Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-02
Association Between Responsiveness to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity of Sensorimotor Cortex in Older Adults
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising therapeutic technique, and is believed to accomplish its effect by influencing the stimulated and remotely connected areas. However, responsiveness to rTMS shows high interindividual variability, and this intersubject variability is particularly high in older adults. It remains unclear whether baseline resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) contributes to this variability in older adults. The aims of this study are to (1) examine rTMS effects over the primary motor cortex (M1) in older adults, and (2) identify baseline network properties that may contribute to the interindividual variability.
Methods:
We tested response to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), an effective rTMS protocol, over M1 by using both electromyography and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in older adults. Outcome measures included motor-evoked potential (MEP) elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and rsFC before and after an iTBS session.
Results:
iTBS significantly increased MEP amplitudes and rsFC between the stimulation site, sensorimotor cortex, and supplementary motor area (SMA) in older adults. iTBS-induced changes in MEP amplitude were positively correlated with increases in interhemispheric rsFC after iTBS. Furthermore, older adults with lower baseline interhemispheric rsFC between sensorimotor cortex and SMA exhibited stronger MEP response after iTBS.
Discussion:
Findings of the study suggest that different levels of interhemispheric communication during resting state might contribute to the response heterogeneity to iTBS in older adults. Interhemispheric rsFC may have great potential serving as a useful marker for predicting iTBS responsiveness in older adults. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: 1707654427
Impact statement
Factors contributing to interindividual variability of the responsive to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in older adults remain poorly understood. In this study, we examined the effects of rTMS over the primary motor cortex in older adults, and found that response to rTMS is associated with prestimulation interhemispheric connectivity in the sensorimotor and premotor areas. Findings of the study have great potential to be translated into a connectivity-based strategy for identification of responders for rTMS in older adults.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckerleySJ, ByblowWD, BarberPA, et al.2016. Primed physical therapy enhances recovery of upper limb function in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 304:339–348.
2.
BarkhofF, HallerS, RomboutsSARB. 2014. Resting-state functional MR imaging: a new window to the brain. Radiology, 2721:29–49.
3.
BernardJA, SeidlerRD. 2012. Evidence for motor cortex dedifferentiation in older adults. Neurobiol Aging, 339:1890–1899.
4.
BeuzonG, TimourQ, SaoudM. 2017. Predictors of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation rTMS in the treatment of major depressive disorder. L'Encéphale, 431:3–9.
5.
BhandariA, RadhuN, FarzanF, et al.2016. A meta-analysis of the effects of aging on motor cortex neurophysiology assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol, 1278:2834–2845.
6.
BloomJS, HyndGW. 2005. The role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric transfer of information: excitation or inhibition?. Neuropsychol Rev, 152:59–71.
7.
CabezaR. 2002. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging, 171:85–100.
8.
Cárdenas-MoralesL, VolzLJ, MichelyJ, et al.2014. Network connectivity and individual responses to brain stimulation in the human motor system. Cereb Cortex, 247:1697–1707.
9.
CheeranB, TalelliP, MoriF, et al.2008. A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene BDNF modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS. J Physiol, 586:5717–5725.
10.
ChouY hui, YouH, WangH, et al.2015. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on fMRI resting-state connectivity in multiple system atrophy. Brain Connect, 57:451–459.
11.
CrossonB, McGregorKM, NoceraJR, et al.2015. The relevance of aging-related changes in brain function to rehabilitation in aging-related disease. Front Hum Neurosci, 9:307.
12.
DengZD, LisanbySH, PeterchevAV. 2013. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. Brain Stimulat, 61:1–13.
13.
DenslowS, LomarevM, GeorgeMS, et al.2005. Cortical and subcortical brain effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced movement: an interleaved TMS/functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry, 57:752–760.
14.
DevanneH, LavoieBA, CapadayC. 1997. Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res, 1142:329–338.
15.
DunlopK, WoodsideB, OlmstedM, et al.2016. Reductions in cortico-striatal hyperconnectivity accompany successful treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder with dorsomedial prefrontal rTMS. Neuropsychopharmacology, 415:1395–1403.
16.
FigeeM, LuigjesJ, SmoldersR, et al.2013. Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Neurosci, 164:386–387.
17.
FuglevandAJ, ZackowskiKM, HueyKA, et al.1993. Impairment of neuromuscular propagation during human fatiguing contractions at submaximal forces. J Physiol, 460:549–572.
18.
GersnerR, KravetzE, FeilJ, et al.2011. Long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on markers for neuroplasticity: differential outcomes in anesthetized and awake animals. J Neurosci, 3120:7521–7526.
19.
GoddeB, BerkefeldT, David-JürgensM, et al.2002. Age-related changes in primary somatosensory cortex of rats: evidence for parallel degenerative and plastic-adaptive processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 267:743–752.
20.
GohJOS. 2011. Functional dedifferentiation and altered connectivity in older adults: neural accounts of cognitive aging. Aging Dis, 21:30–48.
21.
GoldsworthyMR, Müller-DahlhausF, RiddingMC, et al.2014. Inter-subject variability of LTD-like plasticity in human motor cortex: a matter of preceding motor activation. Brain Stimulat, 7:864–870.
22.
GoldsworthyMR, Müller-DahlhausF, RiddingMC, et al.2015. Resistant against de-depression: LTD-like plasticity in the human motor cortex induced by spaced cTBS. Cereb Cortex, 25:1724–1734.
23.
GoldsworthyMR, PitcherJB, RiddingMC. 2012. The application of spaced theta burst protocols induces long-lasting neuroplastic changes in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci, 35:125–134.
24.
GuerraA, López-AlonsoV, CheeranB, et al.2020. Variability in non-invasive brain stimulation studies: reasons and results. Neurosci Lett, 719:133330.
25.
HamadaM, MuraseN, HasanA, et al.2013. The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex, 237:1593–1605.
26.
HinderMR, GossEL, FujiyamaH, et al.2014. Inter- and intra-individual variability following intermittent theta burst stimulation: implications for rehabilitation and recovery. Brain Stimul Basic Transl Clin Res Neuromodulation, 73:365–371.
27.
HoogendamJM, RamakersGMJ, LazzaroVD. 2010. Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimul Basic Transl Clin Res Neuromodulation, 32:95–118.
28.
HordacreB, GoldsworthyMR, VallenceAM, et al.2017. Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex: a brain stimulation study. Brain Stimul Basic Transl Clin Res Neuromodulation, 103:588–595.
29.
HuangYZ, EdwardsMJ, RounisE, et al.2005. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron, 452:201–206.
30.
HuangYZ, RothwellJC, EdwardsMJ, et al.2008. Effect of physiological activity on an NMDA-dependent form of cortical plasticity in human. Cereb Cortex, 18:563–570.
31.
JenkinsonM, BeckmannCF, BehrensTEJ, et al.2012. FSL. Neuroimage, 622:782–790.
32.
JockwitzC, CaspersS. 2021. Resting-state networks in the course of aging—differential insights from studies across the lifespan vs. amongst the old. Pflüg Arch Eur J Physiol, 4735:793–803.
33.
JungJ, BungertA, BowtellR, et al.2020. Modulating brain networks with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex: a concurrent TMS/fMRI study. Front Hum Neurosci, 14:31.
34.
KallenbergLAC, SchulteE, Disselhorst-KlugC, et al.2007. Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue at low contraction levels in subjects with and without chronic pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 17:264–274.
35.
LanganJ, PeltierSJ, BoJ, et al.2010. Functional implications of age differences in motor system connectivity. Front Syst Neurosci, 4:17.
36.
LeeJ, ParkE, LeeA, et al.2018. Modulating brain connectivity by simultaneous dual-mode stimulation over bilateral primary motor cortices in subacute stroke patients. Neural Plast, 2018:e1458061.
37.
LoganJM, SandersAL, SnyderAZ, et al.2002. Under-recruitment and nonselective recruitment: dissociable neural mechanisms associated with aging. Neuron, 335:827–840.
38.
MaddenDJ, GottlobLR, AllenPA. 1999. Adult age differences in visual search accuracy: attentional guidance and target detectability. Psychol Aging, 144:683–694.
39.
McGregorKM, ZlatarZ, KleimE, et al.2011. Physical activity and neural correlates of aging: a combined TMS/fMRI study. Behav Brain Res, 2221:158–168.
40.
MinYS, ParkJW, JinSU, et al.2016. Neuromodulatory effects of offline low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Sci Rep, 6:36058.
41.
MinkovaL, PeterJ, AbdulkadirA, et al.2019. Determinants of inter-individual variability in corticomotor excitability induced by paired associative stimulation. Front Neurosci, 13:841.
42.
MoisaM, PohmannR, EwaldL, et al.2009. New coil positioning method for interleaved transcranial magnetic stimulation TMS/functional MRI fMRI and its validation in a motor cortex study. J Magn Reson Imaging, 291:189–197.
43.
NaitoE, RolandPE, EhrssonHH. 2002. I feel my hand moving: a new role of the primary motor cortex in somatic perception of limb movement. Neuron, 36:979–988.
44.
NettekovenC, VolzLJ, LeimbachM, et al.2015. Inter-individual variability in cortical excitability and motor network connectivity following multiple blocks of rTMS. Neuroimage, 118:209–218.
45.
PeinemannA, LehnerC, ConradB, et al.2001. Age-related decrease in paired-pulse intracortical inhibition in the human primary motor cortex. Neurosci Lett, 3131:33–36.
46.
PellGS, RothY, ZangenA. 2011. Modulation of cortical excitability induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: influence of timing and geometrical parameters and underlying mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol, 931:59–98.
47.
RieckerA, GröschelK, AckermannH, et al.2006. Functional significance of age-related differences in motor activation patterns. Neuroimage, 323:1345–1354.
48.
RolandJL, SnyderAZ, HackerCD, et al.2017. On the role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric functional connectivity in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 11450:13278–13283.
49.
RolandPE, O'SullivanB, KawashimaR. 1998. Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95:3295–3300.
50.
RosenA, StephensJ, GloverG, et al.2013. P 198. Relationship between functional connectivity and interhemispheric inhibition in older adults. Clin Neurophysiol, 12410:e158–e159.
51.
RossiniPM, BurkeD, ChenR, et al.2015. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol, 1266:1071–1107.
52.
Sala-LlonchR, Bartrés-FazD, JunquéC. 2015. Reorganization of brain networks in aging: a review of functional connectivity studies. Front Psychol, 6:663.
53.
SalomonsTV, DunlopK, KennedySH, et al.2014. Resting-state cortico-thalamic-striatal connectivity predicts response to dorsomedial prefrontal rTMS in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology, 392:488–498.
54.
TangX, HuangP, LiY, et al.2019. Age-related changes in the plasticity of neural networks assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation with electromyography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cell Neurosci, 13:469.
55.
TecchioF, ZappasodiF, PasqualettiP, et al.2008. Age dependence of primary motor cortex plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol, 1193:675–682.
56.
TikM, HoffmannA, SladkyR, et al.2017. Towards understanding rTMS mechanism of action: stimulation of the DLPFC causes network-specific increase in functional connectivity. Neuroimage, 162:289–296.
57.
ToddG, KimberTE, RiddingMC, et al.2010. Reduced motor cortex plasticity following inhibitory rTMS in older adults. Clin Neurophysiol, 1213:441–447.
58.
Tzourio-MazoyerN, LandeauB, PapathanassiouD, et al.2002. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 151:273–289.
59.
UenoS, TashiroT, HaradaK. 1988. Localized stimulation of neural tissues in the brain by means of a paired configuration of time-varying magnetic fields. J Appl Phys, 6410:5862–5864.
60.
VoineskosAN, FarzanF, BarrMS, et al.2010. The role of the corpus callosum in transcranial magnetic stimulation induced interhemispheric signal propagation. Biol Psychiatry, 689:825–831.
61.
VolzLJ, BenaliA, MixA, et al.2013. Dose-dependence of changes in cortical protein expression induced with repeated transcranial magnetic theta-burst stimulation in the rat. Brain Stimul Basic Transl Clin Res Neuromodulation, 64:598–606.
62.
VolzLJ, HamadaM, RothwellJC, et al.2015. What makes the muscle twitch: motor system connectivity and TMS-induced activity. Cereb Cortex, 259:2346–2353.
63.
WatanabeT, HanajimaR, ShirotaY, et al.2013. Bidirectional effects on interhemispheric resting-state functional connectivity induced by excitatory and inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp, 355:1896–1905.
64.
WeintraubS, BesserL, DodgeHH, et al.2018. Version 3 of the Alzheimer Disease Centers' Neuropsychological Test Battery in the Uniform Data Set UDS. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 321:10–17.
65.
Whitfield-GabrieliS, Nieto-CastanonA. 2012. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect, 23:125–141.
66.
WischnewskiM, SchutterDJLG. 2015. Efficacy and time course of theta burst stimulation in healthy humans. Brain Stimulat, 84:685–692.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
