To understand the epigenetic alterations associated with assisted reproduction technology (ART) and the reprogramming of gene expression that follows somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), we screened a panel of 41 amplicons representing 25 developmentally important genes on 15 different chromosomes (a total of 1079 CpG sites). Methylation analysis was performed on DNA from pools of 80 blastocysts representing three classes of embryos. This revealed a subset of amplicons that distinguish between embryos developing in vivo, produced in vitro, or reconstructed by SCNT. Following SCNT, we observed massive epigenetic reprogramming evidenced by reduced levels of methylation in the resultant embryos. Analysis of data from the 28 most informative amplicons (hotspot loci), representing more than 523 individual CpG sites, we discovered subsets of amplicons with methylation patterns that were unique to each class of embryo and may indicate metastable epialleles. Analysis of eight genes with respect to mRNA expression did not reveal a direct correlation with DNA methylation levels. In conclusion, this approach revealed a subset of amplicons that can be used to evaluate blastocyst quality and reprogramming following SCNT, and can also be employed for the localization of the epigenetic control regions within individual genes and for more general studies of stem cell differentiation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonD.L.2008. Insights and applications from sequencing the bovine genome. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 20:245–253.
2.
AntequeraF.2003. Structure, function and evolution of CpG island promoters. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 60:1647–1658.
3.
AnywayM.D., CuppA.S., UzumcuM.et al.2005. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science, 308:1466–1469.
4.
BaronU., TürbachovaI., HellwagA.et al.2006. DNA methylation analysis as a tool for cell typing. Epigenomics, 1:55–60.
5.
BeaujeanN., TaylorJ., GardnerJ.et al.2004. Effect of limited DNA methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol. Reprod., 71:185–193.
6.
BestorT.H., TyckoB.1996. Creation of genomic methylation patterns. Nat. Genet., 12:363–367.
7.
BibikovaM., ChudinE., WuB.et al.2006. Human embryonic stem cells have a unique epigenetic signature. Genome Res., 16:1075–1083.
8.
Bourc'hisD., Le BourhisD., PatinD.et al.2001. Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methylation patterns in bovine cloned embryos. Curr. Biol., 11:1542–1546.
9.
BungartzL., NiemannH.1994. Asssessment of the presence of a dominant follicle and selection of dairy cows suitable for superovulation by single ultrasound examination. J. Reprod. Fertil., 101:583–591.
CurchoeC., ZhangS., BinY.et al.2005. Promoter-specific expression of the imprinted IGF2 gene in cattle (Bos taurus)Biol. Reprod., 73:1275–1281.
12.
DeanW., SantosF., StojkovicM.et al.2001. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98:13734–13738.
13.
DeanW., SantosF., ReikW.2003. Epigenetic reprogramming in early mammalian development and following somatic nuclear transfer. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol., 14:93–100.
14.
DeRyckeM., LiebaersI., Van SteirteghemA.2002. Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies. Hum. Reprod., 17:2487–2494.
15.
DindotS.V., FarinP.W., FarinC.et al.2004. Epigenetic and genomic imprinting analysis in nuclear transfer derived Bos gaurus/Bos taurus hybrid fetuses. Biol. Reprod., 71:470–478.
16.
DolinoyD.C., DasR., WeidmannJ.R.et al.2007. Metastable epialleles, imprinting, and the fetal origins of adult diseases. Pediatric Res., 61:30R–37R.
EckertJ., NiemannH.1995. In vitro maturation, fertilization and culture to blastocysts of bovine oocytes in protein-free media. Theriogenology, 43:1211–1225.
19.
EckhardtF., LewinJ., CortesR.et al.2006. DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat. Genet., 38:1378–1385.
20.
EilertsenJ., PowerR.A., HarkinsL.L.et al.2007. Targeting cellular memory to reprogram the epigenome, restore potential, and improve somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 98:129–146.
21.
FarinP.W., PiedrahitaJ.A., FarinE.2006. Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology, 65:178–191.
22.
FloessS., FreyerJ., SiewertC.et al.2007. Epigenetic control of the foxp3 locus in regulatory T-cells. PLoS Biol., 5:169–178.
23.
HajkovaP., AncelinK., WaldmannT.et al.2008. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature, 452:877–882.
24.
HiiragiT., SolterD.2005. Reprogramming is essential in nuclear transfer. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 70:417–421.
25.
HolmT.M., Jackson-GrusbyL., BrambrinkT.et al.2005. Global loss of imprinting leads to widespread tumorigenesis in adult mice. Cancer Cell, 8:275–285.
26.
HurstG.D., WerrenJ.H.2001. The role of selfish genetic elements in eukaryotic evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet., 2:597–606.
JonesP.A.1999. The DNA methylation paradox. Trends Genet., 15:34–37.
29.
JonesP.A., BaylinS.B.2002. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet., 3:415–428.
30.
KangY.K., KooD.B., ParkJ.S.et al.2001a. Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. Nat. Genet., 28:173–177.
31.
KangY.K., KooD.B., ParkJ.S.et al.2001b. Typical demethylation events in cloned pig embryos. Clues on species-specific differences in epigenetic reprogramming of a cloned donor genome. J. Biol. Chem., 276:39980–39984.
KremenskoyM., KremenskaY., OhganeJ.et al.2003. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation status of CpG islands in embryoid bodies, teratomas, and fetuses. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 311:884–890.
34.
LazzariG., WrenzyckiC., HerrmannD.et al.2002. Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biol. Reprod., 67:767–775.
35.
LeeT.J., JennerR.G., BoyerL.A.et al.2006. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell, 125:301–326.
36.
LewinJ., SchmittA.O., AdorjanP.et al.2004. Quantitative DNA methylation analysis based on four dye trace data from direct sequencing of PCR amplificates. Bioinformatics, 20:3005–3012.
37.
LiE., BeardC., JaenischR.1993. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature, 366:362–365.
38.
MayerW., NiveleaA., WalterJ.et al.2000. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature, 403:501–502.
39.
MétivierR., GallaisR., TiffocheC.et al.2008. Cyclical DNA methylation of a transcriptionally active promoter. Nature, 452:45–52.
40.
NiemannH., WrenzyckiC.2000. Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: implications for subsequent development. Theriogenology, 53:21–34.
41.
NiemannH., WrenzyckiC., Lucas-HahnA.et al.2002. Gene expression patterns in bovine in vitro-produced and nuclear transfer-derived embryos and their implications for early development. Cloning Stem Cells, 4:29–38.
42.
OlekA., OswaldJ., WalterJ.1996. A modified and improved method for bisulphite based cytosine methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 24:5064–5066.
43.
OswaldJ., EngemannS., LaneN.et al.2000. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr. Biol., 10:475–478.
44.
PowellK.2003. Seeds of doubt. Nature, 422:656–658.
45.
RapkoS., BaronU., HoffmüllerU.et al.2007. DNA methylation analysis as novel tool for quality control in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng. 10.1089/ten.2006.0444[Epub ahead of print].
46.
ReikW., DeanW., WalterJ.2001. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science, 293:1089–1093.
47.
SantosF., HendrichB., ReikW.et al.2002. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol., 241:172–182.
48.
SaxonovS., BergP., BrutlagD.L.2006. A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103:1412–1417.
49.
SchaetzleinS., Lucas-HahnA., LemmeE.et al.2004. Telomere length is reset during early mammalian embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101:8034–8038.
50.
ShenY., ChowJ., WangZ.et al.2006. Abnormal CpG island methylation occurs during in vitro differentiation oh human embryonic stem cells. Hum. Mol. Genet., 15:2623–2635.
51.
ShiotaK., KogoY., OhganeJ.et al.2002. Epigenetic marks by DNA methylation specific to stem, germ and somatic cells in mice. Genes Cells, 7:961–969.
52.
SimonssonS., GurdonJ.2004. DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Nat. Cell. Biol., 6:984–990.
53.
SkottmanH., StrömbergA.M., MatilainenE.et al.2006. Unique gene expression signature by human embryonic stem cells cultured under serum free conditions correlates with their enhanced and prolonged growth in an undifferentiated stage. Stem Cells, 24:151–167.
54.
SmithS.L., EvertsR.E., TianX.C.et al.2005. Global gene expression profiles reveal significant nuclear reprogramming by the blastocyst stage after cloning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102:17582–17587.
55.
TrounsonA.2006. The production and direct differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Endocr. Rev., 27:208–219.
56.
WaterlandR.A., JirtleR.L.2003. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol. Cell Biol., 23:5293–5300.
57.
WeberM., DaviesJ.J., WittigD.et al.2005. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat. Genet., 37:853–862.
58.
WeberM., HellmannI., StadlerM.B.et al.2007. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat. Genet., 39:457–466.
59.
WrenzyckiC., HerrmannD., KeskintepeL.et al.2001a. Effects of culture system and protein supplementation on mRNA expression in pre-implantation bovine embryos. Hum. Reprod., 16:893–901.
60.
WrenzyckiC., WellsD., HerrmannD.et al.2001b. Nuclear transfer protocol affects messenger RNA expression patterns in cloned bovine blastocysts. Biol. Reprod., 65:309–317.
61.
WrenzyckiC., Lucas-HahnA., HerrmannD.et al.2002. In vitro production and nuclear transfer affect dosage compensation of the X-linked gene transcripts G6PD, PGK, and Xist in preimplantation bovine embryos. Biol. Reprod., 66:127–134.
62.
WrenzyckiC., HerrmannD., Lucas-HahnA.et al.2005. Messenger RNA expression patterns in bovine embryos derived from in vitro procedures and their implications for development. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 17:23–35.
63.
XuY., ZhangJ.J., GrifoJ.A.et al.2005. DNA methylation patterns in human tripronucleate zygotes. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 11:167–171.
64.
YoungL.E., FernandesK., McEvoyet al.2001. Pigenetic change in IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo culture. Nat. Genet., 27:153–154.
65.
ZhangS., KubotaC., YangL.et al.2004. Genomic imprinting of H19 in naturally reproduced and cloned cattle. Biol. Reprod., 71:1540–1544.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
