Abstract
According to the Institute of Medicine, the local health department workforce is at the hub of the public health emergency preparedness system. A growing body of research has pointed to troubling attitudinal gaps among local health department workers, a vital response cohort, regarding willingness to respond to emergent infectious disease threats, ranging from naturally occurring pandemics to bioterrorism events. A summary of relevant literature on the empirical evidence, ethical norms, and legal standards applicable to the willingness of public health professionals to respond to an infectious disease emergency is presented. Recommendations are proposed for future work to be done to bring the relevant empirical, ethical, and legal considerations together to develop practical guidance for the local response to infectious disease emergencies.
Local health departments are the core of the public health emergency preparedness system. But a growing body of research has pointed to troubling attitudinal gaps among local health department workers regarding willingness to respond to emergent infectious disease threats, ranging from naturally occurring pandemics to bioterrorism events. Here the authors summarize relevant literature on the empirical evidence, ethical norms, and legal standards applicable to the willingness of public health professionals to respond to an infectious disease emergency. Recommendations are proposed for future work to develop practical guidance for the local response to such emergencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
