Psychometric intelligence is closely related to working memory (WM) and the associated brain activity. We aimed to clarify the associations between psychometric intelligence and WM-induced functional connectivity changes.
Materials and Methods:
Here we determined the associations between psychometric intelligence measured by nonverbal reasoning (using the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices) and WM-induced changes in functional connectivity during the N-back paradigm, in a large cohort of 1221 young adults.
Results:
We observed that the measures of general intelligence showed a significant positive correlation with WM-induced changes in the functional connectivity with the key nodes of the frontoparietal network, such as the bilateral premotor cortices and the presupplementary motor area. Those significant correlations were observed for (1) areas showing a WM-induced increase of the functional connectivity with the abovementioned key nodes, such as the lateral parietal cortex; (2) areas showing a WM-induced decrease of the functional connectivity with the abovementioned key nodes (2-a) such as left perisylvian areas and cuneus, the fusiform gyrus, and the lingual gyrus, which play key roles in language processing, (2-b) hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus, which play key roles in memory processing, and (2-c) the key node of the default mode network such as the medial prefrontal cortex; as well as (3) the border areas between (1) and (2).
Conclusion:
Psychometric intelligence is associated with WM-induced changes in functional connectivity, influencing the way in which WM key nodes dynamically modulate the interaction with other brain nodes in response to WM.
Impact statement
Psychophysiological interaction analysis is an old, widely used method to detect functional connectivity changes between different areas in response to task conditions. However, the associations of these task-related functional connectivity changes with cognitive functions remain poorly substantiated. We examined the associations between psychometric intelligence and working memory (WM)-induced changes in functional connectivity in a large cohort of young adults. We discovered that psychometric intelligence is associated with WM-induced changes in functional connectivity with WM key nodes and other brain areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AveryEW, YooK, RosenbergMD, GreeneAS, GaoS, NaDL, et al.2020. Distributed patterns of functional connectivity predict working memory performance in novel healthy and memory-impaired individuals. J Cogn Neurosci, 32:241–255.
2.
BaddeleyA. 2003. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci, 4:829–839.
3.
BastenU, HilgerK, FiebachCJ. 2015. Where smart brains are different: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional and structural brain imaging studies on intelligence. Intelligence, 51:10–27.
4.
BurgessN, MaguireEA, O'KeefeJ. 2002. The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron, 35:625–641.
5.
CallicottJH, MattayVS, BertolinoA, FinnK, CoppolaR, FrankJA, et al.1999. Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex, 9:20–26.
6.
CattellRB. 1971. Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Boston:. Houghton-Mifflin.
7.
ConaG, SemenzaC. 2017. Supplementary motor area as key structure for domain-general sequence processing: a unified account. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 72:28–42.
8.
DantiS, HandjarasG, CecchettiL, Beuzeron-ManginaH, PietriniP, RicciardiE. 2018. Different levels of visual perceptual skills are associated with specific modifications in functional connectivity and global efficiency. Int J Psychophysiol, 123:127–135.
9.
DarkiF, KlingbergT. 2015. The role of fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal networks in the development of working memory: a longitudinal study. Cereb Cortex, 25:1587–1595.
10.
EngleRW, KaneMJ, TuholskiSW. 1999. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In: Miyake A, Shah P (eds.) Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; pp. 102–134.
11.
FinnES, ShenX, ScheinostD, RosenbergMD, HuangJ, ChunMM, et al.2015. Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat Neurosci, 18:1664–1671.
12.
FristonKJ, BuechelC, FinkGR, MorrisJ, RollsE, DolanRJ. 1997. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 6:218–229.
13.
FusterJM. 2006. The Prefrontal Cortex: Anatomy, Physiology, and Neuropsychology of the Frontal Lobe. New York: Raven. Press.
14.
GordonEM, LaumannTO, GilmoreAW, NewboldDJ, GreeneDJ, BergJJ, et al.2017. Precision functional mapping of individual human brains. Neuron, 95:791.e797–807.e797.
15.
GreeneAS, GaoS, ScheinostD, ConstableRT. 2018. Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits. Nat Commun, 9:1–13.
16.
GreiciusMD, SupekarK, MenonV, DoughertyRF. 2009. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex, 19:72–78.
17.
HilgerK, FukushimaM, SpornsO, FiebachCJ. 2020. Temporal stability of functional brain modules associated with human intelligence. Hum Brain Mapp, 41:362–372.
18.
JungRE, HaierRJ. 2007. The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behav Brain Sci, 30:135–154.
19.
KruschwitzJD, WallerL, DaedelowL, WalterH, VeerIM. 2018. General, crystallized and fluid intelligence are not associated with functional global network efficiency: a replication study with the human connectome project 1200 data set. Neuroimage, 171:323–331.
20.
LangeslagSJ, SchmidtM, GhassabianA, JaddoeVW, HofmanA, van der LugtA, et al.2013. Functional connectivity between parietal and frontal brain regions and intelligence in young children: the Generation R study. Hum Brain Mapp, 34:3299–3307.
21.
MagistroD, TakeuchiH, NejadKK, TakiY, SekiguchiA, NouchiR, et al.2015. The relationship between processing speed and regional white matter volume in healthy young people. PLoS One, 10:e0136386.
22.
MaldjianJA, LaurientiPJ, BurdetteJH. 2004. Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas. Neuroimage, 21:450–455.
23.
MaldjianJA, LaurientiPJ, KraftRA, BurdetteJH. 2003. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage, 19:1233–1239.
24.
MurphyS, NorburyR, GodlewskaB, CowenP, MannieZ, HarmerC, MunafoM. 2012. The effect of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on amygdala function: a meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry, 18:512–520.
25.
NachevP, KennardC, HusainM. 2008. Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nat Rev Neurosci, 9:856–869.
26.
NagelIE, PreuschhofC, LiS-C, NybergL, BäckmanL, LindenbergerU, HeekerenHR. 2011. Load modulation of BOLD response and connectivity predicts working memory performance in younger and older adults. J Cogn Neurosci, 23:2030–2045.
OwenAM, McMillanKM, LairdAR, BullmoreE. 2005. N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp, 25:46–59.
29.
PicardN, StrickPL. 1996. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb Cortex, 6:342–353.
30.
PowerJD, BarnesKA, SnyderAZ, SchlaggarBL, PetersenSE. 2012. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage, 59:2142–2154.
31.
PriceCJ. 2010. The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1191:62–88.
32.
RavenJ. 1998. Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists. Press.
33.
Reuter-LorenzPA, JonidesJ, SmithEE, HartleyA, MillerA, MarshuetzC, KoeppeRA. 2000. Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. J Cogn Neurosci, 12:174–187.
34.
RieckmannA, KarlssonS, FischerH, BäckmanL. 2011. Caudate dopamine D1 receptor density is associated with individual differences in frontoparietal connectivity during working memory. J Neurosci, 31:14284–14290.
35.
RosenbergMD, MartinezSA, RapuanoKM, ConleyMI, CohenAO, CornejoMD, et al.2020. Behavioral and neural signatures of working memory in childhood. J Neurosci, 40:5090–5104.
36.
SatterthwaiteTD, WolfDH, ErusG, RuparelK, ElliottMA, GennatasED, et al.2013. Functional maturation of the executive system during adolescence. J Neurosci, 33:16249–16261.
37.
SchillingC, KühnS, PausT, RomanowskiA, BanaschewskiT, BarbotA, et al.2012. Cortical thickness of superior frontal cortex predicts impulsiveness and perceptual reasoning in adolescence. Mol Psychiatry, 18:624–630.
38.
SchmithorstVJ. 2009. Developmental sex differences in the relation of neuroanatomical connectivity to intelligence. Intelligence, 37:164–173.
39.
SeitzRJ, NickelJ, AzariNP. 2006. Functional modularity of the medial prefrontal cortex: involvement in human empathy. Neuropsychology, 20:743.
40.
SimardI, LuckD, MottronL, ZeffiroTA, SoulièresI. 2015. Autistic fluid intelligence: increased reliance on visual functional connectivity with diminished modulation of coupling by task difficulty. NeuroImage Clin, 9:467–478.
41.
SmithSM, NicholsTE. 2009. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. NeuroImage, 44:83–98.
TakeuchiH, SugiuraM, SassaY, SekiguchiA, YomogidaY, TakiY, KawashimaR. 2012. Neural correlates of the difference between working memory speed and simple sensorimotor speed: an fMRI study. PLoS One, 7:e30579.
44.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, HashizumeH, SassaY, NagaseT, NouchiR, KawashimaR. 2011a. Effects of training of processing speed on neural systems. J Neurosci, 31:12139–12148.
45.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, HashizumeH, SassaY, NagaseT, NouchiR, KawashimaR. 2011b. Failing to deactivate: the association between brain activity during a working memory task and creativity. Neuroimage, 55:681–687.
46.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, NouchiR, HashizumeH, SassaY, SekiguchiA, et al.2014. Associations among imaging measures (2): the association between gray matter concentration and task-induced activation changes. Hum Brain Mapp, 35:185–198.
47.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, NouchiR, SekiguchiA, HashizumeH, SassaY, et al.2015a. Degree centrality and fractional amplitude of low-frequency oscillations associated with Stroop interference. Neuroimage, 119:197–209.
48.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, NouchiR, YokoyamaR, KotozakiY, NakagawaS, et al.2018. General intelligence is associated with working memory-related brain activity: new evidence from a large sample study. Brain Struct Funct, 223:4243–4258.
49.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, NouchiR, YokoyamaR, KotozakiY, NakagawaS, et al.2017. Global associations between regional gray matter volume and diverse complex cognitive functions: evidence from a large sample study. Sci Rep, 7:10014.
50.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, SassaY, HashizumeH, SekiguchiA, FukushimaA, KawashimaR. 2011c. Verbal working memory performance correlates with regional white matter structures in the fronto-parietal regions. Neuropsychologia, 49:3466–3473.
51.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, SekiguchiA, NouchiR, KotozakiY, NakagawaS, et al.2015b. Amygdala and cingulate structure is associated with stereotype on sex-role. Sci Rep, 5:14220.
52.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, SekuguchiA, HashizumeH, NouchiR, SassaY, et al.2015c. Mean diffusivity of globus pallidus associated with verbal creativity measured by divergent thinking and creativity-related temperaments in young healthy adults. Hum Brain Mapp, 36:1808–1827.
53.
TakeuchiH, TakiY, ThyreauB, SassaY, HashizumeH, SekiguchiA, et al.2013. White matter structures associated with empathizing and systemizing in young adults. Neuroimage, 77:222–236.
54.
TakeuchiH, TomitaH, TakiY, KikuchiY, OnoC, YuZ, et al.2015d. Cognitive and neural correlates of the 5-repeat allele of the dopamine D4 receptor gene in a population lacking the 7-repeat allele. Neuroimage, 110:124–135.
55.
ThatcherR, Palmero-SolerE, NorthD, BiverC. 2016. Intelligence and eeg measures of information flow: efficiency and homeostatic neuroplasticity. Sci Rep, 6:38890.
56.
Tzourio-MazoyerN, LandeauB, PapathanassiouD, CrivelloF, EtardO, DelcroixN, MazoyerB, JoliotM. 2002. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15:273–289.
57.
Van Den HeuvelMP, StamCJ, KahnRS, PolHEH. 2009. Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance. J Neurosci, 29:7619–7624.
58.
VulE, HarrisC, WinkielmanP, PashlerH. 2009. Reply to comments on “puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition.” Perspect Psychol Sci, 4:319–324.
WeberEMG, HahnT, HilgerK, FiebachCJ. 2017. Distributed patterns of occipito-parietal functional connectivity predict the precision of visual working memory. Neuroimage, 146:404–418.
61.
YamashitaM, YoshiharaY, HashimotoR, YahataN, IchikawaN, SakaiY, et al.2018. A prediction model of working memory across health and psychiatric disease using whole-brain functional connectivity. Elife, 7:e38844.
62.
ZillesK, SchlaugG, MatelliM, LuppinoG, SchleicherA, QüM, DabringhausA, SeitzR, RolandP. 1995. Mapping of human and macaque sensorimotor areas by integrating architectonic, transmitter receptor, MRI and PET data. J Anat, 187:515.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
