The influence of the cerebellum in poststroke aphasia recovery is poorly understood. Despite the right cerebellum being identified as a critical region involved in both language and cognitive functions, little is known about functional connections between the cerebellum and bilateral cortical hemispheres following stroke. This study investigated the relationship between chronic poststroke naming deficits and cerebello-cerebral resting-state functional connectivity (FC).
Methods:
Twenty-five cognitively normal participants and 42 participants with chronic poststroke aphasia underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants with aphasia also underwent language assessment. We conducted regions of interest (ROI)-to-ROI analyses to investigate the FC between the right cerebellar Crus I/II (seed ROI; Cereb1r/Cereb2r) and bilateral cortical language regions and compared these results to cognitively normal controls. Single-subject connectivity parameters were extracted and used as independent variables in a stepwise multiple linear regression model associating Boston Naming Test (BNT) score with FC measures.
Results:
FC analyses demonstrated correlations between the right cerebellar Crus I/II and both left and right cortical regions for both cognitively normal controls and stroke participants. Additionally, aphasia severity and lesion load had an effect on the cerebello-cerebral network connectivity in participants with aphasia. In a stepwise multiple linear regression, controlling for aphasia severity, time poststroke and lesion load, FC between the right Cereb2–left Cereb1 (standardized beta [std B]= −0.255, p < 0.004), right Cereb2–right anterior MTG (std B = 0.259, p < 0.004), and the right Cereb2–left anterior STG (std B = −0.208, p < 0.018) were significant predictors of BNT score. The overall model fit was R2 = 0.786 (p = 0.001).
Conclusion:
Functional connections between the right cerebellum and residual bilateral cerebral hemisphere regions may play a role in predicting naming ability in poststroke aphasia.
Impact Statement
The right cerebellum is a critical region involved in both language and cognitive functions. However, the influence of the cerebellum in poststroke aphasia recovery is poorly understood. Functional connectivity (FC) analyses in our study demonstrated positive correlations between the right cerebellar Crus I/II and bilateral cortical language regions in chronic poststroke individuals. Further, FC between the right cerebellum and residual regions in bilateral cerebral hemispheres were significant predictors of Boston Naming Test score, which suggest the potential role in predicting naming ability in poststroke aphasia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertM, SoldanA, GottesmanR, et al.Cognitive changes preceding clinical symptom onset of mild cognitive impairment and relationship to ApoE genotype. Curr Alzheimer Res, 2014; 11(8):773–784; doi: 10.2174/156720501108140910121920
2.
AndersonJL, HuttonC, AshburnerJ, et al.Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series. Neuroimage, 2001; 13(5):903–919; doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0746
3.
AshburnerJ. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage, 2007; 38(1):95–113; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007
BaillieuxH, VandervlietEJ, MantoM, et al.Developmental dyslexia and widespread activation across the cerebellar hemispheres. Brain Lang, 2009; 108(2):122–132; doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.10.001
6.
BalaevV, PetrushevskyA, MartynovaO. Changes in functional connectivity of default mode network with auditory and right frontoparietal networks in poststroke aphasia. Brain Connect, 2016; 6(9):714–723; doi: 10.1089/brain.2016.0419
7.
BaldoJV, ArévaloA, PattersonJP, et al.Grey and white matter correlates of picture naming: evidence from a voxel-based lesion analysis of the Boston Naming Test. Cortex, 2013; 49(3):658–667; doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.03.001
8.
BasilakosA, StarkBC, JohnsonL, et al.Leukoaraiosis is associated with a decline in language abilities in chronic aphasia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2019; 33(9):718–729; doi: 10.1177/1545968319862561
9.
BehzadiY, RestomK, LiauJ, et al.A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage, 2007; 37(1):90–101; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042
10.
BinderJR, DesaiRH, GravesWW, et al.Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex, 2009; 19(12):2767–2796; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055
11.
BoehringerA, MacherK, DukartJ, et al.Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates verbal working memory. Brain Stimul, 2013; 6(4):649–653; doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.10.001
12.
BoesAD, PrasadS, LiuH, et al.Network localization of neurological symptoms from focal brain lesions. Brain, 2015; 138(Pt 10):3061–3075; doi: 10.1093/brain/awv228
13.
BucknerRL, KrienenFM, CastellanosA, et al.The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol, 2011; 106(5):2322–2345; doi: 10.1152/jn.00339.2011
14.
BullierB, CassoudesalleH, VillainM, et al.New factors that affect quality of life in patients with aphasia. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2020; 63(1):33–37; doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.06.015
15.
BullmoreET, SucklingJ, OvermeyerS, et al.Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1999; 18(1):32–42; doi: 10.1109/42.750253
16.
CalhounVD, WagerTD, KrishnanA, et al.The impact of T1 versus EPI spatial normalization templates for fMRI data analyses. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017; 38(11):5331–5342; doi: 10.1002/hbm.23737
17.
CallanDE, TajimaK, CallanAM, et al.Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. Neuroimage, 2003; 19(1):113–124; doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00020-x
CarterAR, ShulmanGL, CorbettaM. Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function? Neuroimage, 2012; 62(4):2271–2280; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.070
20.
ChaiXJ, CastañónAN, OngürD, et al.Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression. Neuroimage, 2012; 59(2):1420–1428; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.048
21.
ChumbleyJ, WorsleyK, FlandinG, et al.Topological FDR for neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 2010; 49(4):3057–3064; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.090
DesikanRS, SégonneF, FischlB, et al.An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage, 2006; 31(3):968–980; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021
24.
EngelAK, FriesP, SingerW. Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2001; 2(10):704–716; doi: 10.1038/35094565
25.
FalconerI, VarkanitsaM, KiranS. Resting-state brain network connectivity is an independent predictor of responsiveness to language therapy in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Cortex, 2024; 173:296–312; doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.11.022
26.
FörsterA, KerlHU, GoerlitzJ, et al.Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in acute isolated thalamic infarction detected by dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI. PLoS One, 2014; 9(2):e88044; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088044
27.
FoxMD, RaichleME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2007; 8(9):700–711; doi: 10.1038/nrn2201
28.
FristonKJ, AshburnerJ, FrithCD, et al.Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp, 1995; 3(3):165–189; doi: 10.1002/HBM.460030303
29.
FristonKJ, WilliamsS, HowardR, et al.Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med, 1996; 35(3):346–355; doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910350312
30.
GaoQ, TaoZ, ChengL, et al.Language lateralization during the Chinese semantic task relates to the contralateral cerebra-cerebellar interactions at rest. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):14056; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14600-9
31.
GoodglassH, KaplanE, WeintraubS. BDAE: The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA; 2001.
32.
GriffisJC, NenertR, AllendorferJB, et al.The canonical semantic network supports residual language function in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017; 38(3):1636–1658; doi: 10.1002/hbm.23476
33.
HabasC, KamdarN, NguyenD, et al.Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks. J Neurosci, 2009; 29(26):8586–8594; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1868-09.2009
34.
HagoortP. Nodes and networks in the neural architecture for language: Broca’s region and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2014; 28:136–141; doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.013
35.
HallquistMN, HwangK, LunaB. The nuisance of nuisance regression: Spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity. Neuroimage, 2013; 82:208–225; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.116
36.
HarveyDY, WeiT, EllmoreTM, et al.Neuropsychological evidence for the functional role of the uncinate fasciculus in semantic control. Neuropsychologia, 2013; 51(5):789–801; doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.028
37.
HeBJ, SnyderAZ, VincentJL, et al.Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron, 2007; 53(6):905–918; doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013
38.
HensonRNA, BuechelC, JosephsO, et al.The slice-timing problem in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 1995; 9(6):125.
39.
HillisAE, BarkerPB, BeauchampNJ, et al.MR perfusion imaging reveals regions of hypoperfusion associated with aphasia and neglect. Neurology, 2000; 55(6):782–788; doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.6.782
40.
HillisAE, BehYY, SebastianR, et al.Predicting recovery in acute poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol, 2018; 83(3):612–622; doi: 10.1002/ana.25184
41.
HillisAE, KleinmanJT, NewhartM, et al.Restoring cerebral blood flow reveals neural regions critical for naming. J Neurosci, 2006; 26(31):8069–8073; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2088-06.2006
42.
HopeTMH, LeffAP, PrejawaS, et al.Right hemisphere structural adaptation and changing language skills years after left hemisphere stroke. Brain, 2017; 140(6):1718–1728; doi: 10.1093/brain/awx086
43.
Hubrich-UngureanuP, KaemmererN, HennFA, et al.Lateralized organization of the cerebellum in a silent verbal fluency task: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Neurosci Lett, 2002; 319(2):91–94; doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02566-6
44.
IorgaM, HigginsJ, CaplanD, et al.Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI. Sci Rep, 2021; 11(1):8419; doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88022-z
45.
KaravasilisE, ChristidiF, VelonakisG, et al.Ipsilateral and contralateral cerebro-cerebellar white matter connections: A diffusion tensor imaging study in healthy adults. J Neuroradiol, 2019; 46(1):52–60; doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2018.07.004
46.
KauhanenML, KorpelainenJT, HiltunenP, et al.Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2000; 10(6):455–461; doi: 10.1159/000016107
47.
Keren‐HappuchE, ChenSH, HoMH, et al.A meta-analysis of cerebellar contributions to higher cognition from PET and fMRI studies. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014; 35(2):593–615; doi: 10.1002/hbm.22194
48.
KerteszA. Western aphasia battery--revised, 2007.
49.
KeserZ, HasanKM, MwangiBI, et al.Diffusion tensor imaging of the human cerebellar pathways and their interplay with cerebral macrostructure. Front Neuroanat, 2015; 9:41; doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00041
50.
KeserZ, MeierEL, StockbridgeMD, et al.Corticocerebellar white matter integrity is related to naming outcome in post-stroke aphasia. Neurobiol Lang (Camb), 2023; 4(3):404–419; doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00107
51.
KeserZ, MeierEL, StockbridgeMD, et al.Thalamic nuclei and thalamocortical pathways after left hemispheric stroke and their association with picture naming. Brain Connect, 2021; 11(7):553–565; doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0831
52.
KiranS. What is the nature of poststroke language recovery and reorganization? ISRN Neurol, 2012; 2012:786872; doi: 10.5402/2012/786872
53.
KlingbeilJ, WawrzyniakM, StockertA, et al.Resting-state functional connectivity: An emerging method for the study of language networks in post-stroke aphasia. Brain Cogn, 2019; 131:22–33; doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.08.005
LaCroixAN, JamesE, RogalskyC. Neural resources supporting language production vs. comprehension in chronic post-stroke aphasia: A meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimates. Front Hum Neurosci, 2021; 15:680933; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.680933
56.
LeinerHC, LeinerAL, DowRS. The human cerebro-cerebellar system: Its computing, cognitive, and language skills. Behav Brain Res, 1991; 44(2):113–128; doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80016-6
57.
LinDD, KleinmanJT, WitykRJ, et al.Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in acute stroke detected by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR perfusion imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009; 30(4):710–715; doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1435
58.
MachnerB, von der GablentzJ, GöttlichM, et al.Behavioral deficits in left hemispatial neglect are related to a reduction of spontaneous neuronal activity in the right superior parietal lobule. Neuropsychologia, 2020; 138:107356; doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107356
59.
MackWJ, FreedDM, WilliamsBW, et al.Boston naming test: Shortened versions for use in Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol, 1992; 47(3):P154–P158; doi: 10.1093/geronj/47.3.p154
60.
MarangoloP, FioriV, CaltagironeC, et al.Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances verb generation but not verb naming in poststroke aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci, 2018; 30(2):188–199; doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01201
61.
MariënP, AckermannH, AdamaszekM, et al.Consensus paper: Language and the cerebellum: An ongoing enigma. Cerebellum, 2014; 13(3):386–410; doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0540-5
62.
MatérneM, StrandbergT, LundqvistLO. Risk markers for not returning to work among patients with acquired brain injury: A population-based register study. J Occup Rehabil, 2019; 29(4):728–739; doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09833-6
63.
MeierEL, BunkerLD, KimH, et al.Resting-State Connectivity in Acute and Subacute Poststroke Aphasia: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Pilot Study. Brain Connect, 2023; 13(8):441–452; doi: 10.1089/brain.2022.0065
64.
NairVA, YoungBM, LaC, et al.Functional connectivity changes in the language network during stroke recovery. Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 2015; 2(2):185–195; doi: 10.1002/acn3.165
65.
NewAB, RobinDA, ParkinsonAL, et al.Altered resting-state network connectivity in stroke patients with and without apraxia of speech. Neuroimage Clin, 2015; 8:429–439; doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.01
66.
NicholasML, BurchK, MitchellJR, et al.Self-perception of physical function contributes to participation in cognitively- and physically-demanding activities after stroke. Front Neurol, 2020; 11:474–474; doi: 10.3389/fneur2020.00474
67.
Nieto-CastanonA. Preparing fMRI data for statistical analysis. In: fMRI Techniques and Protocols. (FilippiM. eds.) Springer; 2022; doi: 10.4855/0/arXiv.2210.13564 In press
68.
Nieto-CastanonA. FMRI minimal preprocessing pipeline. In Handbook of Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods in CONN. Hilbert Press: Boston; 2020; pp. 3–16.
69.
Nieto-CastanonA. Handbook of Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods in CONN. Hilbert Press: Boston; 2020.
70.
O’ReillyJX, BeckmannCF, TomassiniV, et al.Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex, 2010; 20(4):953–965; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp157
71.
OishiK, SoldanA, PettigrewC, et al.BIOCARD Research Team. Dataset of relationship between longitudinal change in cognitive performance and functional connectivity in cognitively normal older individuals. Data Brief, 2022; 42:108302; doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108302
72.
PapathanassiouD, EtardO, MelletE, et al.A common language network for comprehension and production: A contribution to the definition of language epicenters with PET. Neuroimage, 2000; 11(4):347–357; doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0546
73.
ParkCH, ChangWH, OhnSH, et al.Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after stroke. Stroke, 2011; 42(5):1357–1362; doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.596155
74.
PedersenPM, VinterK, OlsenTS. Aphasia after stroke: Type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2004; 17(1):35–43; doi: 10.1159/000073896
75.
PennyWD, FristonKJ, AshburnerJ, et al.Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images. Elsevier; 2011; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-372560-8.X5000-1
76.
PetersenSE, FoxPT, SnyderAZ, et al.Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. Science, 1990; 249(4972):1041–1044; doi: 10.1126/science.2396097
77.
PopePA, MiallRC. Task-specific facilitation of cognition by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the cerebellum. Brain Stimul, 2012; 5(2):84–94; doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.03.006
78.
Postman-CaucheteuxWA, BirnRM, PursleyRH, et al.Single-trial fMRI shows contralesional activity linked to overt naming errors in chronic aphasic patients. J Cogn Neurosci, 2010; 22(6):1299–1318; doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21261
79.
PowerJD, MitraA, LaumannTO, et al.Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage, 2014; 84:320–341; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048
80.
PriceCJ. A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage, 2012; 62(2):816–847; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062
81.
RaichleME, FiezJA, VideenTO, et al.Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cereb Cortex, 1994; 4(1):8–26; doi: 10.1093/cercor/4.1.8
82.
RamageAE, AyturS, BallardKJ. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity between semantic and phonological regions of interest may inform language targets in Aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2020; 63(9):3051–3067; doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00117
83.
RieckerA, AckermannH, WildgruberD, et al.Opposite hemispheric lateralization effects during speaking and singing at motor cortex, insula and cerebellum. Neuroreport, 2000; 11(9):1997–2000; doi: 10.1097/00001756-200006260-00038
84.
RollsET, JoliotM, Tzourio-MazoyerN. Implementation of a new parcellation of the orbitofrontal cortex in the automated anatomical labeling atlas. Neuroimage, 2015; 122:1–5; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.075
85.
RordenC, BonilhaL, FridrikssonJ, et al.Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization. Neuroimage, 2012; 61(4):957–965; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.020
RossoC, ValabregueR, AttalY, et al.Contribution of corticospinal tract and functional connectivity in hand motor impairment after stroke. PLoS One, 2013; 8(9):e73164; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073164
88.
SandbergCW. Hypoconnectivity of resting-state networks in persons with Aphasia compared with healthy age-matched adults. Front Hum Neurosci, 2017; 11:91; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00091
SchulzR, FreyBM, KochP, et al.Cortico-cerebellar structural connectivity is related to residual motor output in chronic stroke. Cereb Cortex, 2017; 27(1):635–645; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv251
91.
SebastianR, KimJH, BrenowitzR, et al.Cerebellar neuromodulation improves naming in post-stroke aphasia. Brain Commun, 2020; 2(2):fcaa179; doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa179
92.
SebastianR, KiranS. Task-modulated neural activation patterns in chronic stroke patients with aphasia. Aphasiol, 2011; 25(8):927–951; doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.557436
93.
SebastianR, LongC, PurcellJJ, et al.Imaging network level language recovery after left PCA stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2016; 34(4):473–489; doi: 10.3233/RNN-150621
SiegelJS, RamseyLE, SnyderAZ, et al.Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016; 113(30):E4367–E4376; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521083113
96.
SiegelJS, SeitzmanBA, RamseyLE, et al.Re-emergence of modular brain networks in stroke recovery. Cortex, 2018; 101:44–59; doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.019
97.
Skipper-KallalLM, LaceyEH, XingS, et al.Right hemisphere remapping of naming functions depends on lesion size and location in poststroke Aphasia. Neural Plast, 2017; 2017:8740353; doi: 10.1155/2017/8740353
98.
SladkyR, FristonKJ, TröstlJ, et al.Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI. Neuroimage, 2011; 58(2):588–594; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.078
99.
StockertA, WawrzyniakM, KlingbeilJ, et al.Dynamics of language reorganization after left temporo-parietal and frontal stroke. Brain, 2020; 143(3):844–861; doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa023
100.
StoodleyCJ, SchmahmannJD. Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing. Cortex, 2010; 46(7):831–844; doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.008
101.
StoodleyCJ, SchmahmannJD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage, 2009; 44(2):489–501; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039
102.
StoodleyCJ, ValeraEM, SchmahmannJD. Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 2012; 59(2):1560–1570; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.065
103.
TurkeltaubPE, MessingS, NoriseC, et al.Are networks for residual language function and recovery consistent across aphasic patients? Neurology, 2011; 76(20):1726–1734; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821a44c1
104.
TurkeltaubPE, SwearsMK, D’MelloAM, et al.Cerebellar tDCS as a novel treatment for aphasia? Evidence from behavioral and resting-state functional connectivity data in healthy adults. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2016; 34(4):491–505; doi: 10.3233/RNN-150633
105.
Van DunK, MariënP. Chapter 6 - Cerebellar-induced aphasia and related language disorders. In: The Linguistic Cerebellum. (MariënP, MantoM. eds.) Academic Press: Cambridge, MA; 2015; pp. 107–133.
106.
VárkutiB, GuanC, PanY, et al.Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for BCI and robot-assisted upper-extremity training after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2013; 27(1):53–62; doi: 10.1177/1545968312445910
107.
VigneauM, BeaucousinV, HervéPY, et al.Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage, 2006; 30(4):1414–1432; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002
108.
VigneauM, BeaucousinV, HervéPY, et al.What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 2011; 54(1):577–593; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.036
109.
WangL, YuC, ChenH, et al.Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain, 2010; 133(Pt 4):1224–1238; doi: 10.1093/brain/awq043
110.
WawrzyniakM, SchneiderHR, KlingbeilJ, et al.Resolution of diaschisis contributes to early recovery from post-stroke aphasia. Neuroimage, 2022; 251:119001; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119001
111.
Whitfield-GabrieliS, Nieto-CastanonA. Conn: A functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect, 2012; 2(3):125–141; doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0073
112.
Whitfield-GabrieliS, Nieto-CastanonA, GhoshS. Artifact detection tools (ART). Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cambridge, MA, 2011. Release Version, 7(19), 11.
113.
WilsonSM, SchneckSM. Neuroplasticity in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of reorganization of language processing. Neurobiol Lang (Camb), 2021; 2(1):22–82; doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00025
114.
WrightA, TippettD, SaxenaS, et al.Leukoaraiosis is independently associated with naming outcome in poststroke aphasia. Neurol, 2018; 91(6):e526–e532; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005945
115.
XingS, LaceyEH, Skipper-KallalLM, et al.Right hemisphere grey matter structure and language outcomes in chronic left hemisphere stroke. Brain, 2016; 139(Pt 1):227–241; doi: 10.1093/brain/awv323
116.
YangH, BaiL, ZhouY, et al.Increased inter-hemispheric resting-state functional connectivity in acute lacunar stroke patients with aphasia. Exp Brain Res, 2017; 235(3):941–948; doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4851-x
117.
ZhaoY, Lambon RalphMA, HalaiAD. Relating resting-state hemodynamic changes to the variable language profiles in post-stroke aphasia. Neuroimage Clin, 2018; 20:611–619; doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.08.022
118.
ZhuD, ChangJ, FreemanS, et al.Changes of functional connectivity in the left frontoparietal network following aphasic stroke. Front Behav Neurosci, 2014; 8:167; doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00167
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
