Working memory (WM) and its blood-oxygen-level-dependent-related parametric modulation under load decrease with age. Functional connectivity (FC) generally increases with WM load; however, how aging impacts connectivity and whether this is load-dependent, region-dependent, or associated with cognitive performance is unclear.
Methods:
This study examines these questions in 170 healthy adults (meanage = 52.99 ± 19.18) who completed functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning during an n-back task (0-, 2-, 3-, and 4-back). The FC was estimated by utilizing a modified generalized psychophysiological interaction approach with seeds from fronto-parietal (FP) and default mode (DM) regions that modulated to n-back difficulty. The FC analyses focused on both connectivity during WM engagement (task vs. control) and connectivity in response to increased WM load (linear slope across conditions). Each analysis utilized within- and between-region FC, predicted by age (linear or quadratic), and its associations with in- and out-of-scanner task performance.
Results:
Engaging in WM either generally (task vs. control) or as a function of difficulty strengthened integration within- and between-FP and DM regions. Notably, these task-sensitive functional connections were robust to the effects of age. Stronger negative FC between FP and DM regions was also associated with better WM performance in an age-dependent manner, occurring selectively in middle-aged and older adults.
Discussion:
These results suggest that FC is critical for engaging in cognitively demanding tasks, and its lack of sensitivity to healthy aging may provide a means to maintain cognition across the adult lifespan. Thus, this study highlights the contribution of maintenance in brain function to support working memory processing with aging.
Impact statement
The literature examining functional connectivity (FC) during working memory (WM) in healthy adults is mixed in both age effects and its relationship to performance. This study contributes to the literature by examining a large, adult lifespan sample, increased levels of WM load, and additional investigation of connections within and between fronto-parietal and default mode regions. Results revealed age-invariant strengthened FC during WM, suggesting that healthy aging may be resilient to FC changes. In addition, negative FC between regions was associated with better WM performance in middle-aged and older adults, highlighting the importance of FC maintenance to support successful WM ability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArtusoC, CavalliniE, BottiroliS, PalladinoP. 2017. Updating working memory: memory load matters with aging. Aging Clin Exp Res, 29:371–377.
2.
BaddeleyA.2000. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?. Trends Cogn Sci, 4:417–423.
3.
BaddeleyAD, HitchG. 1974. Working memory. Psychol Learn Motiv, 8:47–89.
4.
BennettIJ, MaddenDJ. 2014. Disconnected aging: cerebral white matter integrity and age-related differences in cognition. Neuroscience, 276:187–205.
5.
CabezaR, AlbertM, BellevilleS, CraikFIM, DuarteA, GradyCL, et al.2018. Maintenance, reserve and compensation: the cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci, 19:701–710.
6.
CaoM, WangJH, DaiZJ, CaoXY, JiangLL, FanFM, et al.2014. Topological organization of the human brain functional connectome across the lifespan. Dev Cogn Neurosci, 7:76–93.
7.
ChenG. 2015. AFNI: context-dependent correlation analysis or generalizedPPI. http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/sscc/gangc/CD-CorrAna.html Last accessed May01, 2018.
8.
CislerJM, BushK, SteeleJS. 2014. A comparison of statistical methods for detecting context-modulated functional connectivity in fMRI. NeuroImage, 84:1042–1052.
9.
CoxRW.1996. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res Int J, 29:162–173.
10.
DerringerJ. 2018. A simple correction for non-independent tests. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f2tyw Last accessed April16, 2018.
11.
DiX, BiswalBB. 2018. Toward task connectomics: examining whole-brain task modulated connectivity in different task domains. Cereb Cortex, 29:1572–1583.
12.
DiX, ReynoldsRC, BiswalBB. 2017. Imperfect (de)convolution may introduce spurious psychophysiological interactions and how to avoid it. Human Brain Mapp, 38:1723–1740.
13.
DiX, ZhangZ, BiswalBB. 2018. Psychophysiological interaction and beta series correlation for task modulated connectivity: modeling considerations and their relationships, bioRxiv:1–29.
14.
DobbsAR, RuleBG. 1989. Adult age differences in working memory. Psychol Aging, 4:500–503.
15.
DoucetGE, LeeWH, FrangouS. 2019. Evaluation of the spatial variability in the major resting-state networks across human brain functional atlases. Human Brain Mapp, 40:4577–4587.
16.
DumasJ, NielsenC, HartmanM. 2001. Age differences in updating working memory: evidence from the delayed-matching-to-sample test. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, 8:14–35.
17.
FolsteinMF, FolsteinSE, McHughPR. 1975. “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res, 12:189–198.
18.
FosterCM, PicklesimerME, MulliganNW, GiovanelloKS. 2016. The effect of age on relational encoding as revealed by hippocampal functional connectivity. Neurobiol Learn Memory, 134:5–14.
19.
FristonKJ.2011. Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect, 1:13–36.
20.
FristonKJ, BuechelC, FinkGR, MorrisJ, RollsE, DolanRJ. 1997. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 6:218–229.
GradyC.2012. The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci, 13:491–505.
23.
HakunJG, ZhuZ, JohnsonNF, GoldBT. 2015. Evidence for reduced efficiency and successful compensation in older adults during task switching. Cortex, 64:352–362.
24.
HeinzelS, LorenzRC, BrockhausW.-R., WüstenbergT, KathmannN, HeinzA, RappMA.2014. Working memory load-dependent brain response predicts behavioral training gains in older adults. J Neurosci, 34:1224–1233.
25.
HeinzelS, LorenzRC, DuongQ-L, RappMA, DesernoL. 2017. Prefrontal-parietal effective connectivity during working memory in older adults. Neurobiol Aging, 57:18–27.
26.
HoneyGD, FuCHY, KimJ, BrammerMJ, CroudaceTJ, SucklingJ, et al.2002. Effects of verbal working memory load on corticocortical connectivity modeled by path analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. NeuroImage, 17:573–582.
27.
KaufmanD, SweetR. 1974. Contrast coding in least squares regression analysis. Am Educ Res J, 11:359–377.
28.
KennedyKM, BoylanMA, RieckJR, FosterCM, RodrigueKM. 2017. Dynamic range in BOLD modulation: lifespan aging trajectories and association with performance. Neurobiol Aging, 60:153–163.
29.
KennedyKM, RazN. 2015. Normal Aging of the Brain. In: Toga, AW (ed.) Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic, vol. 3. Academic Press, NY: Elsevier; p. 603–617.
30.
KingDR, de ChastelaineM, RuggMD. 2018. Recollection-related increases in functional connectivity across the healthy adult lifespan. Neurobiol Aging, 62:1–19.
31.
LewisEL, MouwJT. 1972. The use of contrast coding to simply ANOVA and ANCOVA procedures in multiple linear regression. In: Meeting of the American Educational Research. Association.
32.
LiX, LiangY, ChenY, ZhangJ, WeiD, ChenK, et al.2015. Disrupted frontoparietal network mediates white matter structure dysfunction associated with cognitive decline in hypertension patients. J Neurosci, 35:10015–10024.
33.
LindsayDS.2015. Replication in psychological science. Psychol Sci, 26:1827–1832.
34.
LiuH, YangY, XiaY, ZhuW, LeakRK, WeiZ, WangJ, HuX. 2017. Aging of cerebral white matter. Ageing Res Rev, 34:64–76.
35.
MazaikaPK, WhitfieldS, CooperJC. 2005. Detection and repair of transient artifacts in fMRI data. Neuroimage, 26:S36.
36.
McLarenDG, RiesML, XuG, JohnsonSC. 2012. A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches. NeuroImage, 61:1277–1286.
37.
MeuselLAC, KansalN, TchistiakovaE, YuenW, MacIntoshBJ, GreenwoodCE, AndersonND. 2014. A systematic review of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension in imaging studies of cognitive aging: time to establish new norms. Front Aging Neurosci, 6:1–17.
38.
NagelIE, PreuschhofC, LiS-C, NybergL, BäckmanL, LindenbergerU, HeekerenHR. 2011. Load modulation of BOLD response and connectivity predicts working memory performance in younger and older adults. J Cogn Neurosci, 23:2030–2045.
39.
NewtonAT, MorganVL, RogersBP, GoreJC. 2011. Modulation of steady state functional connectivity in the default mode and working memory networks by cognitive load. Human Brain Mapp, 32:1649–1659.
40.
NgKK, LoJC, LimJKW, CheeMWL, ZhouJ. 2016. Reduced functional segregation between the default mode network and the executive control network in healthy older adults: a longitudinal study. NeuroImage, 133:321–330.
41.
OhH, JagustWJ. 2013. Frontotemporal network connectivity during memory encoding is increased with aging and disrupted by beta-amyloid. J Neurosci, 33:18425–18437.
42.
OwenAM, McMillanKM, LairdAR, BullmoreE. 2005. N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapp, 25:46–59.
43.
ParkDC, LautenschlagerG, HeddenT, DavidsonNS, SmithAD, SmithPK. 2002. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging, 17:299–320.
44.
PeirceJW.2007. PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods, 162:8–13.
45.
PeirceJW.2009. Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Front Neuroinform, 2:1–8.
46.
PreacherKJ, CurranPJ, BauerDJ. 2006. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J Educ Behav Stat, 31:437–448.
47.
R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
48.
RadloffLS.1977. A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas, 1:385–401.
49.
RieckJR, RodrigueKM, BoylanMA, KennedyKM. 2017. Age-related reduction of BOLD modulation to cognitive difficulty predicts poorer task accuracy and poorer fluid reasoning ability. NeuroImage, 147:262–271.
50.
RosenthalR.1979. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull, 86:638–641.
51.
RottschyC, LangnerR, DoganI, ReetzK, LairdAR, SchulzJB, et al.2012. Modelling neural correlates of working memory: a coordinate-based meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 60:830–846.
52.
RStudio Team. 2018. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. R for Beginners. Boston, MA: RStudio. Team.
53.
Sala-LlonchR, Peña-GómezC, Arenaza-UrquijoEM, Vidal-PiñeiroD, BargallóN, JunquéC, Bartrés-FazD. 2012. Brain connectivity during resting state and subsequent working memory task predicts behavioural performance. Cortex, 48:1187–1196.
54.
Schneider-GarcesNJ, GordonBA, Brumback-PeltzCR, ShinE, LeeY, SuttonBP, et al.2010. Span, CRUNCH, and beyond: working memory capacity and the aging brain. J Cogn Neurosci, 22:655–669.
55.
ShineJM, BissettPG, BellPT, KoyejoO, BalstersJH, GorgolewskiKJ, et al.2016. The dynamics of functional brain networks: integrated network states during cognitive task performance. Neuron, 92:544–554.
56.
ShirerWR, RyaliS, RykhlevskaiaE, MenonV, GreiciusMD. 2012. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cerebral Cortex, 22:158–165.
57.
SmithDV, GseirM, SpeerME, DelgadoMR. 2016. Toward a cumulative science of functional integration: a meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions. Human Brain Mapp, 37:2904–2917.
58.
St. JacquesPL, RubinDC, CabezaR. 2012. Age-related effects on the neural correlates of autobiographical memory retrieval. Neurobiol Aging, 33:1298–1310.
59.
SwansonHL.1999. What develops in working memory? A life span perspective. Dev Psychol 35,986–1000.
60.
TrelleAN, HensonRN, SimonsJS. 2019. Neural evidence for age-related differences in representational quality and strategic retrieval processes. Neurobiol Aging, 84:50–60.
61.
TsukiuraT, SekiguchiA, YomogidaY, NakagawaS, ShigemuneY, KambaraT, et al.2011. Effects of aging on hippocampal and anterior temporal activations during successful retrieval of memory for face-name associations. J Cogn Neurosci, 23:200–213.
62.
TurnerGR, SprengRN. 2015. Prefrontal engagement and reduced default network suppression co-occur and are dynamically coupled in older adults: the default–executive coupling hypothesis of aging. J Cogn Neurosci, 27:2462–2476.
63.
WagerTD, SmithEE. 2003. Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 3:255–274.
64.
WangZ, WangJ, ZhangH, MchughR, SunX, LiK, YangQX. 2015. Interhemispheric functional and structural disconnection in Alzheimer s disease: A combined resting-state fMRI and DTI study. PLoS ONE, 10:1–16.
WeeCY, YapPT, ZhangD, DennyK, BrowndykeJN, PotterGG, Welsh-BohmerKA, WangL, ShenD. 2012. Identification of MCI individuals using structural and functional connectivity networks. NeuroImage, 59:2045–2056.
67.
WickhamH.2016. ggplot2 Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New, York: Springer-Verlag New York.
68.
YangSQ, XuZP, XiongY, ZhanYF, GuoLY, ZhangS, et al.2016. Altered intranetwork and internetwork functional connectivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without cognitive impairment. Sci Rep, 6:1–11.
69.
YarkoniT, PoldrackRA, NicholsTE, EssenDC. Van WagerTD. 2011. NeuroSynth: a new platform for large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Front Neuroinform 5; DOI: 10.3389/conf.fninf.2011.08.00058.
70.
YeoBTT, KrienenFM, SepulcreJ, SabuncuMR, LashkariD, HollinsheadM, et al.2011. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol, 106:1125–1165.
71.
ZhangY, LuS, LiuC, ZhangH, ZhouX, NiC, et al.2016. Altered brain activation and functional connectivity in working memory related networks in patients with type 2 diabetes: an ICA-based analysis. Sci Rep, 6:1–11.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
