult somatic cell nuclei into bovine (Bos indicus) oocyte cytoplasm and their subsequent development. Theriogenology, 57:1829–1837.
26.
SmithL.C., ThundathilJ., FilionF.2005. Role of the mitochondrial genome in preimplantation development and assisted reproductive technologies. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 17:15–22.
27.
SpikingsE.C., AldersonJ., St JohnJ.C.2007. Regulated mitochondrial DNA replication during oocyte maturation is essential for successful porcine embryonic development. Biol. Reprod., 76:327–335.
28.
SteinbornR., ZakhartchenkoV., JelyazkovJ.et al.1998. Composition of parental mitochondrial DNA in cloned bovine embryos. FEBS Lett., 426:352–356.
29.
SunQ.Y, WuG.M., LaiL.et al.2001. Translocation of active mitochondria during pig oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development. Reproduction, 122:155–163.
30.
TrounceI.A., PinkertC.A.2007. Cybrid models of mtDNA disease and transmission, from cells to mice. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 77:157–183.
31.
WilmutI., SchniekeA.E., McWhirJ.et al.1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature, 385:810–813.
