Abstract
Background:
The present study collected benchmark data on alternative methods for collecting quantity and frequency information about caffeine, alcohol, and caffeine and alcohol combined (CAFF+ALC) use.
Materials and Methods:
Participants were N = 50 college students who completed computer-administered survey (COMPSURVEY) and Timeline Followback (TLFB) interviews in randomized order. COMPSURVEY and TLFB data were compared using t-tests, McNemar's tests, and Spearman's correlations.
Results:
For alcohol, COMPSURVEY underestimated quantity consumed compared to TLFB. Similar patterns were found for caffeine, with every participant having ≥1 COMPSURVEY-TLFB self-report difference and 65.5% having a CAFF+ALC inconsistency. Over half (56%) of participants had ≥1 caffeine misreport, with 46% misclassifying a beverage as containing/not containing caffeine. Moderate to strong relationships were found for caffeine and alcohol quantity and frequency of use, but associations for CAFF+ALC were weak.
Conclusions:
The largest inconsistencies were found for CAFF+ALC use, indicating that more research is needed to identify methods for collecting reliable and valid CAFF+ALC use data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
