Metabolic Monitoring for Children and Adolescents Prescribed Second-Generation Antipsychotics: A Qualitative Study with Child Psychiatrists

Abstract

Introduction:

Professional guidelines recommend that providers routinely monitor children prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) to reduce the risk of adverse metabolic events associated with the medication. Despite this guidance, many studies show low rates of monitoring compliance. In this study, we interviewed child psychiatrists for their views of possible barriers to monitoring.

Methods:

Semi-structured qualitative interviews, developed according to the Regehr model of influences upon patient–provider decision making, were conducted with child and adolescent psychiatrists in current practice and recruited by convenience and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted through internet video meetings and were recorded. Interview data were analyzed following Framework Analysis qualitative methods.

Results:

We recruited and completed interviews with 17 psychiatrists. Patient-level barriers included travel difficulties, limited family time for health care appointments, patient fear of blood draws, and more. Provider-level barriers included professional judgment versus guideline guidance, perceived family burden, assumption of low-risk, short-term SGA use, and more. Organizational level barriers included lack of organizational mandates or incentives, limited appointment time per patient, lack of care coordination, lack of co-located labs, personnel turnover, and more. Barriers at the social and cultural level include stigma and low health literacy.

Conclusion:

These practicing prescribers provided a wide range of possible barriers to metabolic monitoring in children and adolescents prescribed SGAs. The next step is to explore which may be present in certain settings, and to pilot quality improvement interventions. Addressing barriers can reduce risk of metabolic disorders arising from long-term use of SGAs in children and adolescents.