Abstract
Objective:
This study aimed to predict therapeutic efficacy among diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after R-CHOP (-like) therapy using baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) radiomics.
Methods:
A total of 239 patients with DLBCL were enrolled in this study, with 82 patients having refractory/relapsed disease. The radiomics signatures were developed using a stacking ensemble approach. The efficacy of the radiomics signatures, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI), conventional PET parameters model, and their combinations in assessing refractory/relapse risk were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy and decision curve analysis.
Results:
The stacking model, along with the integrated model that combines stacking with the NCCN-IPI and SDmax (the distance between the two lesions farthest apart, normalized to the patient's body surface area), showed remarkable predictive capabilities with a high area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and significant net benefit of the AUC (NB-AUC). Although no significant differences were observed between the combined and stacking models in terms of the AUC in either the training cohort (AUC: 0.992 vs. 0.985, p = 0.139) or the testing cohort (AUC: 0.768 vs. 0.781, p = 0.668), the integrated model exhibited higher values for sensitivity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and NB-AUC than the stacking model.
Conclusion:
Baseline PET radiomics could predict therapeutic efficacy in DLBCL after R-CHOP (-like) therapy, with improved predictive performance when incorporating clinical features and SDmax.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
